User talk:Unspokenreasons3255/sandbox

Peer Review
I am reviewing Rayceiry Sanz's work (Unspokenreasons3255). The following is a link to her work(User:Unspokenreasons3255/sandbox).

The lead section section for this addition to the Human uses of animals article accurately and concisely states the message of the additions. The lead section is an informative summary that covers the largest points of following sections. The organization of the authors additions are largely clear and logical. However, it may be simplified by including the section on Ethical concerns with Animal Assisted Therapy as a subsection of Animal Assisted Therapy. The content provided by the article is relevant, informative, well cited, and presented in an unbiased, neutral manner. Images are appropriately captioned and are relevant to the topic of the text. The references used span a variety of authors and are primarily from within the last 10 years, and appear to not be missing any key information. Overall, the tone and structure of the article is good, and the content is informative.

Gjcrew (talk) 05:29, 12 December 2020 (UTC)