User talk:Unisouth

Archives 1 • 2 • 3 • 4

Proposed deletion of AMK Mini Coaches
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article AMK Mini Coaches, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Oo7565 (talk) 20:00, 25 June 2008 (UTC)==Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Gladiators logo.JPG== Thanks for uploading Image:Gladiators logo.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:26, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Stansted rail badge.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stansted rail badge.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 08:57, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Comments on WT:LT
Hi Unisouth. Ive replied to your comments at WP:LT. I just wanted to inform you that I have no intention to get into any conflicts and if you have a problem with me, I'd rather sort it out calmly now to prevent any unneccesary conflicts in the future. If it is the best way, I will happily leave WP:LT to prevent any conflicts. Kindest regards. Tbo 157  (talk)  16:53, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Save Our Tuctuc - icon from Tuctuc website.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:Save Our Tuctuc - icon from Tuctuc website.PNG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:05, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

My images deleted
Hi could you please remove all my images (found in my galley on my user page) from Wikipedia please? Unisouth (talk) 15:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
 * If you want an image that you submitted to Wikipedia removed, assuming no one else has made any substantial edits to them, ad to the images in question.  VivioFa teFan   (Talk, Sandbox) 15:26, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

The Metro...
Hello Unisouth,

I have done March's issue, in the new format, at User:Bluegoblin7/Sandbox3. please take a look and comment.

It will be uncollapsible except for delivery and archive, as it's pointless to display it as current issue any other way.

Also, colours etc can be changed. Let me know!

Thanks,

 BG 7   13:55, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Article deletion
help One of my articles Connect2Wiltshire was deleted because it did not have enough significance. Well it does becuase it provides the only bus/share taxi services to many towns in south Wiltshire. Without it people would not be able to get to places like Mere and Stourhead. Unisouth (talk) 09:17, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * It may be very significant, but if it is not asserted it can be deleted. I suggest you contact Happy-melon, the deleting admin, to get it undeleted or userfied so you can assert the significance and then re make it. Tiddly  -  Tom  11:35, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi there. As Tiddly Tom says, the important issues is not importance, but notability.  Wikipedia does not deny that there are many topics which are important to someone, but are nonetheless unsuitable candidates for a Wikipedia articles.  Simply put, any article which is created, even if it is about a schoolboy who has made one amateur film that won a minor film award from a local magazine (which I have seen), is clearly important to the person who wrote the article (in that particular case, the guy wrote it himself, also creating a clear conflict of interest).  So Wikipedia's inclusion criterion says, essentially, "You think it's important.  Now show that reliable sources also think it's important".  The guideline indicates that "a subject is considered notable if it has received significant coverage in reliable sources which are independent of the subject".  This evidence for notability must be cited in the article itself; as you have seen, the absence of that claim to notability (whether the subject is actually notable under this guideline or not) is a criterion for immediate deletion.
 * So what should you do? Well, it seems you have an excellent chance of making a valid article here, as the topic is clearly important.  All you have to do is prove it: find some newspaper articles, BBC news coverage, any significant news source will do, that also says that it is the only bus/share taxi service in Wiltshire, and what a great thing that is.  I have restored the article and moved it to a subpage of your userspace - you can view and edit it at User:Unisouth/Connect2Wiltshire.  Once you have found some reliable source coverage of the topic, add some references.  Note that the article does not have to be lengthy - we have deleted much larger articles than this for not asserting notability, and many stubs survive with only a single sentence, as long as that sentence is a claim to notability.  Once you've provided some good references, you can move it back to its original title in the mainspace.  If you would like me or anyone else to have a look over the draft before you move it back to mainspace, just drop me a message on my talk page, or use the  template again.  Happy editing! Happy‑melon 16:45, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * That is more than adequate - feel free to move it back to the mainspace. Congratulations!  Happy‑melon 17:41, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your RFA
Requests for adminship/Unisouth - What's going on? Rudget . 16:13, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hmm, the RFA was incorrectly placed, the answers are short and the count was changed, is your account compromised? Rudget . 16:16, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I was too quick to come to that conclusion. Sorry. Rudget . 16:27, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA
Unless you come up with better answers to the questions, I humbly suggest you withdraw. Few would be willing to support with such bare bones answers. Nousernamesleft copper, not wood 19:00, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I agree with User:Nousernamesleft. Longer answers would help the voters get to know your opinions on the matters. You seem to be a very experienced user, but the answers don't reflect that. Spencer T♦C 19:22, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA
I've closed your RfA early at (0/11/5), as there was simply no chance of it passing. I suggest you get more general experience at your belt; participate at WP:RFA, do some admin-related work (like WP:AFD, WP:AIV, WP:CSD), and most importantly, write some articles. Hoping to see you back at RfA in a couple of months,  Maxim (talk)  02:55, 10 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Hey Unisouth. Sorry about your RfA which I just came across.  To improve your chances of passing RfA next time, I would suggest you become more involved in administrative procedures such as WP:XfD and CAT:CSD.  It would also help if you are a bit more responsive to messages left on your talk page so that you can show just how great a user you are.  You may also want to tick the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" checkbox in your preferences.  Please feel free to contact me if you would like any more advice.  Good luck next time.  Thanks.  Tbo 157   (talk)  10:48, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:LTportalframeless
A tag has been placed on Template:LTportalframeless requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 05:26, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject London Transport/DLR
Hi. Can I ask you what this new page you created is for. It doesn't really look like a resource for Wikipedia but more like advice for passengers which is not the sort of information for Wikipedia and may be deleted. See What Wikipedia is not. Please reply. Thanks. Tbo 157  (talk)  17:26, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for replying. Thats fine then.  But just a piece of advice that policies do apply in the Wikiproject space.  Have a read of Policies and guidelines and Criteria for speedy deletion.  You really should know policy like that if you wish to become an admin.  Thanks for your cooperation.  Tbo 157   (talk)  20:58, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Thorpe Park Map 2.PNG
A tag has been placed on Image:Thorpe Park Map 2.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 07:08, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Image:Thorpe Park Map.PNG
A tag has been placed on Image:Thorpe Park Map.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on  explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 07:10, 22 February 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.png
Thank you for uploading Image:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 12:48, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Logo of trouble.gif
Thank you for uploading Image:Logo of trouble.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 13:30, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Permission to use image
Hello,

