User talk:Usandthembraindamage

yeet

Welcome!
Hi Usandthembraindamage! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! isento (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Re: Edits to album era
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Album era, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say or does not directly relate to the topic of the article. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. isento (talk) 18:25, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

RS 500 songs citations
Hi – thanks for adding the latest rankings for Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs. Just for future information, you don't have to repeat a citation three times, like you did on "Bohemian Rhapsody"... you can combine duplicate citations by giving the first one a reference name, like this:, and then simply using   for any subsequent uses. See WP:REFNAME. Richard3120 (talk) 19:25, 16 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks from me also for making these additions.
 * Can I ask, though, why are you writing the title of the Rolling Stone piece as, eg, "In My Life ranked #98 on Rolling Stone 500 Greatest Songs List"? That is not the title – the title is "Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs" (or whatever). I think a more accurate phrasing – since the url takes us to a specific song entry each time – would be something like: "Rolling Stone's 500 Greatest Songs: 98. The Beatles 'In My Life'". JG66 (talk) 06:42, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Rock and Roll Hall of Fame edit
Per the list at Updated list there are 8: -- ☾Loriendrew☽  ☏(ring-ring)  00:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
 * 1) The Beatles - A Day in the Life
 * 2) The Beatles - HELP!
 * 3) The Beatles - Hey Jude
 * 4) The Beatles - I Want to Hold Your Hand
 * 5) The Beatles - In My Life
 * 6) The Beatles - Norwegian Wood
 * 7) The Beatles - Strawberry Fields Forever
 * 8) The Beatles - Yesterday

Highway to Hell
Just wanted to say a quick thank you, for this edit and updating the reference also, wish we would see more of that. - FlightTime  ( open channel ) 02:31, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Rolling Stone 2004 Rankings for "Louie Louie"
Thanks for the recent edit on this. I'm confused, though. The previous source had "Louie Louie" at #54 for 2004 (https://www.rollingstone.com/music/music-lists/500-greatest-songs-of-all-time-151127/little-richard-long-tall-sally-55174/) while your source had #55 for 2004 (https://web.archive.org/web/20080619072533/http://www.rollingstone.com/news/coverstory/500songs/page). They're both Rolling Stone sources, so why the discrepancy? Any thoughts? Relbats (talk) 22:34, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)