User talk:Untitledmind72/Archive 4

Survivor: Samoa application reference
Please do not change the application reference link again. The correct link is the dead link. The link you are trying to add is for future seasons (21 and 22), not the current season. So even though the link is dead, the reference is correct. —Gogo Dodo (talk) 18:53, 22 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: Survivor: Samoa edits
Re your message: I removed it because I could not find any mention that he wrote the Survivor: Samoa theme on his website. Which section lists that as a credit? —Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:57, 22 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Re your message: That will work. Sorry about being so hard on you with the references to the Survivor article. If you look at the history of the article, you will see a lot of people trying to spoil the game with wrong information that is totally unsourced. So I have a rather hard view on things that are added without references. —Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:56, 23 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Feel free to contribute to any of the article. You can add articles to your watchlist if you want to monitor progress on particular articles. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 00:24, 25 November 2009 (UTC)

Survivor: Tocantins tribe colors
Hi. This is the anonymous user that replied at the end of the "New Tribe Colors" section in the "Survivor: Tocantins" talk page. While I do agree with the old colors being too bright and inaccurate, I would like to propose a somewhat different set of colors. I used the OS color picker and picked those from the original Buff design pictures on CBSstore.com.

I would like if you may consider:

instead of:

—72.10.114.92 (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Brett
I'm failing to see how your edits make him any more relevant or notable enough to have a Wiki article. Bueller 007 (talk) 01:47, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * It's a stub already. "Stub" articles are supposed to be expanded into full articles.  This guy isn't notable enough for either one. WP:ONEEVENT Bueller 007 (talk) 03:14, 22 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Just wait to see what the results of the deletion debate are. An admin will take care of it. Bueller 007 (talk) 18:20, 22 December 2009 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Kashi Company
Hello! Your submission of Kashi Company at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Calmer  Waters  02:08, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Citation templates
I noticed that you have twice removed the use of the citation templates from Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains to a hard-coded style. The style of the citations used in past seasons of Survivor is to use the citation templates. The hard-coded style output that you used is very similar to the output of the citation templates, so I don't see any particular advantage of hard coding the style. If you think that the use of the citation templates should be changed, please bring it up on the talk page. Thanks. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:39, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Survivor Samoa table
Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 16:56, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains
Re: your message: I don't think semi-protection is needed at this time. It was pretty bad before the premiere with various anonymous IPs trying to spoil things with wildly different claims of who finished where. As I suspected, things settled down once the premiere was shown. If previous seasons are any indication, it will probably start up again when some popular player either gets voted off or makes some stupid move. You won't be able to semi-protect the page yourself as only administrators can do so. You would need to make a request at Request for Page Protection. There are at least three administrators who regularly follow the Survivor articles, so generally one of us catches too much vandalism going on and takes the appropriate actions necessary (blocks or protections). -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:27, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Re your message: Convention has been to load The game table with the next episode when the name of the episode is known. For the ratings, the next row is added when the usual source, TV by the Numbers, has the ratings available.  Usually that is fairly early in the morning the next day, but sometimes (like today), it is delayed.  The biggest thing to watch on the ratings table is that all of the numbers need to be sourced as people tend to post all sorts of differing numbers. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:49, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Re your message: I noticed that you had added that. For past seasons, two hours shows have been condensed into a single set of numbers covering both hours.  You might want to wait awhile before fixing thing though.  Nielsen ratings have both a preliminary and final set of numbers.  It is better to wait for the final numbers before fixing everything.  TV by the Numbers will have the final ratings later today. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:09, 12 February 2010 (UTC)


 * As you can see, ChaosMaster16 changed the table to the usual format with the final numbers. The weekly ranks usually come out on Tuesday. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 22:38, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Re your message: The format of the articles has indeed involved over the seasons to what it is now (your example with Guatemala has to do more with somebody not completing the work to make it look like the current season than being inconsistent). I still don't think it is necessary to note why there was a schedule change as I don't think it matters all that much. Sometimes an episode will shift to Wednesday or skip a week for whatever reason. But bring it up on the talk page and see what other editors think about it. If it is decided to be included in the article, I think it shouldn't belong in the Nielsen ratings in an effort to explain ratings changes, but instead in the Game table. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 23:55, 29 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Thank you for leaving a message. The reason why wikipedia usually uses two decimal places is because of various reasons. First, the reference, TVBTN, and PiFeedback forums, use two decimal places. Second, two decimal places usually is more pleasing to the eye. If the number is 12.309, rounding it up would save room and time. 12.31 is straight and to the point. 1-5 is rounded down. 5-9 is rounded up. If I mis interpreted your question or if u have any more, please feel free to message me.ChaosMaster16 (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2010 (UTC)ChaosMaster16