I am writing to ask for your permission to use your image of a Tramlink vehicle on a website. I maintain the Toronto LRT Information Page (http://lrt.daxack.ca) and am in the process of adding a page describing Tramlink.

The site is a non-profit site set up to promote light rail transit in the Greater Toronto Area in Canada. I had the opportunity this past Wednesday to spend a few hours making notes and photographing Tramlink and in searching for additional information to add or back up my notes, I came across your image.

Please email me at lrt@daxack.ca and let me know if I can use your image or not. Also, if I may use your image, please let me know how it should be credited (either as "Unisouth" or by another name).

Thanks, Calvin Henry-Cotnam —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calvinhc (talk • contribs) 16:57, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Class 357 c2c Diagram.PNG
Thank you for uploading Image:Class 357 c2c Diagram.PNG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:23, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

Train diagrams
Just to say I have seen the train diagrams you have on your user page, I think they're really cool and that you should be very pleased with them! Keep the work up! -- Arriva436 shout!  18:14, 13 March 2008 (UTC)

Fairlop Loop
Hi again!

I spent the last few days writing up an article on the Fairlop Loop (and spending ages working out how to do the line diagram!), and I would be grateful if you could spend a few minutes seeing if it reads well, and also if there are extra Refs or External links that I could put in that I haven't thought of yet. I think the Categories are sufficient though. Many thanks, Sunil060902 (talk) 12:18, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I've tinkered about with it a little more over lunch, can't put in too many more book references because Brown and Cobb are all I have! Also will put in a couple more pics at the Vicarage Lane end showing Ilford Depot as it is today, best, Sunil060902 (talk) 14:51, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I've put in a load of inline references and more External links. Hope it's a lot better now! Sunil060902 (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections
The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 09:25, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Alternative_subway_logo.PNG
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Alternative_subway_logo.PNG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rockfang (talk) 08:05, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Notability of AMK Mini Coaches
A tag has been placed on AMK Mini Coaches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2008 (UTC)

Ibus
What is it exactly? Simply south (talk) 19:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

re:Metro
Ok, that makes sense - perhaps we should handle it jointly?

Even though i'm not actively editing, i'm still watching!

Thanks,

 BG 7   10:20, 18 April 2008 (UTC)

WP Darwen Holdings icon
Hello! Firstly, I'd like to apologise at the length of time it has taken me to reply. Unfortunately, I have just been on holiday minus a computer so I couldn't reply, so sorry about that. I should have put the "Wiki break" templates up but I forgot and then didn't have time. Anyway, to the icon: I did have a go at trying to remove the white background, but I don't have any decent image editing programs on my PC so I couldn't do it. I see you have had the image deleted so it doesn't really matter anymore thought it was a good idea if someone could rm the background. Arriva436 talk 09:34, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:A1 grand prix logo.PNG
Thanks for uploading Image:A1 grand prix logo.PNG. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --19:07, 22 April 2008 (UTC)


 * I happened to stray across this, and so have added an appropriate fair use rationale. I hope you don't mind! It seems they are trying to delete/fix all the logos uploaded, even ones uploaded before the new rules came in (on 13 July 2006 if I remember correctly!!) Arriva436 talk  19:49, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

Diagrams...
Hi Unisouth,

Could I possibly use your diagrams on my websites, http://railway.transportcentre.co.uk, http://trams.wikia.com and http://uktransport.wikia.com?

Also, could you possibly do some for me? If so, please contact me off wiki!

Finally, I would like to say sorry for our disagreements in the past - can we start a clean sheet? Also, can we be joint editors/designers on the Metro? And yes, I think it's better to make it in the mainspace - we just don't add the link until it's time!

