User talk:Urmichatterjee/sandbox

Peer Review by Cecilia
Absolutely fantastic work on the description of the movie! You have citations, links, and a great writing style! I think the link under "train to Pakistan" might not be relevant, though, as it leads to the Wikipedia page for it and doesn't really have anything to do with the film, I'm assuming?

I would also encourage you to look over the "Collaboration with Bapsi Sidhwa" paragraph again to make sure it's not too opinionated/lacks citations.

Further, add something by Mehta about this film too! I think it would be interesting to hear what she has to say about this quite fascinating work of hers. Good job overall! Cbschramm (talk) 21:54, 29 March 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review - Hans
I think you have a lot of really good stuff here. The one thing I'm mostly concerned with is how deep you go into synopsis for the Elements trilogy. Maybe this would do better on the film's page, while focusing on the general themes and/or relation to the filmmaker here? If you can find BTS info that'd be great. Hlqu16 (talk) 16:38, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

Professor Schreiber feedback
This is a terrific start, Urmi. I like the fact that you are adding a detailed plot summary of EARTH, and I think that you have done an effective job of capturing the narrative trajectory of the film. I agree with Cecilia that it would be interesting to add a quote or two from Mehta in your description.MJSProf (talk) 17:48, 15 April 2018 (UTC)

Peer Review Response to Cecilia, Hans, and Dr. Schreiber
Thank you so much for the feedback! I added more about Mehta to each of the films. In terms of the plot summary (Hans), I felt that it was necessary to add a little bit of what each film in the trilogy is about so I could talk about Mehta's thought process/opinions while making the film. I also added more citations! Urmichatterjee (talk) 05:32, 21 April 2018 (UTC)