BLP
You probably already saw this, which was started after this post. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 21:20, 2 April 2010 (UTC)

Template:Double space
The two templates Template:Double space and Template:Space double are used to format quotation marks in a manner to separate them from quotation marks used in a link. How can I get this to work for apostrophes? This is mainly for citation templates, in which the website is put in quotes; however, some web titles have apostrophes at the first word, and I need to make this easy to read. How can I get the citations to look like the following (this is what it would look like as an actual reference list):
 * ^ Dehnart, Andy. Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains' ... etc.

instead of...
 * ^ Dehnart, Andy. "'Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains' ... etc.

I hope y'all can understand what I'm asking for. Thanks! —Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 01:27, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Why can't you use Template:Double space in the cite, as you have done above with Template:" ' AKA Template:Double single? What article is this for? (leaving the helpme template in case someone else has a better idea)   — Jeff G. ツ 01:42, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Because the quotation mark is part of the citation template already. I think perhaps  is what you're looking for, as it includes a 0.1em space to the left of the apostrophe.  However, there doesn't seem to be an equivalent version with space to the right. (leaving the helpme template in case someone else has a better idea) --Darkwind (talk) 01:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Why use the apostrophe at all? Looking at Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains ref. 3 says,


 * See Survivor_20.  Chzz  ►  02:22, 20 April 2010 (UTC)


 * (Marked this as done; use another if that doesn't answer)

Ah - hold on; I see what you mean now; I didn't quite understand from the above truncated example. So, you can use "nowiki" - like this.

title = &lt;nowiki>'&lt;/nowiki>Survivor: Heroes vs. Villains&lt;nowiki>'&lt;/nowiki> ready to spar

OK? If not, reinstate the helpme. Cheers,  Chzz  ►  02:46, 20 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Broncs4199/samoa
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 23:34, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
Hi. I've added the flag for you. You might want to review this edit though - oops! :) Pedro : Chat  20:27, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:S19logo.svg
A tag has been placed on File:S19logo.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 20:59, 29 April 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:1005thepeak.svg
A tag has been placed on File:1005thepeak.svg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 21:18, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Jury vote table heading
Actually, it could probably be tweaked a bit more. I just thought the additional row was somewhat redundant, but there is probably a better solution. I don't care if you want to change it to something else. Once we decide on something, we should make them all consistent. Thanks! Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 23:15, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor.australia.logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Survivor.australia.logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:21, 9 May 2010 (UTC)


 * I saw your question about your traced logo. Just as a heads up, we generally discourage users from tracing logos themselves, as it is nearly impossible to accurately 100% recreate a logo. It may in fact even be illegal to make a redrawn knock-off, and claim it is the official logo. Large companies pay thousands and thousands of dollars and branding, and we should respect their vision and design. That said, it is often not that hard to locate official logos in vector format. Often PDFs contain the vector information that can be extracted. They may even have press and media packs with EPS files. So in summary, I'd ask you to consider not hand re-drawing or tracing logos, but instead source all branding content to official sources. Thanks for your consideration. -Andrew c [talk] 14:03, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Templates done, as requested
— SMcCandlish  Talk⇒ ʕ(Õلō)ˀ  Contribs. 23:36, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Animal Farm cover.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Animal Farm cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File:FreeRice grain totals.png
Just letting you know that your graph File:FreeRice grain totals.png for the FreeRice page is over a year out of date. If you still have the file, you may want to consider updating it :) — Code Hydro  23:27, 10 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I can't seem to find the file on my computer...it may be hidden though. Should we remove the graph and leave just the table? —Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 19:39, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Or I could build a new graph based off the one I made in the effectiveness section of the article. Before I do so, I'm waiting for you to let me know whether you mind me replacing your image.— Code Hydro  19:49, 11 August 2010 (UTC)