Thanks,

 BG 7   15:42, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Hi Unisouth,
 * No worries about sites - emails? Otherwise, i'll mention it on here. I presume it's trams/trains?
 * Also, I agree on design. I'll have a look around some other areas, and we can implement it for Issue 6?
 * Diagrams that would be helpful would be other UK Trams, such as Sheffield, Manchester etc, and trains would be (at the moment) anything in Central, one, Arriva and Southern liveries.
 * Thanks,
 *  BG 7   17:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes I agree. Perhaps we should stick with the current one for now?
 * Oh, if possible tube trains too... highr priority!
 * Please do them around your normal life - they are low priority in the Grand Scheme of Things!
 * It's really appreciated, and sorry if i'm asking too much!
 * Thanks,
 *  BG 7   18:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

MfD nomination of WikiProject London Transport/DLR
WikiProject London Transport/DLR, a page you created, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/DLR and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of WikiProject London Transport/DLR during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. – Dream out loud (talk) 19:21, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

I think we both deserve this.
Lamest_edit_wars. Durova Charge! 19:07, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:Infobox London Bus
In this template the insertion of anything along with the "number" disrupts the reading of that number to display a related "Performance" pdf file at the bottom of the template. You are incorrectly using it for your Template:Ibus route. I am surprised that none of the regular users have bothered to comment. Perhaps you can fix it before they wake up. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:07, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I am not involved in this project. I was trying to help you and had hoped that you could quietly fix the problem. You have made things worse in that now none of the articles can display the pdf file, not just the ones where you have inserted the corrupting information. They do not have this new parameter you created. Why not simply make that extra parameter to be "ibus = yes/no" and revert the template to work as before, except for the additional function created by you to display the logo only if the entry is 'yes'. You don't need another external template to do that. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 19:55, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
 * I have repaired this template so that if you enter the paramter ibus=yes then the icon will display after the number. Everything else has been reverted to work the way it did before. I think this was what you were trying to do. -Secondarywaltz (talk) 04:38, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

May Metro!
Enjoy Unisouth... Roll on June... and DLR Workforce (being launched in a few ticks...

<font face="Gill Sans MT"> BG 7   19:15, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Ads
per this ad, please list all of the images you used to make that ad as a part of attribution and GFDL.  m <font color="#4CBB17">ir <font color="#ADFF2F">a <font color="#4CBB17">nd  a   21:03, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

7 Million Londoners Banner
I have recently put the banner on my userpage, as you requested to comply with GFDL rules, I have taken it off permanently, User:East london line 12.38 10 May 2008 (UTC).

POTD scheduling
Hi and thanks for your efforts in scheduling the Picture of the day. However, the image you selected, Image:The FA Cup Trophy in 2008.jpg is not a Featured Picture. The Pictures of the day are selected from the existing Featured pictures in a roughly FIFO order. If you are interested in nominating this image for Featured status, please do so at Featured picture candidates. If you would like to help out with the POTD, please be sure to read Picture of the day/Guidelines. Thank you and let me know if you have any questions.  howcheng  {chat} 23:50, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

Your rollback request
I've granted you rollback. Please remember to use it only for obvious vandalism, and never use it for good-faith edits. If in doubt, use the undo button, as it allows you to input an edit summary. Visit New admin school/Rollback to practice, and ask if you need help. Best, PeterSymonds (talk)  16:39, 15 May 2008 (UTC)

Re:450 Diagram
Hi Uni,

I'm really loving the dia! It's great! Could you possibly send me a blank copy so I may have a go myself?

Also, have you had any ideas for the June Metro? I'll start it off with the current layout, and we can change it in due course.

Thanks,

<font face="Gill Sans MT"> Blue Goblin 7even  15:02, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

task force logos
Hi Unisouth. Thanks for creating the higher quality logos. For future reference, can I ask what programme you use to create the high quality logos. Thanks. Tbo 157  (talk)  12:31, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Thats exactly what I did, Any ideas on what im doing wrong?  Thanks.  Tbo 157   (talk)  16:10, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Are all your diagrams made on MS Paint too? Tbo 157   (talk)  10:55, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Wow, you must be really good with MS Paint. Thanks Unisouth.   Tbo 157   (talk)  11:40, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

Some advice
I just thought I'd give you some advice on edit summaries as you say you often forget to add them on your user page. In "My preferences", which can be found at the top right hand corner of your page, under the editing tab, there is a checkbox you can tick saying "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". This tool reminds you to enter an edit summary if you forget and is quite useful if you wish to become an admin. Quite alot of people look out for users using edit summaries in RfAs and im sure alot of users would strongly advise potential admins such as yourself to tick this box. Hope this helps and good luck with your RfA soon. Thanks. Tbo 157  (talk)  23:28, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Diagram
Hi Unisouth. Can I ask if you have a diagram of a British Rail Class 395 as I want to try and make a diagram myself and I don't want to make one that already exists. Thanks. Tbo 157  (talk)  12:01, 28 May 2008 (UTC)

When adding information to an article...
Cite it. (the Angus burger (Burger King)) Also take the time to enter it properly, look how other items are listed on the page and copy it. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 07:59, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

All I am asking is that you take a little extra time to see how the article is constructed. There is no citation about your entry as there is with the low-carb Angus and the western BBQ Angus sandwiches. Also, there is nothing stating where the product is sold, like the line right above it which states that the that particular product was sold in in the UK as a limited time product.

