User talk:Urizur

Speedy deletion nomination of ArtPro
A tag has been placed on ArtPro, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add  on the top of ArtPro and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Hairhorn (talk) 16:47, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

ArtPro
Unfortunately, your article has been deleted. The major problem was the tone with which the article was written. It basically read like an advertisement with no visible non-advertisement content and no secondary sources to establish notability. If you feel as though this article was about a notable subject, you should feel free to try again. I would strongly suggest that you first start by assembling a list of secondary sources (e.g., news articles) and then start by writing down a list of all the facts about the subject. Avoid using pronouns like "I" and "we", as it makes it appear as though the article was written by the company. You should also read WP:COI. Thanks! Plastikspork (talk) 20:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Copyright problems with Noam Zur
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Noam Zur, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.artpro.co.il/condcomp/Noam%20Zur%20CV%202010-9%20eng.pdf. As a copyright violation, Noam Zur appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Noam Zur has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Noam Zur and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Noam Zur with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Noam Zur.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While contributions are appreciated, Wikipedia must require all contributors to understand and comply with its copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hairhorn (talk) 14:54, 16 April 2011 (UTC)