User talk:Upsidedown8

Image tagging for Image:349729633_2da8d99e68.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:349729633_2da8d99e68.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 06:51, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to The upsidedown
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Upsidedown8! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but please note that the link you added in is on my spam blacklist and should not be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an Imageshack or Photobucket image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was genuine spam, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 08:40, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on The Upsidedown, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add  on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Rosemary Amey 02:58, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Please do not remove speedy deletion tags from articles that you have created. This is considered vandalism. Please use the talk page to discuss the article. janejellyroll 04:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:Seattle 2006.jpg
Thank you for uploading Image:Seattle 2006.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Longhair\talk 04:04, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

The Upsidedown article.
Congrats, you passed the AfD. Remember,though, it passed with "no consensus", which means since we couldn't agree on what to do, it defaults to a "keep". That does mean that while it stays for now, it's not exactly "safe". I would suggest you keep improving the article to help it's chances if it goes up for AfD again. Remember to use outside sources at all times, particularly since (I assume) you're a band member and need to avoid a conflict of interest. If you need any help, go ahead and ask, I'll see what I can do. --UsaSatsui 03:29, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Nomination of NW Shoegazer Bliss for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article NW Shoegazer Bliss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/NW Shoegazer Bliss until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The SandDoctor Talk 05:23, 5 October 2020 (UTC)