User talk:UrbanScion

Blocked
What alternative is there? The alternative of you showing that you can respect and follow Wikipedia guidelines and processes by not socking. Since you are blocked in part for socking, you need to request unblock from your original account- since your talk page access was removed, you need to use WP:UTRS. You also seem to be saying that it's other people's fault that you were blocked, when you were blocked for what you did, not because of others. When you sock and evade your block, you are showing that you have no respect for the policies and processes here. Why would we want someone to edit who will not do what the vast majority of people do here and follow policy? You need to show that before you contribute, not after. Again, if you intend to continue socking no matter what happens here, then there is nothing else to talk about. Someone else will review(and likely reject) your request.331dot (talk) 08:33, 29 April 2019 (UTC)
 * I don't intend to continue socking if there's an actual viable means of getting unblocked, it was an action taken as a last resort. I did want a fresh start though, I know that isn't necessarily a policy you approve of but I had wanted a clean slate after years had passed. Never meant for it to escalate to this stage. I don't blame other people for my original block, but I do blame Yamla for what I feel has been a combative attitude when I tried to do the right thing and be honest with my appeal onZombiedude101 only to get a slap to the face. Blocking my talk page access and clamping me down wherever I tried to speak and spouting walls of text about rules and policy without care or consideration for context didn't endear me. I lost faith in the process and went down my own way because of it because that sometimes feels like the only means of getting anywhere. I'd also like the contributions I made to be reinstated because I spent actual time and effort on them. UrbanScion (talk) 09:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)