User talk:Ursul pacalit de vulpe/archive1

A tag has been placed on Ion Morei, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template   to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. pablomismoundefined 19:57, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Disruptive edits
If you continue disruptive edits, you will be blocked from editing. `'Miikka 07:26, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

You've already reverted the Moldova and Moldovan language articles 3 times each. Please beware of WP:3RR. Alæxis¿question? 09:16, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Three-revert rule warning
You have violated the three-revert rule at Moldova. As you are a new user, I will, rather than blocking you this time, warn you that edit warring is an unacceptable practice and will result in a block from editing. Please be careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution if an agreement cannot be reached, rather than engaging in an edit war. Seraphimblade Talk to me 10:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Seraphimblade. What exactly do we have to do when we don't reach an agreement? How can I present such a dispute resolution?--Tones benefit 14:06, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
 * If you have to reach agreement, you have to discuss with people in article talk pages. Otherwise the simplest solution will be blocking you from editing for disruptive behavior. Since you are trying to edit already established articles, it is your job to convince others that your edits are justified. `'Miikka 16:40, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Blocked
You are blocked for 24 hours for revert warring. I seriously doubt that you are a new user. Nevertheless I don't care as long as you will edit in the way admissible in wikipedia. `'Miikka 16:30, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Map
Please don't modify maps created by other people. If you think that the change is necessary, please talk to the person who created the map. I don't think he was an idiot. Nost probably he had serious reasons to waste his time and do what he did. `'Miikka 16:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

Georgia
Why did you revert economy section in this article? Tamokk 03:20, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Moldova and NATO
Deleted. Please write article to the point of the subject. Please don't write essays. `'Miikka 18:59, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * I repeat again: write article to the point of the subject. What's unclear? No one is interested to read about the history of NATO in the article titled Moldova and NATO. `'Miikka 19:04, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Ah, got the idea. I will focus only on the Moldova and NATO.--Tones benefit 19:06, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Budapest
Please don't add various pieces that are not directly related to the topic of the article. `'Miikka 19:02, 2 July 2007 (UTC)

Second block
This is your second block for revert wars. If you continue your disruptive editing, you will be blocked indefinitely. `'Miikka 16:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I know you wanted to block me, that's so obvious but you don't know how to count. It's not 3 revert war. I ask you to show me where are the 3 ones?--Tones benefit 16:38, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Here is only 3 times http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Foreign_relations_of_Moldova&curid=19249&action=history --Tones benefit 16:40, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

If you don't repair your mistaked someone else will and you'll be sorry for that. I wait your appologies.--Tones benefit 16:41, 3 July 2007 (UTC)


 * Once more: stay away from edit conflicts, or you will be banned from  wikipedia for disruptive editing. `'Miikka 16:43, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

Now I will wait but after that I will report you. You'll be sorry for this.--Tones benefit 16:49, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

The guy only has three reverts SosoMK 20:21, 3 July 2007 (UTC)

I reported Mikka's behavior on WP:ANI
I suggest you stay cool and calm down. It's never a good idea to systematically revert all by yourself. In the future, try to build up some consensus on talk pages. However, I find the actions of Mikkalai rather arbitrary, so I reported him. Dpotop 17:29, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Ahh..ok, I rather wish to concentrate now on Moldova's union with Romania. I've seen Alaexis is trying to catch me and after that Miika to block me for edit warring.--Tones benefit 17:30, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

last warning
One more revert war like this, and you will be blocked from editin indefinitely. `'Miikka 17:47, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

Block escalation
You are blocked for 1 week for disruption of wikipedia by repeatedly jumping into the revert war in an article with serious edit conflict, Georgia (country). `'Miikka 18:19, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I ask admins to unblock me taking into consideration the followings: 1) you can see from my contributions that today I wanted to help a person (User:Sosomk) who was blocked illegally and in a discriminating way, I posted the Discrimination act done by Admin Miikka against the Sosomk editor on , 2) there is a conflict of interest between this admin and the way he acts on articles, he block us, and he reverts our work, see. I ask admin, as another editor, Dpotop started on WP:ANI an investigation against the admin that blocked me: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=prev&oldid=142872489#User:Mikkalai_uses_admin_power_in_content_disputes_against_User:Tones_benefit "User:Mikkalai uses admin power in content disputes against User:Tones benefit", and as Admin Luna Satin said, that's a clear example of conflict interest.--Tones benefit 18:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

I have several questions:

--Tones benefit 18:46, 6 July 2007 (UTC)
 * 1. Why is admin Miika trying to eliminate me and User:Sosomk from the articles?
 * 2. Why does he not apply the same rules to other compatriots of his? (E.g. User:Alaexis)?
 * 3. Why does he not contribute to the articles and to the talk page instead of just reverting our work?
 * 4. Today I made just one edit on the article Georgia(country), why am I blocked? He said, You are blocked for 1 week for disruption of wikipedia by repeatedly jumping into the revert war in an article with serious edit conflict, Georgia (country). What?? Can you see what's so obvious that he wanted to eliminate me and User:Sosomk from that article?

For my case and User:Sosomk's it's a clear case of WP:DISPUTE as it was suggested by others.

Note: This user is a suspected sockpuppet of banned user:Bonaparte who is engaged in the typical pattern of revert warring and inciting hatred between editors of different nationalities. `'Miikka 19:02, 6 July 2007 (UTC)


 * For the record, User:Sosomk had a perfectly valid WP:3RR block. I have ploughed through the edits. --Anthony.bradbury"talk" 22:30, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Hi, I've answered you here. :Dc76 21:22, 13 July 2007 (UTC)