User talk:Unnamedsources8

January 2019
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page James Picard has been reverted. Your edit here to James Picard was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.facebook.com/unnamedsources8) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 08:10, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 16:50, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at James Picard. CLCStudent (talk) 17:01, 12 January 2019 (UTC)

You are going about this the wrong way
Wikipedia has a very strict policy on biographies of living persons and we can't go around making claims like you were making (on any page, including this one) without absolutely solid reliable sources. Your Facebook page (or any Facebook page) is absolutely not a reliable source for such purposes. So the other users were correct to revert you, though perhaps the warning was a bit harsh.

That said, you are free to call the article is a nausea-inducing piece of spam. At least, I will. I also agree something needs to be done about it. But slow down, read the pages I linked above, then feel free to comment on the talk page about the matter. If you think some of the article's sources are nonexistent or fabricated, that's okay to bring up, but claims about the man himself are not, unless, again, you have WP:RS to back them up. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:23, 12 January 2019 (UTC)