I'm sorry you if you took offense with my initial comment, but I usually just come straight to the point and leave a simple, terse statement instead of a long winded note. --Jeremy ( Blah blah... ) 16:30, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Lucketts Travel
i suggest you add some links to the Lucketts Travel article, and link to it from other pages, it is orphaned right now, and at risk of AfD. Regards, Shoombooly (talk) 11:47, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

London river stub
Hi - a stub template, category, or redirect which you created has been nominated for deletion or renaming at Stub types for deletion. The stub type, which was not proposed at WikiProject Stub sorting/Proposals, does not meet the standard requirements for a stub type, either through being incorrectly named, ambiguously scoped, or through failure to meet standards relating to the current stub hierarchy or likely size, as explained at Stub. Please feel free to make any comments at WP:SFD regarding this stub type, and in future, please consider proposing new stub types first! Grutness...<small style="color:#008822;">wha?  05:01, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of S & M Cafe
A tag has been placed on S & M Cafe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bit Lordy (talk) 09:47, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

June 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from a page you have created yourself. If you do not believe the page should be deleted, you can place a tag on the page, under the existing speedy deletion tag (please do not remove the speedy deletion tag), and make your case on the page's. Administrators will look at your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Bit Lordy (talk) 11:20, 4 June 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Player logo 2.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Player logo 2.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

User page
do you stil want help creating your userpage?  Mr. Green  Hit Me Up   About Me  18:18, 18 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok.What exactly do you want?I can make a background like mine with different colors.Unless you have an idea of what you want.I'm goingt o be working on it here.  Mr. Green  Hit Me Up   About Me  15:07, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * As you wish! (The Princess Bride)


 * Ok.what kind of font did you have in mind? (BTW-my internet keeps crashing so I'll have to work on it offline.I'm also going to be a little slow to answer mesages.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.106.215.246 (talk) 17:32, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * Ok.My internet seems to be working again, but I'm running out of time.I'll finish my research today and I'll start tommrow.I should have it done by Monday or tuesday.Do you want your pictures to each hae their own box.and what color do you want the boxes to all have the same color and border?  Mr. Green  Hit Me Up   About Me  18:37, 19 June 2008 (UTC)


 * OK....so what colors did you want the seperate boxes to be?Colors slightly different then The turquoise and navy border?Or just a bunch of different colors?


 * Cooly....I'm still trying to figure it out....its more confusing then I thought, but I should be able to figure it out today. Bocaj Neerg   Hit Me Up ''' 15:40, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Editor review/Unisouth
I reviewed you. Yechiel (Shalom) 04:27, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Userpage
Do you still need help with it?

7Deadly Sinsgreed, gluttony, and wrathenvy, sloth, lust and pride —Preceding comment was added at 23:31, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

New DLR trains photo
Whoever lives in Beckton can upload images of the new DLR trains that is stored at the DLR deport near Gallion’s Reach train station and Gallion’s Reach shopping center.--Tyw7, formerly Troop350 (talk) 08:28, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Registration lists illegal?
Hello, you stated on Talk:Arriva Southern Counties that bus registration lists are illegal, why is this? Huangcjz (talk) 17:28, 8 July 2008 (UTC)

Bus company articles in danger
I thought I would inform you of quite a big problem that has happened today. If you look at Talk:First Leeds, User Talk:Lradrama and User talk:Richard Harvey you will see that Richard Harvey has taken it upon himself to remove a lot of content from articles without anyone (unless you happened to see Talk:First Leeds) knowing. While I accept that fares and other info is a bit excessive, I feel that removing routes is going too far, as they are the most important part of what a bus company does. All the articles have just been changed without any discussion, unless of course you have happened to see Talk:First Leeds.

However, what I think will worry you most is the fact that Richard Harvey has decided to redirect all of the bus route articles in Glasgow and the West Midlands to their operators. This could cause a particular problem when he comes to the London Buses routes, these have already survived deletions, I don't know what he is going to do! Anyway, this was just to inform you, you can take any action you feel necessary, even nothing!!! <b style="color:#FF0000;">Arriva436</b><sup style="color:#800080;">talk 17:52, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Excellent! Thanks for your support in this. I just thought I'd notify you on this, I think we need as many people in the discussion as possible to get a solution to this. It appears that we are getting into diplomatic discussion now! <b style="color:#FF0000;">Arriva436</b><sup style="color:#800080;">talk 15:21, 11 July 2008 (UTC)

i am so sorry..
That picture you have taken of the modern Pizza Hut honestly hurts to look at. Not because of the artistic quality of the picture, but because of its contents. I'm from the States, and when I saw that picture I genuinely thought that Pizza Hut was down the street from my house in Southern California. The landscaping and car park bigger than the restaurant itself just look so ridiculously American. When I first went to the UK, I was in shock by all the McDonalds, Pizza Huts, Subways, KFCs, and other disgusting restaurants from my country that I actually saw people eating at. There is a McDonalds half a mile from my house, and I drive by it everyday, and I have never seen more than two or three cars in front, but the sushi restaurant across the street is always absolutely full. So naturally, I found it completely strange that these sort of places were full in London! Queues out the door during Burger King's breakfast, and not an empty table in a Pizza Hut around 6pm.

