User talk:Universal Studios Number 1 Fan/Archives/2008/01

Removal of copyright image
You might want to remove the Universal Studios logo from your userpage. Per Wikipedia policy, copyright images are allowable in article space ONLY. (I almost ran afoul of this one with an ARES logo, which as a licensed amateur and a member of ARES, I'm legally able to use personally. However, Wiki policy limits the use of images under copyright to articles only, so I have to respect that.)

Chances are that if you don't remove it first, one of the kind "bots" that patrol Wikipedia will remove the link. Just letting you know :-) Edit Centric (talk) 04:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

January 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Tijuana Brass (talk) 08:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Suspected sock puppets/Universal Studios Number 1 Fan for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ThuranX (talk) 23:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Marvel films
It's not a matter of opinion, I'm sorry. We have citations that specifically state they are NOT sequels, but reboots, new films. I suggest you carefully read our articles, and the relevant citations, so you fully understand the facts of the matter. ThuranX (talk) 03:18, 3 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Wow. just wow. no, Hulk is not BASED on the TV Show. The writers wanted more of that 'man on the run' feel that the show offered. Punisher is NOT based on 'different' comics, just a different approach. SPider-Man 4 has nothing on paper, that'st he fact, thus it's not 'official'. YOu don't understand the concept of citation. Read up on it. ThuranX (talk) 00:44, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

More sockpuppetry evidence

 * Thanks for the diffs. They and the harrassment you're now causing will be brought to your sock puppetry case, causing a total withdrawl of my acceptable of your earlier apology and of my willingness to guide you. Instead, I will push for a ban on your account and IP. ThuranX (talk) 01:09, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Last chance
All right, it's time for you to stop being disruptive if you want to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Many of your edits to Universal Studios-related articles have been helpful, but your behavior is unacceptable. If you can find a way to limit yourself to only working on articles and not harassing other users and generally causing problems, we're glad to have you. But the next time that you try taking a shot at another editor, use a sock account, or go back to being a nuisance to others, you will be blocked.

Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. If you're here to help build it, great. If not, then this isn't the place for you. Tijuana Brass (talk) 08:07, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

Reasons To Stay
I'm permanetly leaving Wikipedia, You may discuss this or post me reasons why i should stay in the area below. Thanks.--Universal Studios Number 1 Fan (talk) 02:00, 6 January 2008 (UTC)

I've decided to stay, But will not cause any more disruptions.--Universal Studios Number 1 Fan (talk) 16:33, 6 January 2008 (UTC)


 * Good.--Snowman Guy (talk) 20:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm still here
Hey there, I'm still present, but have been kinda busy this past week. First time back to work in over a week and a half (we take Christmas week off), so was busy getting stuff finished up in a short work week. I'm ready to get back to fixing the articles. Let me know how you'd like to proceed.

As to your original question: I'm wondering if you heard about these possible attractions through a focus group or similar survey that was conducted by Universal to gauge guest reactions to various concepts. These are common, and often they can predict what's to be built, but they may also never get off the drawing board. None of my other sources has heard of those possibilities ... again, that doesn't mean they don't exist and aren't under consideration, just that there's very little verifiable info on them. If you would post them on the talk page for the article, along with where/how you heard about them and ask for input, it might work well.

McDoobAU93 (talk) 00:55, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Punisher: War Zone
I don't know what your problem is, but you continue, time and again to commit edits that are against citation. Stop doing that. Readx articles, read citations. Don't move pages against citation. You have an outstanding Sock puppet report, and adding these other offenses only makes your situation worse. ThuranX (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I'm going to be perfectly clear here. Read an article before doing ANY edits about it. Do not edit the article, do not edit the talk page, do not edit the pages of associated editors. Read the article first. Odds are good your questions will be answered, and if not, you will at least be able to ask a specific question. ThuranX (talk) 03:09, 10 January 2008 (UTC)

SSP case
You've been blocked for two weeks as a result of this case: Suspected sock puppets/Universal Studios Number 1 Fan — Rlevse  •  Talk  • 15:57, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

RE:WP:AIV
Hello. I'm confused about your recent report to WP:AIV; the IP you reported is, as I noted, a constructive editor and has been so for the past day or so. Has there been a misunderstanding? Cheers, Master of Puppets   Call me MoP! ☺  00:04, 29 January 2008 (UTC)


 * I have removed your report without taking any action because the IP in question has not made any vandalism edits. Additionally, I have removed the warning notice that you left on the IP's talk page. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:21, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Simpsons Ride.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Simpsons Ride.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 02:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)