User talk:Unknowledge

Your disruptive editing
Since this is the second time you have been reverted over this edit. I would suggest you take your concerns to the talk page. Continued disruptive editing(removal of referenced information, removal of references, etc) can result in a block or ban. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:13, 12 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Kansas BearI think there is no vandalism that you can warn me.It is only a discussion.You can take my changes back and we we will discuss about this subject... Unknowledge (talk) 03:27, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

July 2015
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Turkish people, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. You changed a number, but the source cited does not support that number. agt x  03:12, 19 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Agtx I am a TURKISH as you see in my user page.Some of these CIA informations are wrong.I am putting a reference supporting my change.ThanksUnknowledge (talk) 03:20, 19 July 2015 (UTC)

Edit warring
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Kansas Bear (talk) 22:35, 4 August 2015 (UTC) Unknowledge (talk) 12:50, 5 August 2015 (UTC) Unknowledge (talk) 13:21, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * It is not edit war!There is an discussion about that page so we can put a template.Do not teach me rules, I know them.You are complete disruptive anyway.Kansas Bear
 * You can remain discussion in talk page instead of this approach and the template must be exist until there is compromise.

Reported for edit warring
See here. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:46, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Hi there, Unknowledge. While we all have our personal biases, we must strive to leave these out of our editing here entirely. The content of articles is only appropriate if it can be verified with reliable sources. Reviewing your editing, it looks like you are here to insert your own point of view into Wikipedia and not to contribute cited and verifiable material to the project. This can only hurt Wikipedia we do not allow that sort of behavior here. As I have determined you are not here to build the encyclopedia, I have blocked your account indefinitely. If you want to contribute, you're going to have to read the policies I've linked above and convince us you're willing and able to abide by them. Once you have done so, you may appeal this block, and you should read the guide to appealing blocks with information and advice on this process. Regards, S warm   ♠  00:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Δρ.Κ. λόγοςπράξις 17:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

I was blocked in English Wikipedia several years ago. I am a reviewer and a contributor in Turkish Wikipedia and I also want to make contributions to English Wikipedia. I know the rules and policies so I do not repeat the same mistake. Thanks in advance for your interest. Unknowledge (talk) 02:44, 5 October 2020 (UTC)