User talk:Uranographer

Nice work on expanding the I Love Lucy article - it was a sad stub that I took pitty on nearly a year ago and it now is starting to shine. --mav 05:51, 24 Apr 2004 (UTC)


 * Thanks! :-)  It's always been one of my favorite TV shows and I felt it deserved more (and more still, if I ever get to it)

In what ways can condoms fail other than by tearing or coming off? Adam 09:39, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Well, I was referring to condom use in general. If they aren't put on and taken off at the right times and in the right way they certainly aren't effective.  And, however unlikely it may be, there is always the potential for manufacturing defects (e.g, microtears or holes) which might not even be noticed as "tearing".  Also, the term "condom" doesn't necessarily imply latex or polyurethane, and it has been shown that HIV can pass through natural membrane condoms.  Those are some potential reasons for condom failure that come to mind.  I don't know of any research that has disproved these or shown that there are any others.  In any case, it seems like a stretch (no pun intended) to imply that tearing or coming off are the only way that condom sex can fail to prevent HIV transmission.  Doesn't it? Uranographer 03:46, 19 Oct 2004 (UTC)

And the Band Played On
Hi, Uranographer. I left you some comments on the talk page of this article. Please don't be offended, but due to POV issues and uncited claims, as well as MOS breaches, I had to revert your changes to the section about Gaetan Dugas. However, I think there's much room to improve that section. I look forward to discussing itm with you on the talk page. --Moni3 (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

Welt
Good question. One of my friends threw a credit card at me during track practice. Somehow it caught just the right air current and zipped at light speed into my neck. --Liface (talk) 11:46, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Help Survey
Hi there, my name's Peter Coombe and I'm a Wikimedia Community Fellow working on a project to improve Wikipedia's help system. At the moment I'm trying to learn more about how people use and find the current help pages. If you could help by filling out this brief survey about your experiences, I'd be very grateful. It should take less than 10 minutes, and your responses will not be tied to your username in any way.

Thank you for your time,

the wub (talk) 17:43, 14 June 2012 (UTC) (Delivered using Global message delivery)

May 2014
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=609917818 your edit] to Anne Sullivan may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:39, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Keller, who was in search of a teacher for his 7 year old deaf-blind daughter [Helen Keller|Hellen]. Michael immediately recommended Anne for this

Disambiguation link notification for November 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Josh Hammond, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brotherhood. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:17, 30 November 2015 (UTC)