User talk:UnorthodoxMinds

Nomination of The Black Water Society for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Black Water Society is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/The Black Water Society until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Everymorning (talk) 00:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

 -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  01:27, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest
Hey,, please be aware that you need to explicitly state any conflicts of interest while working on an article, specifically User:UnorthodoxMinds/The Black Water Society. I think we both know why I'm saying this: ™. Thanks,  Programming Geek  (Page! • Talk! • Contribs!) 12:59, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

Hey I must admit I am a bit confused by the "  TM  " you indicated? As there appear to be no trademarks listed for this project under that name in database searches? Also, I am not sure a conflict would exist if one were merely citing page length, genre, synopsis, and citing all things from direct local news, or Facebook pages, instagram, etc, as these are not opinions but just copy, cut, paste facts. There really could not be a conflict pertaining to those. I of course could see a conflict arise if one associated to the project were to add a section to the article pertaining to its reception and wrote biased reviews or things like that? Which I imagine no one associated with the project would want to take part in. Please elaborate as you are aware I am very interested in keeping this page alive until the local news outlets release their transcripts of interviews with the creators online so other's in Pittsburgh can begin adding info to the page from those articles. I appreciate your feedback, as always.


 * NOTE After reading the section on COI I can explicitly state that I am in no way receiving any financial benefit, stipend or pay for editing this, or any, wiki articles for that matter. UnorthodoxMinds


 * Are you not involved in the creation of the subject of the article? Quoting your own entry in the deletion discussion: "As the author of this project, which has been underway for 4 years, I have infinite more authority on the subject than this individual who had nothing better to do with his time than flag a page I created literally after 5-10 minutes." If you are involved as it appears, then you do have an external relationship with the subject of the article. That's what COI is. -- &#124;  Uncle Milty  &#124;  talk  &#124;  10:34, 30 March 2016 (UTC)