User talk:UpliftGuy

December 2016
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Uplift modelling, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. ''These do not qualify as reliable sources. Personal homepage. Link to scientific journals if possible. Almost identical edits from another user have been recently removed.'' Hannibal Smith   ❯❯❯  02:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * This is very strange. The articles refer to premier journals and conferences! These are the algorithmic implementations of uplift modeling that have been published in peer-reviewed journals! How can't top-tier CS journals not count as "reliable resources"? All citations are proper conference/journal citations, with listed publishing venues, pages, and dates. Please familiarize yourself with academic publishing. Now some live links do link to personal pages. This is because most journals is by subscription only (or you have to pay). All academic institutions have subscriptions with major journals/conferences, so academics can access the articles for free. One workaround is to link to the main author's version, which is free and often on their website. Example:

"Relational Differential Prediction", paid journal version, free version. A simple google search will show you this. We can remove the links if this is something bothersome, as they don't add to the validity of the citation itself. UpliftGuy (talk) 17:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)


 * Removed all links to personal page, replaced them with either unique paper DOI, conference/journal site, or NCBI links if authors transferred ownership to public domain. A simple google search did the trick. Cheers! UpliftGuy (talk) 18:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)