User talk:Urabura

January 2019
Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, RMS Carpathia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 20:59, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * Hi, I see you reinstated with the xomment "What source? Can the name Carpathia come from Mars?".
 * You can use any reliable published source you can find that supports the statement. Please look at the links above for more guidance.
 * In the meantime, do not reinstate your edit without a source. Not only does that violate sourcing guidelines, but it's considered edit-warring. TJRC (talk) 21:22, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on RMS Carpathia; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TJRC (talk) 22:41, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

A complaint was filed about your edits
Please see the report at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Someone has claimed you are edit warring at Metropolitan areas in Poland and other articles. You can respond there if you wish. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 04:28, 21 February 2019 (UTC)
 * - today, in Polish Wikipedia, user:Urabura was blocked for an indefinite period as sockpuppet-account (yes, User:Urabura is sockpuppet) . This user is well known vandal on Polish Wikipedia who create new sockpuppets to disruptive edits (total 18 sockpuppets). Subtropical -man  ( ✉  | en-2 ) 15:05, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

February 2019
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule, as you did at Metropolitan areas in Poland. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:44, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

Warning
- You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; you remove sources content and add wrong or unnecessary information without prior discussion. Oliszydlowski, 22:41, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for edit warring and violating the three-revert rule. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. --jpgordon&#x1d122;&#x1d106; &#x1D110;&#x1d107; 14:19, 12 April 2019 (UTC)

May 2019
Hello, I'm NekoKatsun. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Mount Everest, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your edit also appears almost entirely unrelated to Mount Everest itself, and may be more appropriate on another article. NekoKatsun (nyaa) 20:04, 29 May 2019 (UTC)

Warning
- I will not engage in another edit war because it is pointless. If you stress the changes discuss them. The current history section has enough images. Jan Matejko paintings are not encouraged as they are imaginative, though quite nice. The lead is a summary of "THE MOST" important information or basics. Trzebnickie Hills are not as important nor well known. Oliszydlowski (talk) 15:13, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

It's not about the picture, it's just an event. They did not take pictures in 1611. It doesn't matter if Trzebnickie Hills are known or not. It is important that these traces were found in them from 500,000 years ago.


 * You need to discuss this as it creates clutter and sandwiching. There is a separate article for History of Poland. You have been warned sufficiently and now you are engaged only in vandalism and not proper editing that can contribute to Wikipedia and benefit users. Please respect the talk page. Oliszydlowski (talk) 15:32, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

In my edition there are only facts that are already included in this article, so they are correct and I do not need to discuss anything. Stop misleading others that something in my editions is incorrect!!!


 * Never stated that it is incorrect. However, per Wiki policy, it is healthier if you discuss changes on Poland talk page and also if you stop implementing these changes until a discussion is achieved. You are sandwiching and cluttering text (violating Manual of Style/Images), you refused to engage into discussion and you clearly stated that your edit is based on "your opnion" which violates Neutral point of view. A lead is "serves as a summary of most important contents" per Manual of Style/Lead section. Trzebnickie Hills are neither mentioned nor necessarily important. Moreover, you began warning me about nothing. Stop engaging in vandal-like activity and edit wars like you have in the past please and respect discussion boards. Oliszydlowski (talk) 15:50, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Everything you wrote to me also applies to you. Why do you think only you are right?


 * You are being simply disrespectful. There is neither right or wrong until a discussion is achieved. I do not violate any of the Wikipedia policies. And please sign your messages so there isn't any confusion. Oliszydlowski (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

No one else but this graphic removes you, so you ONLY have a problem. It means there is something wrong with you.


 * You are engaging with Harassment and personal attacks against me. I will not further continue this discussion as it is not worthy. Oliszydlowski (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

(Personal attack removed) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Urabura (talk • contribs)

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. In English or Polish, attacks on an editor are unacceptable here. —C.Fred (talk) 17:57, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you. The4lines &#124;&#124;&#124;&#124; (You Asked?) (What I have Done.) 17:17, 5 May 2020 (UTC)


 * There is also currently a discussion involving you at WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. —C.Fred (talk) 17:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Edit warring at Poland
Hello Urabura. You've been warned for edit warring at Poland per a complaint at the noticeboard. You may be blocked the next time you revert the article unless you have received a prior consensus for your change on the talk page. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 21:11, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

May 2020
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for making personal attacks towards other editors. Please see for example this ANI post, Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bishonen &#124; tålk 00:44, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

Poland
Please stop WP:SANDWICHING and cluttering the tourism section in Poland article. It is enough for this small section, moreover, Śnieżka is not a renowned attraction domestically or internationally. Oliszydlowski (talk) 08:59, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please consider Wikipedia rules and policies under Reverting and achieve a Consensus next time. Oliszydlowski (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Please consider Wikipedia rules and policies under Reverting and achieve a Consensus next time. This is your last warning before I report you for continuous vandalism and disgusting behaviour. Oliszydlowski (talk) 16:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Another warning
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Next time please discuss the need for the Polish Soviet War in the lead. It did not affect statehood (because it was won), unlike World War I and World War II. Moreover, the period also saw other conflicts, whether of greater or lesser importance. The lead section is a place for summaries and not a list of victories or defeats. Merangs (talk)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
 * It influenced the statehood of many countries! If Poland lost, it would not be Poland, and then probably also a few other countries, because the bolsheviks intended to occupy most of Europe! Urabura (talk) 11:26, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

March 2022
 You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:45, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

December 2023
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 21:44, 31 December 2023 (UTC)