User talk:Uponleft

Warning
Per arbitration committee ruling, disruptive single purpose accounts on the St Christopher article may be banned. Guy (Help!) 22:09, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

You are the one being disruptive, you are going counter to other editors that have already established consensus on the talk page for that article. Read the talk page and discuss instead of just adding and reverting. Uponleft (talk) 22:10, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked this account as a disruptive WP:SPA per Requests for arbitration/St Christopher. I am absolutely sure that this is not a new experience for you. See also Requests for arbitration/St Christopher. You were subject to a 1RR restriction which you broke, we have had so many disruptive single purpose accounts whitewashing this article that I don't see any point stringing it out any longer. Guy (Help!) 22:32, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * You have really stepped over the line. You banned an entire group of accounts that were doing nothing wrong, completely outside of the guidelines setup by the ARBCOM. You are so incredibly abusive it's hard to believe you still have admin tools. Uponleft (talk) 22:35, 12 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Is the wrong answer. I blocked a group of largely inactive disruptive single purpose accounts.  I tend not to leave obvious sockpuppets hanging around for a second bite at the cherry.  Guy (Help!) 22:38, 12 July 2008 (UTC)