User talk:Uprightmanpower

Ignore all rules

September 2012
Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the  link at the top. The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). Michaelzeng7 (talk) 02:42, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Threatening with a lawsuit would be a weird thing to say for a new user who just got blocked for the first time and is trying to get unblocked. Think it through buddy. XD -- Marco Guzman, Jr Talk  20:42, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

You are right... thinking about trashing this account and creating a downright man.--Uprightmanpower (talk) 21:04, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Or, if the standard offer still stands, you can stop editing Wikipedia for at least six months and then see about starting over. 72Dino (talk) 21:31, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * How will I know if it still stands or not?--Uprightmanpower (talk) 21:43, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Admins are keeping an eye on this and related accounts, so one will likely be by soon and can let you know if it is still available to you. And if one does not let you know in a reasonable timeframe, I will ask an admin to let you know. 72Dino (talk) 21:45, 12 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks. I didn't expect this from you after all that has happened between us. That's very kind of you. I'm just itching for an edit(especially after Berean Hunter posted that fantastic link on your talk page. Now I can see so many new alumni and faculty with Wiki articles). I can sure wait 6 months.--Uprightmanpower (talk) 21:58, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
 * The standard offer is always open, but it is never a guarantee. It's more a prescription for the minimum circumstances under which we'd consider letting a disruptive editor return. It helps if, during that time, you do something on another wikimedia project to demonstrate your good faith. In additional, when you file your unblock request (you'll need to do that from your main account), you'll need to explain how you intend to change your behavior from that which got you blocked before. Note that even a single instance of sockpuppeting automatically resets the 6 month minimum, and every time you sockpuppet you decrease the chances of ever being accepted back into Wikipedia. Qwyrxian (talk) 00:32, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

I will come back in May 12, 2013. I haven't been a disruptive editor for a long time. The only reason I get blocked everytime is because all users can reopen the old Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000.--Uprightmanpower (talk) 01:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Actually, you have been disruptive almost every day because you are editing when you are not supposed to. Being a sockpuppet, especially, multiple times, IS being a disruptive editor.  I just wanted to make sure you were aware of that because it doesn't sound like you were (but repentance is a good thing for us all). 72Dino (talk) 02:22, 13 December 2012 (UTC)


 * This account is very disappointing. I'm sorry you decided to continue to create sockpuppets instead of waiting out the six months and start fresh. 72Dino (talk) 03:33, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

I will come back in May 20, 2013.--Uprightmanpower (talk) 07:25, 20 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Maybe. Please recall in a comment earlier that "every time you sockpuppet you decrease the chances of ever being accepted back into Wikipedia". Your chances of ever being able to return are getting slimmer and slimmer. 72Dino (talk) 15:03, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

I just saw the comment on 72Dino's page. I want to make things clear. First, I am not a troll, please refrain from calling me names like "troll" or the likes. This sock-puppetry started when Mangoeater1000 was unblocked and free to edit. I was editing through Mambo420 and was receiving barnstars from administrators. I only had three accounts till then and I was using only one account(Mambo420) to edit. I mostly used to edit NYU, NYU-Poly and related articles back then. One day, I encountered Marco Guzman Jr while editing [], I removed a self-aggrandizing, self-hosted link of Cal Poly, Pomona which also contained wrong information. I pointed that out and that is how the Sockpuppet investigations/Mangoeater1000) restarted. Marco saw it on NYU-Poly talk-page. I didn't remove it from there because I am not a vandal, but now I regret for not doing that. Originally the case was for Mangoeater and Appleeater. The Wiki offer is for vandals, not for constructive editors. I modeled the NYU-Poly article after Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute. Both Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and New Jersey Institute of Technology need maintenance templates. I added 80% of the informations that you see in the NYU-Poly article. I also added many informations to other technology-related colleges. My goal was to make massive inprovements in this field. I removed many weasel and peacock words from many articles.--Uprightmanpower (talk) 00:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)