User talk:Updates-for-you 2018

Welcome!
Hello, Updates-for-you 2018, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to National Aviation Academy. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:


 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 23:46, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

 * Hi Updates-for-you 2018! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission.  I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
 * The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
 * The Teahouse new editor help space
 * Wikipedia Help pages

-- 13:36, Monday, September 10, 2018 (UTC)

National Aviation Academy
Hi there, thanks for your work on National Aviation Academy. I've added the refimprove tag back as there are still quite a lot of statements without references. Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 20:29, 17 September 2018 (UTC)

Help me!
Please help me figure out where more citations are needed on the National Aviation Academy page. Other than citing their website itself, I am not sure how else to go about it. Also, how do I add their logo image? It says I am not able to...

Thank you, Updates-for-you 2018 (talk) 15:35, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Hi there. I'm not up on images, I'm afraid, so will leave someone else to answer that. Re the National Aviation Academy, a key one is probably the date the academy was established. The sentence is "National Aviation Academy (NAA) was founded in 1932 to train Airframe and Powerplant technicians with approval of the Federal Aviation Administration.". So it's a question of Googling or looking in printed sources for a reliable sources that confirms this date. Does that help? Best wishes, Tacyarg (talk) 16:24, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * A couple of citation examples which may help: Grosvenor Crescent: the first citation after the first sentence is to a Guardian newspaper article online. And National Liberal Club: the first citation here is to a book called The Gentlemen's Clubs of London. leaving help request open for someone else to comment on images Tacyarg (talk) 16:42, 19 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Accounts need to be 4 days old and made 10 edits before image upload. Then look at some logos (Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:Non-free_logo) to see how they are correctly formatted. Ron h jones (Talk) 17:54, 19 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The File Upload Wizard is the tool of choice for uploading non-free images. You'll have to explain why the image meets the criteria for non-free content, and you have to make sure that it's low-resolution (no more than 100,000 pixels in total, which should be easy here).
 * Regarding the references, I'd say pretty much all of the content needs proper referencing. I checked the current sources; one is about accreditation by the accrediting organization (and says that the accreditation was renewed "with stipulation"; why is that not mentioned in our article?); two others do not mention the National Aviation Academy. I'm not sure whether the last one is independent or written by NAA staff. Wikipedia content should be a summary of what reliable third-party sources such as newspapers or reputable magazines have reported about a subject. If we instead rely on what a subject wants to be said about itself, we're not writing an encyclopedia article but an advertisement. With statements such as "offers seven unique certifications built around the industry’s need for specialized avionics technicians with detailed knowledge of the wiring", "geared towards the future demands of the aviation marketplace" and so on, to me it seems that's pretty much what has happened here. Huon (talk) 19:25, 19 September 2018 (UTC)