Basically, I'd just like to apologise on behalf of the greedy corporations in my country for making your country look identical to mine. That Pizza Hut in Portsmouth would not be out of place in any middle-class suburban neighbourhood in California, and quite frankly that scares me. Globalisation is one thing, but aesthetic uniformity across different nations is a frightening notion. Having a Mcdonalds at the bottom of a Victorian building is one thing, but this Pizza Hut should not be allowed! Like Morrissey said in 1987,

"I believe that everything went downhill from the moment the McDonald's chain was given licence to invade England - don't laugh I'm serious. To me it was like the outbreak of war and I couldn't understand why English troops weren't retaliating."

If you'd like to reply to this, please send me an email at ericxpenner@yahoo.com, I would love to hear your outlook. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ericxpenner (talk • contribs) 01:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

iBus logos
Hi Unisouth. Would it be possible for the iBus logos you put on bus route articles be linked to the ibus article as most people are not likely to know what it is. Thanks very much. Tbo 157  (talk)  13:14, 16 July 2008 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for the barnstar Unisouth. As you can see from my user page, I have decided to leave wikipedia and I would like to thank you for your support on wikipedia during my time here. Tbo 157  (talk)  09:24, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Player logo 3.PNG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Player logo 3.PNG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Bus company articles
I discussion in currently in progress about the large scale edits Richard Harvey has made to some bus company articles. It is being held at User talk:Richard Harvey/Bus articles (at the bottom). I wondered whether you would be willing to discuss the issue, I have given my opinions on the matter. If you could it would be great, but don't feel you have to. Thanks!! <b style="color:#FF0000;">Arriva436</b><sup style="color:#800080;">talk 20:07, 22 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:M27.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:M27.PNG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:58, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Image:LOL logo.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:LOL logo.PNG, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 20:44, 27 July 2008 (UTC)

Metro
Just a quick note, i will do this month's. It looks like it is slowly picking up. Simply south (talk) 20:49, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * But i am needing help on some sections, particularly what to say in "From the editor". Simply south (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks, i will continue and distribute v quickly when i get back. Please can you think of one? (talk) 13:58, 8 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Could you just very quickly look over the late late late edition? I was not sure what to write on revival still. I have not distributed it yet. Simply south (talk) 18:04, 19 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the advice and that. I hope you stay etc. Simply south (talk) 18:56, 19 August 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Last of the Summer Wine (series 30)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Last of the Summer Wine (series 30), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Redfarmer (talk) 02:38, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Last of the Summer Wine (series 30)
I have nominated Last of the Summer Wine (series 30), an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Last of the Summer Wine (series 30). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Redfarmer (talk) 15:07, 27 August 2008 (UTC)

Oxford Wikimania 2010 and Wikimedia UK v2.0 Notice
Hi,

As a regularly contributing UK Wikipedian, we were wondering if you wanted to contribute to the Oxford bid to host the 2010 Wikimania conference. Please see here for details of how to get involved, we need all the help we can get if we are to put in a compelling bid.

We are also in the process of forming a new UK Wikimedia chapter to replace the soon to be folded old one. If you are interested in helping shape our plans, showing your support or becoming a future member or board member, please head over to the Wikimedia UK v2.0 page and let us know. We plan on holding an election in the next month to find the initial board, who will oversee the process of founding the company and accepting membership applications. They will then call an AGM to formally elect a new board who after obtaining charitable status will start the fund raising, promotion and active support for the UK Wikimedian community for which the chapter is being founded.

You may also wish to attend the next London meet-up at which both of these issues will be discussed. If you can't attend this meetup, you may want to watch Meetup, for updates on future meets.

We look forward to hearing from you soon, and we send our apologies for this automated intrusion onto your talk page!

Addbot (talk) 20:30, 30 August 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Fort boyard logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Fort boyard logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:15, 16 September 2008 (UTC)

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!
Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 21:25, 17 September 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)

September\October Metro
Simply south (talk) 13:29, 4 October 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 02:24, 8 October 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Chiltern railways logo.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Chiltern railways logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:21, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Westminster Passenger Services Association
A tag has been placed on Westminster Passenger Services Association requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Bongomatic (talk) 03:01, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Optare Rapta
A tag has been placed on Optare Rapta requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Vivio Testa rossa  Talk Who 21:34, 4 November 2008 (UTC)

Help with signature
help I want to use a new signature but apparantly

 Uni <font color="#7DF9FF">south ( A • C )

is invalid HTML, however I cannot find anything wrong with it. Could someone please help with this? Unisouth.
 * I'll check it / update it for you. Give me a few mins. <font face="Verdana"> Stwalkerster [  talk  ]  17:40, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * The following is valid XHTML, after it has been parsed by the wiki engine, and also uses more up-to-date tags than before. It produces: Uni  south ( A • C ). Regards, :) <font face="Verdana"> Stwalkerster  [  talk  ]  17:52, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

It still says ''Invalid raw signature. Check HTML tags.''! Unisouth.
 * Hmm - upon further investigation it appears there is a limit to the length of your signature. It's cutting it off before the end, so not everything is being included. <font face="Verdana"> Stwalkerster [  talk  ]  18:13, 17 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Try this - it's using the older &lt;font&gt; tags, but at least it should work. Produces: Uni <font color="#7DF9FF">south ( A • C )


 * Regards, <font face="Verdana"> Stwalkerster [  talk  ]  18:26, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Thank you very much! It now works as you can see on my main user page. Uni <font color="#7DF9FF">south ( A • C ) 18:29, 17 November 2008 (UTC)

