User talk:Unique user name

 Welcome

Hi ! Welcome to Wikipedia!

Be bold in editing pages and don't let others scare you off! To sign your posts (on talk pages, for example) use  ~  (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp.

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. If you need help, you can drop a note on my talk page or use New contributors' help page. You can also type   on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia! Paxse (talk) 14:15, 6 December 2008 (UTC)

Vreel
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Bios Element (talk) 10:13, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Vreel
I believe wiki should have all the FACTS regardless of wether they are "nice" or not, i have cited reliable references for all points so ther should not be a problem. P.S. I will be watching this page closely. Unique user name (talk) 11:12, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * The so called "Facts" your attempting to ad to the page violate several wikipedia policy's including WP:NORN and WP:NPOV. While i understand your intentions are well-intended, Other editors besides myself also agree that the E-mail as well as your random commentary are highly un-encyclopaedic. I recommend you read What Wikipedia is not as it will help you understand why I have, and will continue to revert these senseless edits. Also i have posted on the Talk:VReel page with further reasoning. Bios Element (talk) 17:25, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

@ Bios Element>> Those "so called facts" are inFACT just regular old backed up by reliable evidence type of FACTS, therefore i will strive to maintain this wiki page to be as FACTual as possible. Unique user name (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Vreel
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia.

December 2008
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ukexpat (talk) 17:59, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Please ban this user - continually vandalising pages without merit, only contribution has been poorly written, opinionated fluff.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 18:17, 9 December 2008 (UTC)


 * I do not believe any of the edits i made break any wiki rules, for example... how is "former zango site Vreel"  a personal analysis?  it is a blatant fact, backed up with a  link to the said site confirming the fact, this whole article was "fluff" written by vreel admin before i added to it. Unless im given a reasonable reason why my edits arn't facts i will continue to update this page to keep it NEUTRAL, as the rules ask! try looking that definition up. Unique user name (talk) 18:28, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

12 hour block for edit warring
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * Neutral doesn't mean pad out positive information with misleading/opinionated information. Your edits were also extremely poorly written. Example:

due to bandwidth theft, which should have been pre-empted, after all it is public knowledge that this is what caused Stage6 problems and they where backed by a massive company.

Firstly, this is riddled with poor English. And this is an incredibly personal/opinionated comment, which bares absolutely no relevance to this article. Please review make constructive contributions to avoid further disciplinary sanctions. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.24.204.7 (talk) 18:38, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

As for your statement of my post being "riddled with poor english" ... Well i wouldn't say riddled, but i suppose i should be more precise. I will fix my grammar and reword my edits as soon as i can edit again.
 * It is not misleading/opinionated at all, all the information is freely admitted by staff in previous posts on vreel.net/board, Therefore is completely and reliably verifiable. And by the way, neutral means "to represent all sides of an argument" Vreels history isn't all positive so why shouldn't the wiki reflect that?.
 * Care to tell us where on the forums it says any of this? No really, Cite it and I'll leave it. But without any citation, all your edits are simply opinionated, original research and simply wrong. I highly respect your dedication however your going about it the wrong way. Bios Element (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't suggest using a forums quote to substantiate that sort of statement. Web forums usually don't meet WP:RS. Specifically see WP:SPS. &mdash;/M endaliv /2¢/Δ's/ 06:52, 10 December 2008 (UTC)