User talk:Universal Life/Archive 6

Due to his close proximity to the area of the disaster of the century, the user Universal Life since the early days of the earthquake got immersed with the immense work of rescue and aid to the area. The situation is dire, way more than what's represented on the press. He's trying do his upmost in helping in the best way, to as many people as possible, so that they can survive. He is also trying to organise the messy administration of aid, while working with NGOs and cooperating with several organisations. He won't be able to edit the Wikipedia for a while or answer your to your messages.

Bhaskarcharya
Sir you have made the recent quotation which was been already debunked by David Wilson on his talk page. please don't further add any description about the article. Obiwana (talk) 12:27, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics
Selfstudier (talk) 18:37, 21 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi Selfstudier,
 * I actually meant to write to you and ask you: Why did you tag the List of de facto autonomous states and areas article that I've been creating as part of the Arab-Israeli conflict? It is a list of more than 200 countries and territories around the world and tries to be as little political as possible. Israel and Palestine is a very tiny part of it.
 * I also was going to tell you that you seem to be interested in the topic of states and autonomous areas etc. May be we could cooperate? --Universal Life (talk) 18:59, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * There are two notices, one where the entire article is AI related and the other where only part is related, in this case the parts relating to Palestine and Israel specifically, which have caused problems in many List articles. I won't make a judgement now but I have the sense that the page is likely to give rise to some issues (not just the AI part where I have some issues that I will raise once the "in creation" tag is removed). Selfstudier (talk) 19:16, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Could you give me some hints, so that I might better the article, before removing the tag? I have intentions to grow and better the article, I could really use some advice. Should I add a lot of references before removing the "in creation" tag? And that would take some time and I don't think I could keep that tag long enough to add enough references. Is the goal of the article (my intention in creating the page) articulated well and clear enough? Right now, it is just a draft. And I want it to contain just enough political information to understand the present situation, not too much of it; I wouldn't want it to be drown with politics. I find the idea of a list of all inhabited areas of the world, differing in degree of autonomy very appealing. I'm guessing one of the problems you're thinking is some of the capitals I wrote. But again, if country X is governed from the city Y, "city Y" is the capital of "country X" no matter what the rest of the world authorities say. If 120 countries come together and declare that 2+2=5, should we just accept that? Anyways, hoping to hear from you. Thank you very much in advance :) --Universal Life (talk) 20:26, 21 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I suggest this discussion continues at the article talk page rather than at your talk page and now duplicated at my talk page. Selfstudier (talk) 11:38, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Obiwana
...has been blocked for sockpuppetry. They then thanked the checkuser who blocked them. Either they didn't care about what you were saying to them, or they couldn't understand it. I'm thinking it was the second one. Either way, making sockpuppets to back them up wasn't a great move, but it certainly helped to end things quicker than it would've ended otherwise. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 00:45, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much for letting me know and for taking action. I also noticed that after Obiwana reverted my edits, both User:Ruskmox and User:Xi'anlo did exactly the same thing, Ruskmox wrote the exact same edit summary. Both of them referred to David Wilson in the same way Obiwana did, without any link. Because of all of this, I had the intuition that they might be the same person, but couldn't be sure.
 * I think he didn't care what I was saying to him. May be also partially didn't understand, but mostly didn't care. Otherwise he would have asked what I meant. --Universal Life (talk) 06:47, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I've got some experience with dealing with sockpuppetry, so upon checking the page history and seeing 3 accounts making indentical changes to the article, I basically had to report. It looks like Obiwana had been carving a trail of disruption (whether intentional or not) across multiple articles, so it is quite helpful of them to go down the route they did, rather than persisting with milder disruption. Mako001 (C) (T)  🇺🇦 10:55, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh my, this page really made me laugh. It also made me think all the possible nasty stuff people do in the WP, instead of just being considerate. Btw, I feel like you really have a good sense of humour :)) --Universal Life (talk) 11:12, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Ancient Chinese contribution on gravity
Hey i am hagemaruii I want to get the contribution made by ancient Chinese on gravity can you please research it and provide references i am only getting the facts that what chat gpt (an AI program is telling) but since you can do a very good research it is better to upload it. Hagemaruii (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2023 (UTC)
 * The account of the user Hagemaruii has been confirmed by a CheckUser as a sockpuppet of Obiwana (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
 * Hi Apaugasma, somehow I had a very strong feeling that he was Obiwana. Normally, I always immediately answer, but somehow I was reluctant with him. Thank you very much for letting me know that he was indeed Obiwana (and that my intuition was right) :)) --Universal Life (talk) 22:29, 3 February 2023 (UTC)
 * You're very much welcome. They may yet be back, so don't hesitate to gather some evidence and report when they do. In the mean time I wish you a very nice day, too! ☿ Apaugasma  ( talk  ☉) 22:38, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of countries and inhabited areas for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of countries and inhabited areas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of countries and inhabited areas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Note that I saw your message here after nominating the article for deletion, and have referred to it in the discussion here. Kahastok talk 17:12, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

List of countries and inhabited areas moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, List of countries and inhabited areas, is not suitable as written to remain published as discussed in the AfD in which you participated. I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption when you're able to given earthquake. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Star  Mississippi  15:22, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:List of countries and inhabited areas
Hello, Universal Life. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:List of countries and inhabited areas, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again&#32;or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)