Pillar box
In your edit summary with your Pillar box edit you write: "I believe I found the Havant location but is located within the borough at Worlds End". Belief is for religion, while verifiability is for encyclopaedias. So, do you know, or not know, if the box you found is in Denmead and if you can confirm this belief with a verifiable source? Personal knowledge or research is unfortunately not verifiable or Wikipedia acceptable. (I post in one place to keep a discussion together, so am watching this page). ww2censor (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Someone else has taken a photograph of the First National Standard pillar box . I have visited the location and it is near a George Gale & Co public house at Worlds End, Denmead in the borough of Havant. However the box number P07 97 hovever suggests that there might be another First National Standard in Havant. So if there is another First National Standard pillar box in Havant please let me know! Uni <font color="#7DF9FF">south ( A • C ) 12:47, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Southern Co-ops shop?
Just to let you know (in case you missed it) that I posted a question about one of your images at commons:User talk:Unisouth

--InfantGorilla (talk) 10:37, 13 December 2008 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 19:20, 14 December 2008 (UTC)

Transport Diagrams
Those diagrams of various trains you do must take *ages*. It's good that you're doing them, but perhaps you could consider doing them in SVG format so that they're more easily modifyable for other projects? Inkscape is a cross-platform application which allows you to do that :)

KenBW2 (talk) 13:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

Goodbye
Sorry to see you go. You have done a lot of hard work on Wikipedia in many different areas. WikiProject:LT is probably the main thing. But we all have to go sometimes. Thanks for the help and support you've given me! If you never come back, then good luck and goodbye! <span style="font-family:Zapfino, Segoe Script;"><b style="color:#FF0000;">Arriva436</b><sup style="color:#800080;><b style="color:#800080;">talk</b>/<b style="color:#800080;">contribs</b> 16:32, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Images
There's a proposal to delete or improve the quality/systematise the use of : the drawn images of train liveies at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Trains#Drawn_images_of_liverys_-_conflict_over_removal

I see that you have contributed some of them. eg

Could you contribute please.

Specifically there are a few issues -
 * trademark (are the liveries trademarked)
 * Accuracy - do you have detailed descriptions of the liveries - if so it would be very useful if you could supply links to the descriptions - specifically in terms of the type of paint used (eg as a British Standard colour or similar)

Thanks87.102.43.12 01:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.102.43.12 (talk)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:56, 14 February 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:17, 1 April 2009 (UTC)

File:Co-op Golden Nut Cornflakes.jpg
Hi, this has been proposed for deletion. Please join in the debate at Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Co-op Golden Nut Cornflakes.jpg. --Simon Speed (talk) 23:41, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

May Metro
Not sure if you still want it, but…

As Simply South is busy, I've stepped in for this one; this is my first time, so feel free to fix any mistakes or let me know of anything I've missed. – iride  scent  18:08, 6 May 2009 (UTC) 

GA Sweeps invitation
Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are a member of the GA WikiProject. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 08:51, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:London tv logo.JPG)
Thanks for uploading File:London tv logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:26, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:17, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

Docklands Light Railway rolling stock
Do you want to help me in improving the Docklands Light Railway rolling stock article? Please reply on my talk page. --<font face="Georgia">Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) 11:25, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:39, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:FILM September Election Voting
The September 2009 project coordinator election has begun. We will be selecting seven coordinators from a pool of candidates to serve for the next six months; members can still nominate themselves if interested. Please vote here by September 28! This message has been sent as you are registered as an active member of the project. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 02:29, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 05:26, 18 October 2009 (UTC)

Update To Thorpe_Park_Map_3
The image mapping out Thorpe Parks rides has a spelling error. colossus has been spelt as collosus and colossal has been spelt collosal. atlantis has also been spelt alantis, this has not been corrected on the link.

a recommended update can be found on image shack —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.76.134.127 (talk) 00:24, 9 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Unfortunately, Unisouth has now retired from Wikipedia and no longer edits, so it unlikely to reply to this. However, if you create an account yourself, you should be able to upload a new version of File:Thorpe Park Map 3.png yourself after a while. Hope that helps. <span style="font-family:Zapfino, Segoe Script;"><b style="color:#FF0000;">Arriva436</b><sup style="color:#800080;><b style="color:#800080;">talk</b>/<b style="color:#800080;">contribs</b> 12:59, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Alternative subway logo.PNG listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Alternative subway logo.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Koman90 A+ (talk) 03:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:13, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

Metro
Another issue to be adressed is, please could people indicate in the next month at the feedback page or on my talk page whether they still want to recieve issues of the metro. A lot of newsletters seem to be going to redundant pages. Simply south (talk) 19:52, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 17:35, 15 March 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Proper Cornish Food Company


The article Proper Cornish Food Company has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bretonbanquet (talk) 19:04, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

April 2010 GAN backlog elimination drive
–MuZemike delivered by MuZebot 18:23, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

