User talk:Unknown

Are you a real user?
This is a rather confusing username! MrBeast 20:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I am.
Yes, I know. Unknown 23:26, 16 August 2007 (UTC)

Whee.

Unknown (talk) 21:24, 17 August 2009 (UTC)

==Sockpuppetry case== Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Sockpuppet investigations/Lawlar for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. m o ɳ o 00:04, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * This was a mistake by user:mono - you have been removed from the case. Sorry about that, Airplaneman   ✈  21:39, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

I'm sure that you are very fond of your user name....
...but I think you also might agree that seeing "Unknown" might be confusing to people, making them think that somehow the editor involved couldn't be identified. Since your account was created so long ago, and because it doesn't violate any of the specific rules about usernames, I don't think that if I brought it to the attention of WP:UAA anything would happen, but I thought you might be amenable to changing it in some way that ameliorated the problem. I don't think you're under any obligation to do so, but it sure would be community-minded if you did so. Thanks, Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

I really do like my username
... and I have been using it for quite a while. I don't think it's causing any problems. Unknown (talk) 18:26, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts
Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry, I used Twinkle to report the other editor and instead of an unknown user, it marked you because of your username . Feel free to ignore the SPI altogether. Hearfourmewesique (talk) 14:18, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
 CatcherStorm    talk   17:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

As before, you are mistaken. Unknown (talk) 20:11, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
Legacypac (talk) 19:05, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

Miracle of Lanciano
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Miracle_of_Lanciano#%22Scientific_tests%22_-_a_joke

would you like to look at that page again?Mr. bobby (talk) 09:29, 27 December 2022 (UTC)

bjjrank
hey @Unknown! wanted to share w you the doc for the template to try to keep it consistent, thanks! RGNROK- (talk) 17:45, 13 January 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I'll keep that in mind. Unknown (talk) 17:54, 13 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Laputa for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Laputa is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Laputa until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Natg 19 (talk) 20:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)