User talk:Uscalldaway

Charlie Bone and the Red Knight
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Charlie Bone and the Red Knight, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add  to the top of Charlie Bone and the Red Knight.  brew crewer  (yada, yada) 05:52, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

it's fine
hi. don't worry about the page. if you put the speedy deletion tag on the page, it should be deleted shortly. but it's incorrect to blank pages. if you have any questions, feel free to ask me. all the best, -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 06:06, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

ATR
Thanks for reverting my edit in that All That Remains page. For some reason I thought that they were at Mayhem Fest last year, when they really weren't. I don't know what I was thinking... TheWeakWilled (talk) 14:29, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

June 2009
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Cradle of Filth, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. magnius (talk) 22:02, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

skillet
all right. i was going to change it back anyway because i got symphonic rock and neo-classical rock confused. honestly though, no one else has discussed the genre and they do have some classical parts in a lot of their newer songs. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.36.111.17 (talk) 18:01, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

The Black Dahlia Murder page
Genres mentioned in the infobox should reflect what's mentioned in the article. To call TBDM only a "heavy metal band" would be a half-truth and misleading. --Danteferno (talk) 17:49, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The problem with that analogy is that Metallica are (unarguably) a heavy metal band, whereas "TBDM" are a metal and metalcore hyrbid, according to reliable sources on the page. "More aggressive"? Who cares what you think they sound like? You should read up on Wikipedia's policy on No Original Research. (WP:NOR). Also, you might want to check out the band's talk page: TBDM's own frontman admitted to metalcore/hardcore influences and being part of the metalcore scene. Either change back to "metal/metalcore band" or leave as "American band", I don't want to get a Wikipedia administrator involved in this.--Danteferno (talk) 21:20, 23 August 2009 (UTC)
 * You're talking to the wrong person about that. There's a section on Wikipedia that verifies that kind of stuff. --Danteferno (talk) 02:01, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
 * The explanation for the suspicion was stated in my post to the admin, which you read, apparently. You shouldn't have anything to worry about if the other username/IP isn't you, so why are you worried about it?


 * Also, one thing I noticed in the archived discussion about TBDM: One of the "they're not metalcore!" people conceded TBDM played metalcore on earlier releases. Fans state they still play older material LIVE, so even if we were going to debate on what the band "sounds like", it would be irrelevant, as both the "core" and "melodeath" genres would apply. The band is by no means a "solid" heavy metal band. Again, the band's own label promoted them as "hardcore-influenced death metal". I don't think Brian Slagel is a metal amateur. --Danteferno (talk) 04:08, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 20:33, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

August 2009
Please do not attack other editors. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. See  Shii (tock) 23:06, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm glad to see it. Stay cool and keep on improving the article. Shii (tock) 23:20, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Talk:The Black Dahlia Murder. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Zhang He (talk) 23:30, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Re: TBDM
Problem solved. --Danteferno (talk) 01:14, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

WP:MOS
The relevant policy is here; the relevant sentence is "Do not replicate stylized typography in logos and album art, though a redirect may be appropriate". Hence, no KoЯn, no SOil, no KISS, no DevilDriver. 20:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Black Mountain Middle School
Thank you for writing this article. You are not the first to write an article on a middle school in this district, but your article is very complete. However, the neutrality of the article is disputed and certain parts remain biased towards members of your school. Please make sure all sections remain unbiased.  Pzoxicuvybtnrm  02:16, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 24 November 2015 (UTC)