User talk:Unomi/Archive/2010Dec

9/11 on the Fringe theories noticeboard
Just read through the RFC - I think my eyes are still bleeding from that madness! Oh boy - I hope that doesn't end up happening again, but I wouldn't be surprised, given the personalities of some people involved in the dispute. Ravensfire ( talk ) 05:02, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
 * If anyone would take a bet on the exact same thing happening again I could make out a very rich man, very quickly. un☯mi 05:15, 7 December 2010 (UTC)

Revert at AE
No I can't, I have no idea how that happened. I've not even looked at AE this evening.

The only thing I can think of is I clipped a rollback link by accident from my watchlist and never realised. Thanks for catching it. Regards, Wee Curry Monster talk 23:08, 18 December 2010 (UTC)

BOUML
Short answer: the block was for a mention of a defamation lawsuit. (the relevant part of the first diff may be translated as :'I have received several offers of judicial and financial help (from anglo-saxons people if you want to know), be glad I am not in this kind of mind'. The long answer is quite complicated with some parts in french. I think it is best to look at his contribs here, on commons and on the french wikipedia to have a better grasp of the problems. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, the translation done by talk of my sentence seems right, but unfortunately he missed to give the context, and as you know the context is always important. I said that to answer to a sentence of Esby saying (google translation) you have also accused several times of having censored your comments, I'm still waiting to know or I'll get you censored. I remind you that this is defamation, so Esby spoken first about pursuit, not me, and you have to know the same Esby insulted me on public through the IRC explaining why I also answer speaking  about (none) pursuit. But of course the main is my sentence explicitly said I will not do pursuit, contrarily to the reason invoked to block me. To be complete even this has no link with the current discussion, Esby was right, he never censored me, I confused him and Bapti and did later apologies to him for this error, even he never did apologies for his insults. Regards. Bruno pages (talk) 12:09, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Just so you know, the deletion of that article has been requested some time ago at Articles for deletion/BOUML. Regards, Comte0 (talk) 13:58, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

fyi
--Mbz1 (talk) 05:33, 19 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't you ever again insert your comment inside my comments. Use your own space. Even look of your multicolored signature makes me sick, and stop hounding my contributions and trolling on my articles. Find something else to do. Please have a nice day.--Mbz1 (talk) 22:35, 20 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Wrong link? u</b><b style="color:#815">n</b><b style="color:#715">☯</b><b style="color:#615">m</b><b style="color:#515">i</b></i> 22:39, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

Bambu
How could wikipedia make a change to a page when use Nahome has provided zero reference from the Bambu trademark office in Madrid or est. date? This is absolutely ludicrous, and makes no sense whatsoever.. There have been multiple publications which list Bambu's est. date 1764 in Spain.. This has been citationed on the site as well.. There is no reason for this to have be changed to a wrong date. The only thing isn't even a link its an obscure line of reference "supposably" researched from the Madrid trademark office. --ArnaudMS (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You could use one of those publications that list the date as 1764, no? <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#798">u</b><b style="color:#697">n</b><b style="color:#597">☯</b><b style="color:#497">m</b><b style="color:#397">i</b></i> 11:35, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Re, interaction ban
Re, your message, I don't see why it's important; I didn't talk to her, I didn't talk about her, mention her, I didn't comment in threads in regards to her. I didn't have anything to do with her, and six plus months later, she uncivilly insults me and requests a block in a thread that has nothing to do with her, and in a thread she knows nothing about, then subsequently files and SPI on me. If that isn't clear harassment, I don't know what is.—  Dæ dαlus + Contribs 22:41, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Certainly, I was simply trying to find some more background information, try to figure out how she was able to nurture the grudge for 6+ months. I was also interested in finding out if it related to I/P or not. <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#902">u</b><b style="color:#801">n</b><b style="color:#701">☯</b><b style="color:#601">m</b><b style="color:#501">i</b></i> 22:44, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Let me see if I can dig up the ban in WP:RESTRICT.—  Dæ dαlus + Contribs 22:51, 24 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Found it: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=351508445#Mbz1_is_at_it_again . There you go.—  Dæ  dαlus + Contribs 22:53, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * And I'm just going to clarify something here; I originally commented in Mbz1's SPI because I got her username confused with that of another sock I had previously got indef blocked for continued socking to edit war, .—  Dæ  dαlus + Contribs 22:55, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, the memories, this ani thread is where I first got involved. <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#646">u</b><b style="color:#545">n</b><b style="color:#445">☯</b><b style="color:#345">m</b><b style="color:#245">i</b></i> 23:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

discussion-top Template Tip
When using the discussion-top template always add, after the |, 1= that's it, just a number 1 and the equal sign and your signature will work. This will allow your signature to work, links to work, WikiLinks to work. Otherwise, the edit will save, but not appear, which you saw. Just a little tip. :) Take Care...<small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer  •  Talk  • 10:52, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, thanks! I'll keep that in mind. I'll leave it as is in this instance. All the best in the New Year. <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#672">u</b><b style="color:#571">n</b><b style="color:#471">☯</b><b style="color:#371">m</b><b style="color:#271">i</b></i> 11:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You're Welcome and the same to you in '11 :) - <small style="white-space:nowrap;border:1px solid #900;padding:1px;"> Neutralhomer •  Talk  • 11:29, 28 December 2010 (UTC)

Reformatting on USA terrorism
Thanks for doing that Unomi.V7-sport (talk) 11:07, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
 * You are welcome :) Happy New Year! <i style="text-shadow:grey 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;"><b style="color:#591">u</b><b style="color:#490">n</b><b style="color:#390">☯</b><b style="color:#290">m</b><b style="color:#190">i</b></i> 11:08, 29 December 2010 (UTC)