User talk:Unomi/Archive/2010Jun

ANI
Your comment at ANI is to be expected. Have a look at Harassment, which was until recently in WP:NLT - and is still linked (pointed out by NYB). If you oppose templates please take them to MFD. Verbal chat  06:27, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Verbal, I think that WP:AGF embraces the notion of you simply linking him to that section and ask him to clarify. I think we both realize the chilling effect of templating and how it can be perceived as less than congenial, if you did not in fact interpret it as a legal threat then what was the point of templating him in the first place? Unomi (talk) 06:38, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I disagree, the templates are worded neutrally so it is not seen as a personal attack, and the idea is education - so the same mistakes wont be made in future, or worse ones. If you have a problem with the template the take it up on the talk page. Also note that my comment at ANI was very clear that I did not feel threatened but that others might if it continues. Verbal chat  06:45, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you did the right thing in stating your position in the way you just have on ANI. Unomi (talk) 06:50, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

This made me laugh, I never though of it! Adding ARS tag. Could be seen as pointy though, or have an ulterior motive, but it's still funny. Verbal chat  08:36, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sometimes I think its ok to just do it for the lulz ;) With it's current wording it is pretty sure to be kept. Unomi (talk) 08:39, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Or, well, perhaps not, the current wording still relies on an implicit bad faith interpretation of the intent of ARS or at least of the intent of those who invoke it. That said, as long as wikipedia relies on the strength of argument rather than numbers... it still does right? Unomi (talk) 08:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

By the way, thanks for the strike. Now lets get back to hating each other (<--- joke) Verbal chat  11:13, 10 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi. Sorry to intrude. I always feel a bit weird diving into talk pages of people I don't know, and rarely do. But I came to see why you did the strike. Can I just say that most of what Verbal says in the final statement at Ani is false. I have taken most of the sentences and linked them to difs that diametrically contradict Verbal's assertions. He gets away with this because he knows nobody is interested enough to follow the diffs. Sorry, I can't just stand by and watch him do this. Anthony (talk) 15:07, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Anthony, please drop this. No one has time for it because it's a waste of time. Suffice it to say I refute your accusations, but I'm not interested in pursuing them and have never been interested in pursuing you. Unomi, apologies for this intrusion. Verbal chat  15:12, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Do what you gotta do Anthony, personally I see it as a bit of a lost cause, but then, I am increasingly growing a bit jaded and disillusioned with the whole peace, love and the sum of human knowledge that anyone can edit thing. Hell is more likely to freeze over than you extracting an apology from Verbal and God herself would get wheelwarred if she tried to sanction him. Nevertheless, perhaps the exercise will do you good. Unomi (talk) 15:17, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Unomi, I'm sorry ;) (I think this is the fourth apology I've made today, of which one directly above!) I was blocked once for editwarring, which I acknowledge and took with good grace - I misunderstood the BLP exception and felt it better to take the medicine than appeal. Verbal chat  15:20, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Make it 5. Bye! Verbal chat  15:28, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your apologies Verbal, it really does warm my heart :) Unomi (talk) 15:46, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Now you're confusing me, I though you would freeze over... maybe it's because I'm running a fever. Get your requests in now. Verbal chat  15:51, 10 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll have one sorry thanks :) I'm going. I'm going. Anthony (talk) 15:53, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Personal attacks
Unomi, I'm not sure what I've done to deserve the personal attacks (,, etc.) you've been writing about me lately, but I'd appreciate it if you would tone it down. Calling me an asshat and a drama queen is unnecessary and immature. If you are unable to tone it down, I will consider starting a WQA. Thanks. Snotty Wong  talk 15:57, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you should be considering a reading comprehension course instead. Unomi (talk) 16:27, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Unomi, please stop this. It's just gotten silly and looks like you're trying to WP:BAIT SW.. <b style="color:#C72">Verbal</b> chat  21:08, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, you are right, there is no point in continuing with it. Unomi (talk) 21:13, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Legal assessments of the Gaza flotilla raid
Hello! In this edit to Legal assessments of the Gaza flotilla raid you added a reference named "murray" but did not include an actual source with it. Could you please revisit the article and add the source you intended? Thanks. - Salamurai (talk) 00:00, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Whups, Sorry, I thought it was already in there. Unomi (talk) 00:05, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 01:28, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

JohnCD (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2010 (UTC)