User talk:Urdna/Archive 1

Watch what you revert, deletion is not always vandalsim
Your revert almost seems automatic, did you even look at what my edit did. THe stubsensor project is a project that uses both bots and people to remove stubs tags from articles that are no longer stubs. The bot lists articles and divides them into 25 pages of 25 sections, each section has 20 links. A user signs up for the section by putting their signature in the sections heading, when finished, the user delets the section. I finished the section I had signed up for, and then removed it. The instructions on the page (that if you had read you would have known about) tell members of the stubsensor project to remove their secions when they finish.

Your revert was careless because you neglected to take the time to see what you were reverting, and just reverted it. I will re-delete my section, which is not vandalism. If you had even read my edit summary you would have known what I was doing. If you wish to reply you can do so here or on my talk page. Also the history of that page never shows you edited it. What are you doing? Urdna 15:40, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * I’m sorry UrdnaI am working with a new Bot that is in the Beta stage, that goes nuts once in awhile. You were right in stating it almost looks automatic. That is way I have the statement “…If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me.”  Sorry for any inconvenience  any way I can make it up to you.Shoessss 15:46, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * Oh ok, its fine, It would help if you posted something on your user page saying that you were running a bot in the beta phase just to let everyone know. Also a sugestion for you bot; it would probaly work better if it only ran on the main namespace because talkpages are deleted or archived often and the bot might revert these.Sorry for my abruptness in my first post, I understand what happened now so don't worry about itUrdna 18:58, 15 May 2007 (UTC)


 * P.S. I did tke your advice and place a "Disclaimer" on my user page.  Thanks for the input. Shoessss 22:34, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Regarding the Article "Suryapet"
Hey Urdna,

Could you please provide me detailed information regarding the article "Suryapet" cleanup. I will appriciate your efforts to make Wiki a very quality place.

-Kishore


 * Kishore, I have put some information on the Suryapet talk page with the reasons I tagged it for cleanup. If you have any other questions feel free to ask. Thanks, Urdna 16:43, 23 May 2007 (UTC)

Your review
I reviewed you. I included some criteria to a good RfA in there. BTW, I love your vow to not vandalise WP. : ) Evilclown93 19:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the review, I really appreciate your advice and will try to take it to heart :) Urdna 20:23, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Re: Helpme
Hi

The reason I posted helpme on Las Bela (princely state) was because of vandalism by 153.29.160.34 - who has gone on to vandalise Mike D'Angelo and who has vandalised a number of pages, notably Jesse Jackson -

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jesse_Jackson&diff=prev&oldid=121715731.

Many Thanks

77.99.58.134


 * Oh ok, thanks for letting me know! I'll put that user up to be blocked on wp:aiv to be blocked, in the future when a page is being vandalized often by multiple users you can request semi-protection or just give the user the vandalism warnings escalating them each time until they have received them three times and then put the username up to be blocked on wp:aiv. Urdna 21:15, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Appjet.gif
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Appjet.gif. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:01, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Appjet
An article that you have been involved in editing, Appjet, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Appjet. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 13:20, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

24 WikiProject
Hello there, I see you are on the 24 WikiProject. It's been quite dead for some time now, and me personally, I intend to revive it. I considered maybe even a 24 Portal, i see the project founder hasn't been on Wikipedia for nearly a year. What are your thoughts on the project? Are you still interested in it? And would you help revive it? Let me know, I would intend to help out a lot, maybe "take over" the founders position, well not take over, but possibly help lead the project? Was just a thought and I wanted your input. My talk page would be the best place. Cheers, Steve Crossin (talk) (anon talk) 19:46, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Note, the above message is what Steve Crossin asked me to say to you. The  Helpful   One  (Review) 18:48, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

lala
dude you aren't in the category wikipedia users who listen to video game music??? cuz apparently i am. Lord mortekai (talk) 23:29, 19 October 2008 (UTC)