 * I guess I'll just replace your image now. It's been over a week without a response from you. — Code  Hydro  21:47, 19 August 2010 (UTC)


 * Oh dear, I'm very sorry for not replying...I don't think saw the gold "new message" bar at the top of the page :( ...I really do apologize for that. Anyway, I think replacing the image the best possible option since I have lost the file. Go ahead! Thanks! —Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 22:17, 19 August 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem :) I've already replaced it ;) — Code  Hydro  22:21, 19 August 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Season20.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Season20.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:54, 30 October 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Survivor Nicaragua logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Survivor Nicaragua logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Armbrust Talk  Contribs  17:48, 29 January 2011 (UTC)

Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged revisions, underwent a two-month trial which ended on 15 August 2010. Its continued use is still being discussed by the community, you are free to participate in such discussions. Many articles still have pending changes protection applied, however, and the ability to review pending changes continues to be of use.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under level 1 pending changes and edits made by non-reviewers to level 2 pending changes protected articles (usually high traffic articles). Pending changes was applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't grant you status nor change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Acalamari 16:37, 31 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:ORG logo.png


A tag has been placed on File:ORG logo.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip [i.e. a Word document or PDF file] that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Untitledmind72 (let's talk + contribs) 15:14, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

Peer review of 1982 Asian Games medal table
Hello Untitledmind72, as you're a member of WP Olympics, would you like to being a part of this peer review. If you've any interest than please follow Peer review/1982 Asian Games medal table/archive1..thanks  undefinedBill william compton  Talk   10:48, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SlipstreamMainMenu.png
Thanks for uploading File:SlipstreamMainMenu.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:SlipstreamPurpleEnergy.png
Thanks for uploading File:SlipstreamPurpleEnergy.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add OTRS pending to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at File copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in [ your upload log]. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Ron h jones (Talk) 23:38, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

World Factoring Yearbook
I'm leaving this message as you're listed as a current participant of WikiProject Business. I was informed yesterday that the current World Factoring Yearbook (circa £150) is now free for download as an ebook. It's a matter of filling out this form. I'm not sure if you'll find this useful as a reliable source, but I thought I should let you know that it's freely available online. I apologise in advance if this doesn't interest you! All the best, The Cavalry (Message me) 15:16, 23 February 2012 (UTC)

Gettting Wikimedians to the Olympic Games
Hi. I am part of an effort to get Wikimedians access to the 2016 Summer Olympics as accredited reporters and photographers. Part of this effort includes covering the 2012 Summer Paralympics. Two Wikimedians have credentials to attend these games as reporters through Wikimedia Australia. As English Wikipedia does not allow original reporting, this is largely through Wikinews with a project page found at Wikinews:Paralympic Games. If you are interested in helping to get Wikimedians to the next Summer Olympics,I'd encourage you to assist with Wikinews efforts, and also to work on all language 2012 Summer Paralympic Wikipedia articles before, during and after the Games to demonstrate a track record of success. Thank you. --LauraHale (talk) 04:05, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Slipstream (game)


The article Slipstream (game) has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Unsourced and failing WP:GNG since 2010.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 20:29, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smule company logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Smule company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:52, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

File:InsurgoRemixMacOSX.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:InsurgoRemixMacOSX.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Kelly hi! 14:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

File:FreeRice grain totals.pdf listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FreeRice grain totals.pdf, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 13:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:49, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smule company logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Smule company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:10, 13 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Candystand in Safari 3.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Candystand in Safari 3.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. XXN, 18:11, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who like NationStates
Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!- 🐦Do☭torWho42 ( ⭐ ) 06:06, 16 December 2017 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Smule company logo.png
Thanks for uploading File:Smule company logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:52, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:DOT ORG (ORG Marketing Resources logo).png
Thanks for uploading File:DOT ORG (ORG Marketing Resources logo).png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of File:S19logo.png


The file File:S19logo.png has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "replaced by file:Survivor samoa season nineteen dvd region 1.png as lead image of Survivor: Samoa..."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Also:
 * File:Survivor Redemption Island logo.png

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 24 March 2022 (UTC)