User talk:Urihc

Welcome!
Hello, Urihc, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review By Randy (SirLladnar (talk) 07:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC))
= Share the love SirLladnar (talk) 07:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC) =
 * The article explains the different types of excreta well, with good detail and comparison of the different excreta.
 * At the very end, the article lists it mentions the EU and U.S. in regards to countries and their regulation on excreta. However, I think it would be interesting to expand this section and list more examples of countries and either their regulations on excreta or the use in the specific country.
 * I was impressed by the inclusion of examples of excreta being reused to find precious metals, but I would like this section to be expanded more and find more ways excreta is being used other than farming.
 * The sentence "The importance of social norms and cultural perceptions needs to be recognized but is not absolute barriers to adoption of the practice" needs to be edited for grammer — Preceding unsigned comment added by SirLladnar (talk • contribs) 02:51, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

= Lead Section SirLladnar (talk) 07:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)=
 * The lead does well in including both the benefits and risks of using excreta, neither supporting or opposing the use of it. It allows for further detail to be given later on, without giving a biased view as the first thing the viewer reads.
 * The lead introduces every topic that is touched on later on the article, allows for readers to quickly understand the broadness of the topic before delving deeper into details

= Reliable Sources SirLladnar (talk) 07:14, 20 November 2019 (UTC)=
 * There are a multiple sources that are .coms and that should be checked for their reliability
 * A few pages cannot be found once the link is clicked
 * There are a lot of Phd thesis and other scholarly writings in the references which is good — Preceding unsigned comment added by SirLladnar (talk • contribs) 03:01, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Peer Review Feedback
Hi! I think the introduction is very well written and gives people a good idea of what reuse of excreta is and will also help people understand what the rest of the article will be about. There is a good use and distribution of media throughout the article that is effective in helping the audience visualize the effects/use of excreta for a number of purposes. I think this article does a good job of encompassing a lot of topics concerning or directly related to "Reuse of Excreta". Overall, this article was really well written and thoroughly developed while still remaining neutral. - Pauline