User talk:Urso

Wet and messy fetishism
Hi Urso, I added the link to Female ejaculation again. I do think that topic is close enough to the subject of the article to be included in the "See also" section. I think I should mention that the "See also" section is there to point to articles that are similar in nature, not 100% the same or part of the main article. If the information linked to in "See also" was supposed to be that closely related, it would be instead included within the main article itself. Since this is a trivial matter, if you remove the link again, I won't put it back. I ask you to consider leaving it in though. Robotman1974 14:42, 29 November 2006 (UTC)
 * Hi Urso, You can go ahead and add those other links you mentioned if you want. One thing you could do is to divide the "See also" section into those links which are part of WAM and those which are not, though I must say I still can't see why that would be needed.  I think it is generally understood that the "See also" section exists outside the main article and is only there to point to articles which are related.  I think Female ejaculation should be included because it can make things both wet and messy, in the literal definition of those words. Robotman1974 15:00, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Image:CorinaUngureanuCover.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:CorinaUngureanuCover.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add , without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. MECU ≈ talk 03:47, 30 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lotion-Play
While categorizing this, I added Comment to your note there; the admin that closes the discussion looks for either 'comment', 'keep' or 'delete' (& variations, like weak or strong keep/delete), this just makes their job easier. If you wanted to actually comment "keep" or "delete", please go back to to the AfD page and change your entry. SkierRMH, 23:16, 7 January 2007 (UTC)

new lotion play article
I've done a little cleanup on the layout of the article. I don't read or write Japanese though, so there's still very little I can add. There are tons and tons of Japanese sites out there if you google "ローションプレイ", but I don't know what any of them say. I'll ask over at the Japanese Wikipedia for more citations. Many of the editors there read English, so that might help. — coe l acan t a lk  — 19:36, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lcc1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lcc1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 14:32, 15 August 2007 (UTC)

Re: Lcc2.jpg question
You were appropriating a commercial image to illustrate a controversy. The book cover depicted, a) living people and b) the leotards worn by them at the time. A free image could be created to depict either, or both. If you would like to contest the initial deletion, WP:DRV is the proper channel. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 21:31, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Was this image created to illustrate the controversy? It appears to be a publicity image created to promote the event/gymnasts, any use not consistent with this goal could be seen as infringing on copyright. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 19:36, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lotionplay.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lotionplay.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:34, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Lostaurelia_1.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Lostaurelia_1.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Kned001-corina.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Kned001-corina.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 16:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)