User talk:Unknown assasin

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Xzeath, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:29, 24 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xzeath


A tag has been placed on Xzeath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:39, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Nova Society


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Nova Society, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheLongTone (talk) 17:57, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * In contesting the deletion of Nova Society, you wrote:
 * This page should not be speedy deleted as pure vandalism or a blatant hoax, because... (your reason here) --Unknown assasin (talk) 17:59, 25 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The Novas are important to me they are in my new book that im making and just in case no one understands, I want them to.
 * You have not indicated in your article that the Nova Society is an element of fiction. In writing about this organization as if it actually existed, you have (inadvertently, perhaps) perpetrated a hoax, as no such society actually exists.  This is not to say that I encourage you to recreate the article to clearly indicate that the society is an element of fiction, because as such, it is likely not notable (especially since you have not yet finished writing the book in which they appear).  If you finish the book and get it published, and if it becomes a notable work of fiction, then perhaps we can create an article about it.  But not until then.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:04, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * You have further written:
 * This is not innapropriat to anyone this article is for my book that im making the novas wont be explained in the book so I wanted to explain it on Wikipedia. Please do not delete this article
 * This indicates to me that you do not understand the nature of Wikipedia. We are building an encyclopedia of verifiable information here, not a free webhosting service for you to create backstory for your novel.  If that is what you need, you should try Wikia instead.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 18:07, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Fraggle81 (talk) 18:23, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

What Wikipedia is
It's an encyclopaedia that records things of note. Something that is 'in a book' that isn't apparently finished is not something that is of note to anyone but you. In time, if the book gets published by a good publisher and gets reviews in multiple sources, maybe. (Maybe too if it is self-published and really takes off - but this is unlikely, I'm afraid...) When something is of note, we prefer that someone not connected to it makes the article. If the person making the article is connected to the subject, we tend to think that they are trying to use Wikipedia to promote the thing - which is not allowed. I have deleted the article as a hoax purely because there is no evidence that it was true, and it did not say that it was part of a work of fiction (and as the book is not complete or published, we have no way of knowing if this is true or not anyway). Articles on Wikipedia must be referenced to independent reliable sources WP:RS, and we cannot have articles waiting for their subjects to become notable. As a writer myself, I wish you luck in getting published (not an easy thing in itself) and achieving notability. It's not an easy field to break into. Keep on going, and maybe we'll see your book with an article one day. If it doesn't work out, keep it as you can always recycle bits of it into other works, or rewrite it when you have more experience. All the best... Peridon (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2014 (UTC)
 * BTW Wikipedia cannot be used by an author to give extra information about his creation. We will report extra info published elsewhere by a notable author like J.K. Rowling in their article(s), but not when the author is the only source and is publishing this info for the first time. I advise you to put the explanatory info in your story - not always easy. Avoid the character explaining to newcomers in long paragraphs that earlier science fiction writers did, and also the 'overheard by chance conversation', which looks fake even when done by David Eddings (one of his weak points in some excellent tales...). Robert Heinlein tells you things without seeming to ("The door irised..." gives a lot in just three words. Explain when necessary, without unnecessary detail. And don't do it here... 8-) Peridon (talk) 19:02, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Xzeath


A tag has been placed on Xzeath requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 2Flows (talk) 18:15, 9 May 2014 (UTC)