User talk:Unrulyevil

This is a general cautionary note, on many of the articles you have edited recently, you have replace words with their synonyms, but the synonyms have not retained the context of the sentences... —Preceding unsigned comment added by Leevanjackson (talk • contribs) 16:48, 11 October 2009

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Lee&there4;V (talk  •  contribs) 15:48, 11 October 2009 (UTC)

Please remember to mark your edits as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' --John (talk) 07:45, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

January 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Tramp, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 09:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Strange synonyms
I would agree with the note at the top of your talk page - an edit such as this one (rewording "exotic seasonings" to "mysterious seasonings" and "sweet balsamic vinegar" to "delicious balsamic vinegar") did not improve the article, and made it harder to understand. If English isn't your first language, I'd stick to basic copyediting, rather than trying to replace descriptive adjectives with synonyms.

You should also check WP:MINOR before marking any more of your edits as "minor" - "any change that affects the meaning of an article is not minor, even if the edit concerns a single word". Thanks. --McGeddon (talk) 12:03, 5 January 2010 (UTC)

Please do not make test edits to articles, as you did with this edit to Badnjak, even if you intend to fix them later. Such edits constitute vandalism, and will be reverted. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Aruton (talk) 04:33, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not replace words with synonyms if you aren't sure what those words mean, and please stop marking all of these edits as minor, if you are unable to distinguish minor grammar edits from synonyms that significantly alter the meaning of a sentence. --McGeddon (talk) 09:07, 6 January 2010 (UTC)

Minor edits
Please stop marking all of your edits as minor. Only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit'. Reverting vandalism and changing one word to a synonym you possibly don't understand the meaning of is not 'minor', and should not be flagged as such. --McGeddon (talk) 16:48, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Tornado. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. This is the fourth time you have replaced a word with an inappropriate or ungrammatical synonym, with no explanation. McGeddon (talk) 10:18, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)