User talk:Unquietwiki/Archive4

Integrate
Thanks for looking after the Integration effort. Not sure what to do with it at this point: I find it hard to tell whats going on these days on here. Cwolfsheep (talk) 01:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It's fine as an essay. Projects are really forums where people can discuss broad matters. If people wish to discuss aspects of the ideas related to Integrate, they can use the related talkpage - Wikipedia talk:Integrate. Regards  SilkTork  *YES! 07:58, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:CatDiffuse
Template:CatDiffuse has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 03:10, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Chapman, Kansas
What needs verification? Everything is properly sourced, as far as I can see. Nyttend (talk) 02:22, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Census #s are off: one says 1200 & another says 2000+. I used to live there as a kid as well: I remember 2000 being a good #, but one wonders since the tornado. Cwolfsheep (talk) 02:23, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for catching this; it was vandalism. I've put the numbers back to the ones from the original version of the page, which was mined directly from the Census Bureau and thus reflects it accurately.  It must have been very old vandalism, because the percentage of Pacific Islanders was changed from 0% to 1%, and 0% racial statistics were removed several years ago from demographics sections nationwide.  Nyttend (talk) 02:51, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Rather old, to be sure; here is the edit that introduced the errors. It's over 3½ years old.  Nyttend (talk) 02:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Fast high a319.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Fast high a319.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude ( talk ) 06:01, 19 December 2009 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Windows library files
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Windows library files. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/Windows library files. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Methods of website linking
I have nominated Methods of website linking, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Methods of website linking. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 22:13, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Methods of website linking
I have nominated Methods of website linking, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Methods of website linking&. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. TexasAndroid (talk) 13:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Revision to Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire and Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri articles
I noticed that you have revised either Sid Meier's Alpha Centauri or Sid Meier's Alien Crossfire.

I intend to revise those articles following the WikiProject Video games/Article guidelines. There are more details on the discussion pages of those articles. I'd be interested in any comments you have. It would be best if your comments were on the discussion pages of the two articles.

Thank you.

Vyeh (talk) 12:55, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Is...
this the wikiproject you're looking for? --I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a message on my talk page. @ 04:39, 13 June 2010 (UTC) Thanks! Cwolfsheep (talk) 04:46, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of VGASAVE
An article that you have been involved in editing, VGASAVE, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/. Thank you.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - Ahunt (talk) 11:30, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Miami Intermodal Center
Cwolfsheep, I have updated the article on the Miami Intermodal Center. Please check it over and let me know if there are any other parts of it that need to be updated. Feel free to add to it yourself as well. -  Aalox (Say Hello • My Work) 02:20, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of LoseThos


The article LoseThos has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Adrian Willenbücher (talk) 08:36, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of U.S. Postal Exams


The article U.S. Postal Exams has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Not notable, these are just civil service exams.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 23:59, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Infosuicide
I've added a "proposed deletion" notice to Infosuicide, on the grounds that there is "no sign so far of "reliable sources" using this neologism; see also NOTNEO". See the notice for details of how to cancel the deletion.

My hope is that either someone finds proper sources that fit within the WP:NOTNEO rules, or the article gets deleted. My underlying concern is that I do not expect "infosuicide" to come into widespread use because the "suicide" part is too extreme. (I'm sure the concept will survive, but with a less jarring name. Infohermitage? Netvanishment?) Best wishes, CWC 12:47, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Summers obamadeficit.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Summers obamadeficit.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. &mdash; Train2104 (talk • contribs • count) 20:04, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Markpilgrimgone.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Markpilgrimgone.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:33, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Infosuicide for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Infosuicide is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Infosuicide until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Off2riorob (talk) 01:32, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Elder Sign card game being played.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Elder Sign card game being played.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 05:39, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Google tribbles.jpg)
Thanks for uploading File:Google tribbles.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:32, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

ESE (teaching) listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ESE (teaching). Since you had some involvement with the ESE (teaching) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Beeblebrox (talk) 18:19, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

Notification of proposed deletion
Hi. I've just nominated Category:Conservative universities and colleges in the United States for deletion. See WP:CFD under today's date for the discussion. --Orlady (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 22
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conejo Grade, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Incline (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:Thuletrail.png)
Thanks for uploading File:Thuletrail.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 19:54, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Alternative media (U.S. political left) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alternative media (U.S. political left) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alternative media (U.S. political left) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  |  03:35, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of 512k day for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 512k day is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/512k day until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 21:54, 10 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Christian politics
Category:Christian politics, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. SFB 23:06, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Stone (software)


The article Stone (software) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * software article of unclear notability, lacking independent references, tagged for multiple issues since 2012

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dialectric (talk) 18:48, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of AeroText


The article AeroText has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (software) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:50, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Minicar RSV


The article Minicar RSV has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:52, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of SolgamesUSA


The article SolgamesUSA has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (companies) requirement. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back. Thank you,

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on |the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 08:54, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Solgamesusa.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Solgamesusa.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Category:Web operating systems has been nominated for discussion
Category:Web operating systems, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. SJK (talk) 10:50, 29 January 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Business Plot, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Third party. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 9 April 2016 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedia Integration (Reviewed) has been nominated for discussion
Category:Wikipedia Integration (Reviewed), which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor(talk) 22:25, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Comparison of Python based data storage
Hello, Unquietwiki. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Comparison of Python based data storage, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Triptothecottage (talk) 05:51, 26 April 2017 (UTC)