User talk:Urcuyo

Copyright problems with Citibank Nicaragua
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Citibank Nicaragua, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). As a copyright violation, Citibank Nicaragua appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Citibank Nicaragua has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Citibank Nicaragua and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Citibank Nicaragua with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Citibank Nicaragua.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you.

Speedy deletion nomination of Luis urcuyo


A tag has been placed on Luis urcuyo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO  A&E&uArr;  02:14, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Urcuyo


A tag has been placed on User:Urcuyo, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 03:12, 27 December 2011 (UTC)

Urcuyo vs. Citibank
Case 1:97-cv-04341-kmm

This is perhaps the longest case in history brought against a bank. The Urcuyo vs. Citibank case was first initiated in 1997 brought by a lawsuit against Citibank. the banking giant has managed to utilize his resources to ridicule the laws of different nations in Latin America and the United States.

Despite the Urcuyo family winning the unanimous verdict by a jury, awarding the family with the return of their money, the bank managed to persuade the courts to nule the decision of the jury.

It managed to completely ignore the voice of the People of the United States of America. For complete information please visit luisurcuyo.blogspot.com or contact via email

Urcuyo said that, when the banking giant decides to act like a father as promised with the Urcuyo's money, they cannot be respected. the lawsuit is currently at $32,000,000 US from what could have been settled for the initial demand in the United States for about $300,000 US.

The lawsuit is now at the Nicaraguan Courts and it is also managing to manipulate the courts in that country as well. For interview visit Urcuyos blog.

Luis Urcuyo was largely involved in the case brought against Citibank in the United States back in 1997. Urcuyo has written several articles exposing the bank to the public. Francisco Urcuyo has been on several televised interviews accusing the bank of stealing his family's money without response from the bank. Urcuyo has questioned the dignity in each of the individuals aiding the bank to continue to ridicule the laws.

There are also some articles regarding the bank keeping the Urcuyos money calling the banking giant the Citi Grinch.

Contributors to this article are Francisco Urcuyo Muñoz, son of Dr. Francisco Urcuyo Maliaño and wife Maria Luisa de Urcuyo as well as grandson Luis Urcuyo who is the son of Francisco Urcuyo Muñoz. Both have been responsible for the lawsuit Urcuyo vs. Citibank.

--Urcuyo (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Luis Urcuyo--Urcuyo (talk) 21:22, 22 December 2012 (UTC)