- Talk to you later, Presidentman (talk) Random Picture of the Day 22:01, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:30, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 15:53, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Thorpe Park Map
This image really needs to be updated as things have changed to Thorpe park like Saw: Alive has been added since this image was created in 2008, 2 years ago. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismartyparty (talk • contribs) 19:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Trouble is, Unisouth has retired from Wikipedia and no longer does any edits. <span style="font-family:Zapfino, Segoe Script;"><b style="color:#FF0000;">Arriva436</b><sup style="color:#800080;><b style="color:#800080;">talk</b>/<b style="color:#800080;">contribs</b> 19:45, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Ohh, Do you know any person on wiki that would make a replacement image? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ismartyparty (talk • contribs) 19:39, 10 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.9.172.0 (talk)

User:Unisouth/The Secret Page Challenge
User:Unisouth/The Secret Page Challenge has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Unisouth/The Secret Page Challenge. Cunard (talk) 02:00, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 16:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Heathrow connect logo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Heathrow connect logo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 05:44, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:WikiProject Brighton Templates
Category:WikiProject Brighton Templates, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. — This, that, and the other (talk) 04:33, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Kirby & West for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kirby & West is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Kirby & West until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Joe Chill (talk) 22:22, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Waterloo & City Line.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Waterloo & City Line.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:52, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Victoria Line.svg


A tag has been placed on File:Victoria Line.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:16, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Haettenschweiler.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Haettenschweiler.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:10, 16 November 2011 (UTC)

File:HeaderUnisouth.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HeaderUnisouth.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:18, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cruiser (charter vessel)


The article Cruiser (charter vessel) has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. <font face="Verdana"><font color="Purple">Barkeep <font color="Gray">Chat/<font color="Gray">''' 14:35, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Hammersmith and city roundel.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Hammersmith and city roundel.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

File:WikiProject Darwen Holdings.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikiProject Darwen Holdings.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:46, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

New Year Metro
Sorry its late and happy new year. Simply south...... having large explosions for 5 years 23:07, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikidotmatrix.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wikidotmatrix.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Calibri sample.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Calibri sample.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 12:47, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Transport sample.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Transport sample.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 17:22, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Underscore.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Underscore.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 18:33, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Coffee Tempo.PNG
 Thanks for uploading File:Coffee Tempo.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Ariel view of havant station.PNG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ariel view of havant station.PNG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 22:01, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:UK give way.PNG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:UK give way.PNG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 04:03, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Future of WikiProject Amusement Parks
Hi Unisouth. I am contacting you because you are listed as one of members of WikiProject Amusement Parks or one of its task forces. I have just started a discussion on the project's talk page regarding the future of the project. I have made four proposals and I would appreciate your comments on them. Thank you Themeparkgc   Talk  23:30, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

Mid Dec Metro
Sorry this edition is so late. Simply south...... walking into bells for just 6 years 11:41, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Enterprise (bus company)


The article Enterprise (bus company) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable small subsidiary company. The only reference is a dead link to the operating company rendering it unverifiable.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 09:21, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Optare ColumboRider for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Optare ColumboRider is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Optare ColumboRider until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Tom the Tomato (talk) 08:22, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Worthing Coaches


The article Worthing Coaches has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable local hire company. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 19:33, 13 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.JPG listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.JPG, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.JPG missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as: is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
 * File:Location of disused halts on the portsmouth direct line.JPG

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 18:58, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

50th edition
Here is the 50th edition. I can only apologise this is so late as a lot of work came up but it is still no excuse so again I will apologise. Inside includes everything since the last edition as usual. Enjoy. Simply south...... fighting ovens for just 7 years 22:24, 6 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of AMK Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AMK Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AMK Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  00:58, 7 September 2013 (UTC)

Notification of automated file description generation
Your upload of File:7 million londoners, 1 london.PNG or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 2 December 2013 (UTC)


 * Another one of your uploads, File:Central line footbridge.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 14:10, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

December edition
Please feel free to suggest any changes or add any requests such as images for the gallery. If you also want to have a try for the new year's edition or any future editions, please do not hesitate to ask. Simply south...... cooking letters for just 7 years 21:32, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Plaxton Pronto for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Plaxton Pronto is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Plaxton Pronto until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - →Davey 2010→  →Talk to me!→  06:33, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Parks Article Clean-Up
Recently, an issue has been brought up regarding the notability of many articles within WikiProject Amusement Parks. As a result, a page has been created regarding this issue as well as a possible solution (which will be on-going). In a nut-shell, certain articles will be picked to be reviewed in each stage and the WikiProject members (you) will decide if the article should be deleted or kept based on Wikipedia's notability guidelines.

I hoping this will work and if it doesn't, oh well...I tried.

