User talk:Unnamed12

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
Cite your source when adding information to the lead paragraph that doesn't have a consensus among the editors, also, do not edit with a possessive form in POV for a nationality. Mechanical Keyboarder (talk) 10:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

ani
There is a matter with which you are concerned at ANI. Dlohcierekim (talk) 10:23, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
When you say "our nation's" in wikivoice — that is just a plain error, incorrectly assuming Wikipedia is American. El_C 19:27, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. ‑Scottywong | talk _ 06:02, 25 July 2019 (UTC)

Edit warring
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. El_C 00:27, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. El_C 00:51, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

July 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 01:00, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. ''Please also note that repeatedly inserting your preferred language into an article without engaging in a discussion on the talk page is disruptive editing. You can be banned for this type of edit warring, even if you do not exceed the 3 revert limit in one day.'' Wallyfromdilbert (talk) 02:42, 6 August 2019 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring, as you did at U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. -- Scott Burley (talk) 05:46, 6 August 2019 (UTC)

Your edits
You keep adding the same kind of page bloat that got you blocked before. Suggest you find something more constructive to do. - wolf  17:01, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

November 2021
Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to Grupo Especial de Operaciones. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you.&#32;- Sumanuil (talk) 22:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)