User talk:Upabnela1986

Referencing
Hi, I removed your edits where you added articles from "hubslide.com" as sources. These articles on hubslide.com seem to be, for the main part, copies/adaptations of wikipedia articles. They are therefor not reliable sources. - Takeaway (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Green fireballs
I tried finding mention of "green fireballs" and/or Dr. "LaPaz" in the source that you added to the article Green fireballs but didn't find any. I.e. the website can't be used as a reference for the article. - Takeaway (talk) 17:53, 12 April 2016 (UTC)

Turkish literature
I tried finding mention of "The history of the broader Turkic literature spans a period of nearly 1,300 years." in the source tat you added but couldn't find it. Your edit has therefore been reverted. - Takeaway (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Hubslide.com?
Is there any specific reason that you constantly use this website as a reference in many of your edits? As far as I can see, it is a user-generated website and unsuitable for use as a reference for Wikipedia articles. Even when the website "collects" content from elsewhere, it is far more reliable to use the original content as a reference instead of hubslide.com due to the fact that the content could have been altered in hubslide.com.- Takeaway (talk) 17:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)
 * You still are adding this same user-generated website as refs or as external links to wikipedia articles. Please stop. User-generated website are not reliable as refs. - Takeaway (talk) 22:49, 16 April 2016 (UTC)