User talk:Unnithan1956

Nair
Hi. I've removed the "See also" links you added, because the "See also" section of an article is for links to related Wikipedia articles, and those articles don't exist -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 12:35, 13 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I've just done the same thing again. Please stop adding information in this way. - Sitush (talk) 12:54, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

'''Citing from convenient texts which are unrealibale is not the best way to create true history..

Offensive statements from - books of doubtful credibility however old they are - is not a good thing.

Too much vandalism in this page - hope wiki folks have a look at it.

''' The cock and bull stories of Sadasivan would have found a naive publisher in Delhi. But contains only a clever mixture of false statements and secret wishes.. It does not qualigy to be a book. Please remove all refereneces to this book..

August 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Nair. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 10:07, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nair, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 07:40, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Nair, you may be blocked from editing. Sitush (talk) 07:41, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Nair. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively. In particular, the three-revert rule states that: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Sitush (talk) 07:50, 18 August 2011 (UTC)
 * 1) Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.


 * Since you show no inclination to discuss, either here or on the article talk page, and are continuing to remove cited content, I have reported you to WP:AN3. Sorry. - Sitush (talk) 08:29, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Edit warring at Nair
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Nair. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3. EdJohnston (talk) 16:23, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Appropriate placing of messages
If you want to leave a message for User:Sitush, leave it at User Talk:Sitush. I have no idea why you just added a message to Sitush on User Talk:Unninair2000. Also, when you leave a message on someone's talk page, please put it at the bottom of the page, not the top. Wikipedia talk pages run from oldest at the top to newest at the bottom; if you put the info at the top, user's may simply never see your message. Qwyrxian (talk) 06:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

List of Nairs
You have recently made this contribution to List of Nairs. Please could you let me know the page number that you are citing and also the surrounding text (ie: not just the single sentence that you think confirms the person being a Nair). I am unsure whether the book meets the reliable sources policy requirements but let's just sort out the obvious stuff first. Thanks. - Sitush (talk) 16:10, 1 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I have replied to this question on Talk:List_of_Nairs.JanetteDoe (talk) 18:21, 1 October 2011 (UTC)

October 2011
Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article, Nair. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you. Sitush (talk) 08:07, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Salvio Let's talk about it! 08:49, 11 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Let me make something else clear. Not once have you attempted to have a discussion on an article talk page about any differences you may have with other editors. Sitush has commented on this in the first edit in this section, and he is correct. You also posted to the Clerks page about a dispute you say you are having. There are ways of dealing with disputes, but until you start discussions on the appropriate article talk pages you can't use any of those ways. If you continue to attack other editors you are likely to be blocked. Discuss the articles, not the editors. Dougweller (talk) 15:48, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. Salvio Let's talk about it! 17:12, 12 October 2011 (UTC)