More info can be found on the linked page above.--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2014 (UTC) Sent by Dom497

Proposed deletion of Cango


The article Cango has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable local operation. Fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Charles (talk) 19:17, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Go north east 2.JPG
Thanks for uploading File:Go north east 2.JPG. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as non-free fair use or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 12:51, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of AMT Coffee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article AMT Coffee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/AMT Coffee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Velella  Velella Talk 20:49, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Fine Burger Company


The article Fine Burger Company has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Minor burger chain. Not notable.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 10:22, 17 April 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of S & M Cafe


The article S & M Cafe has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non notable restaurant.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Philafrenzy (talk) 21:51, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Silver btp roundel.PNG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Silver btp roundel.PNG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 06:43, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of S & M Cafe for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article S & M Cafe is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/S & M Cafe until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#8209; Iridescent 08:19, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of London Buses route 350 for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article London Buses route 350 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/London Buses route 350 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Jeni ( talk ) 11:01, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

File:Underground roundel.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Underground roundel.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:04, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Unisouth title bar.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Unisouth title bar.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:WikiProject Underground Thin.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikiProject Underground Thin.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:WikiProject Underground Fat.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WikiProject Underground Fat.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:09, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Wiki metro pm ex 2.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wiki metro pm ex 2.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:11, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:WPMTV logo.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:WPMTV logo.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:21, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

File:Portal Tube Logo White.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Portal Tube Logo White.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Cloudbound (talk) 15:23, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

أيمن
أرسلوا لي الألعاب — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.45.101.145 (talk) 08:01, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Nomination of Emsworth & District for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Emsworth & District is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Emsworth & District until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 03:55, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

File:Gill Sans Example.PNG listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gill Sans Example.PNG, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:36, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:WikiProject Underground.PNG


The file File:WikiProject Underground.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Unused logo with no article used, it's also can't move to commons because of an unused logo will be deleted as of out of project scope."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Willy1018 (talk) 14:00, 27 December 2018 (UTC)

MfD nomination of your Portal
Note. A portal which you created or substantially contributed to has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are most welcome and can participate in the discussion by adding your feedback at Miscellany for deletion/Mixed bag of group portals. You are free to edit the content of the portal during the discussion, but you should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page. Such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you, &#8211;  MJL &thinsp;‐Talk‐☖ 00:23, 22 April 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Corbel in corbel.PNG


The file File:Corbel in corbel.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – June 2019
Sent by DannyS712 (talk) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 08:53, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2019
Sent by User:ZLEA via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:16, 19 July 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Handel Gothic Demo.PNG


The file File:Handel Gothic Demo.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Superseded by Handel Gothic Type Specimen.svg"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:33, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Havant station layout changes 4.PNG


A tag has been placed on File:Havant station layout changes 4.PNG requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:36, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Havant station layout changes 2.PNG


The file File:Havant station layout changes 2.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This image is orphaned and File:JUNE 2006 LAYOUT.PNG is the same image as this but File:JUNE 2006 LAYOUT.PNG has more annotations and more information than this image."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:37, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Havant station layout changes.PNG


The file File:Havant station layout changes.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This image is orphaned and File:JUNE 2006 LAYOUT.PNG is the same image as this but File:JUNE 2006 LAYOUT.PNG has more annotations and more information than this image."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:39, 22 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Resized version of my word search example by Lenny.PNG


The file File:Resized version of my word search example by Lenny.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "unused, low-res, no obvious use"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 December 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – January 2020
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:19, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Optare Rapta for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Optare Rapta is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Optare Rapta until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 21:55, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

WikiProject status request
Hi there! Hope you are doing well! WikiProject Amusement Parks is going through some updates, and in the process, we are identifying members that are still active.If you'd like to remain in the list of participants, please visit the page and change unknown to active in the chart for your username. After 90 days, all editors with "unknown" status will be moved to the inactive list automatically. If you'd like to stop receiving these notifications, simply remove your name from the page. Thank you! --GoneIn60 (talk) 23:36, 25 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: You are receiving this notification, because you are listed as a participant of WikiProject Amusement Parks.

File:Former Uni-link (Minerva Accord) logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Former Uni-link (Minerva Accord) logo.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:03, 15 August 2020 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chatsworth Television


The article Chatsworth Television has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Tagged as unsourced since 2007"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Another Believer ( Talk ) 03:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Wright Nimbus for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wright Nimbus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Wright Nimbus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Davey 2010 Talk 19:14, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Optare Sigma for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Optare Sigma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Optare Sigma until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SK2242 (talk) 13:11, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wiki new railbus.PNG


The file File:Wiki new railbus.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned userspace image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 20:05, 18 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wiki pm front 4.PNG


The file File:Wiki pm front 4.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wiki pm front 3.PNG


The file File:Wiki pm front 3.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wiki pm front 2.PNG


The file File:Wiki pm front 2.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wiki pm ex 3.PNG


The file File:Wiki pm ex 3.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:Wiki pm ex.PNG


The file File:Wiki pm ex.PNG has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Orphaned image, no context to determine possible future encyclopedic use."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 05:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)

Nomination of Darwen Group for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darwen Group is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Darwen Group until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SailingInABathTub (talk) 11:42, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

WikiProject Big Brother Newsletter – July 2020
User:TheDoctorWho (talk) 08:14, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

MfD nomination of Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa
Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Gonnym (talk) 11:33, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa
Wikipedia:WikiProject London Transport/PLT-sa has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 11:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:BBCmemberwelcome
Template:BBCmemberwelcome has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Nigej (talk) 14:47, 4 March 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of City Cruises for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article City Cruises is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/City Cruises until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Invading Invader  (userpage, talk) 18:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

CfD nomination at
A category or categories you have created have been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at  on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Qwerfjkl talk  09:31, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Optare Bonito


The article Optare Bonito has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "not notable"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Optare Bonito for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Optare Bonito is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Optare Bonito until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. NotAGenious (talk) 05:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)