User talk:Urfriend.raj7

Welcome!
Hello, Urfriend.raj7, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Pilog India Pvt Ltd, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type help me on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Biblio worm  19:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Your first article
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of Pilog India Pvt Ltd


A tag has been placed on Pilog India Pvt Ltd, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Biblio worm  19:33, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

October 2015
Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to E-commerce in India. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:32, 11 October 2015 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced or original content. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   05:23, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

This is your final warning. You may be blocked from editing without further notice the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to List of eCommerce company in India. —  Jeff G. ツ (talk)   05:32, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Sundaykart for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sundaykart is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Sundaykart until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. sst✈ 16:18, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing, including removing an "Articles for deletion" notice from an article, and blanking the deletion discussion page, evidently in an attempt to prevent the discussion from taking place. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice:. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 19:53, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Warning on use of multiple accounts
It looks very much as though the accounts Special:Contributions/Urfriend.raj7, Phanendhra7, and Royalprince474 are run by the same person; if not, then the accounts are certainly run by people acting together. You should be aware that Wikipedia's policy on sockpuppetry does not allow the use of additional accounts to attempt to give the spurious impression in deletion discussions that there is independent support from other, unconnected, editors. Editors who use multiple accounts for such apparently deceptive purposes may have all their accounts blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 13:54, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Cashkaro.com for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cashkaro.com is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cashkaro.com until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 15:33, 30 September 2016 (UTC)