User talk:Usarcher

Speedy deletion nomination of Coby Moscowitz
Hello Usarcher,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Coby Moscowitz for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. War wizard90 (talk) 01:32, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Coby Moscowitz for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coby Moscowitz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Coby Moscowitz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  03:37, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

January 2015
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Coby Moscowitz. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. &#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;  &#9743;(talk)  04:17, 15 January 2015 (UTC)