User talk:Useight/Archive16

WikiCup Newsletter XXX
Delivered for the WikiCup by  ROBOTIC GARDEN  at 19:38, 12 September 2009 (UTC). To report errors see the talk page.

Admin Coach
I'm not sure if you remember me, but I was your admin coachee about a year ago. We stopped because I retired. I am back editing full time, and I was wondering if you would be willing to continue to coach me. I still have User:LAAFan/Editor coaching, so we would just have to start from that point.--LAA Fan sign review 03:16, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, I don't feel like I'm active enough to be an official coach at the moment. I've been busy working full time, planning a wedding, studying for the GMAT, and looking for a new place to live. Where I used to get 100 edits daily, now I'm only averaging 30. My User:Useight/Status has been set to "Busy" since July 21st. If you're seeking a full time admin coach, I'm going to have to decline. Perhaps take a look at WP:ADMINCOACH. However, if you ever have a question on anything, want me to look into a dispute, or need assistance, my talk page is always open and I'll have a response within 24 hours. I am most active in the evenings (US). Useight (talk) 23:55, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Cabal
Haha, I didn't turn it down! I just thought that it would be weird if I suggested it, but now I'm glad to know that I can participate in such fun. And you're right; this cabal would be unstoppable. You could always conform and turn into "Use of Eight"... Master of Puppets  - Call me MoP! :D  22:09, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

LetItGo
I just discovered your essay when an editor linked to it in a discussion (for the record: that editor was addressing someone else!). It is simple wisdom. Why don't you put it in Wikipedia: space, where it has a better chance of being noticed? Finell (Talk) 23:59, 17 October 2009 (UTC)
 * ✅ I have moved it to Let it go. Useight (talk) 14:12, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Great! I know that I will be citing it. Thanks. Finell (Talk) 02:27, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

sorry to bother.
I see your getting married and is currently very busy. I jsut wanted to drop by and say hi... I was currently retired but I'm back.--The other  shadow   00:57, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, nice to see you around again. I'm still active in the evenings (US) while the fianceé does her homework. I edit for an hour or two a day. But yeah, I've been really busy as of late. What are you up to these days? Useight (talk) 00:59, 20 October 2009 (UTC)

Strange
That we didn't get an edit conflict notice. Perhaps because our edits were the same? –Katerenka ☆ 01:23, 22 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Indeed that was interesting. I'm not sure what happened there. Useight (talk) 01:24, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

WikiCup Awards
Congratulations! Hope to see you sign up for the 2010 WikiCup, here, if you haven't already!  iMatthew  talk   at 23:03, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

married?
That's great to hear... you must be very glad. I'm only 14....--The other  shadow   03:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. I'm getting married at the end of next week. It took me awhile to find the right girl, but I know I've finally found her. Useight (talk) 15:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * All the best, to you and your spouse. Hope the big day went well. AGK 19:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. Indeed everything went well and we're in the process of moving during the next couple of days. Useight (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Thanks
...for cleaning up User:Juliancolton/Bureaucrats! I was hoping someone would take care of that so I can be lazy. :) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 23:08, 18 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Hey, no problem. I got your back. Useight (talk) 23:13, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Re: married?
That's great to hear... you must be very glad. I'm only 14....--The other  shadow   03:09, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yep. I'm getting married at the end of next week. It took me awhile to find the right girl, but I know I've finally found her. Useight (talk) 15:05, 13 November 2009 (UTC)


 * All the best, to you and your spouse. Hope the big day went well. AGK 19:24, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you very much. Indeed everything went well and we're in the process of moving during the next couple of days. Useight (talk) 19:26, 24 November 2009 (UTC)


 * Where did you move?--The other  shadow   03:08, 1 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Just across town. I now live in a two-bedroom apartment with my wife. Useight (talk) 16:22, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Congrats to you. :)  bibliomaniac 1  5  03:20, 1 December 2009 (UTC)

Happy First Edit Day
Vatsan34 (talk) 09:57, 2 December 2009 (UTC)

My guestbook...?
I don't understand, was it supposed to be a joke, or did you actually think my guestbook was an RfA/AfD/etc.? Haha. <font color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles  <font color="003B48" size="2px">24/7  <font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)  01:03, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * That's just how I sign them. Usually. I've been doing that for a long time now. Useight (talk) 01:40, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Haha, okay then. <font color="003B48" size="2px">Eagles  <font color="003B48" size="2px">24/7  <font color="003B48" size="1px">(C)  01:59, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Barnstar

 * Hey, thanks. I've got your back. Useight (talk) 23:24, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

2010 WikiCup Signups Reconfirmation!
To ensure that everyone who signed up is still committed to participating in the 2010 WikiCup, it is required that you remove your name from this list! By removing your name, you are not removing yourself from the WikiCup. This is simply a way for the judges to take note of who has not yet reconfirmed their participation. If you have not removed your name from that list by December 30th, 2009 (by 23:59 (UTC)) then your name will be removed from the WikiCup.

It's worth noting the rules have changed, likely after you signed up. The changes made thus far are:
 * Mainspace and/or portal edits will not be awarded points at all.
 * Did you know? articles (which were worth 5 points last year) will now be worth 10 points.
 * Good articles (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
 * Valued pictures will be now awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.
 * Featured lists (which were worth 30 points last year) will now be worth 40 points.
 * Featured portals (which were worth 25 points last year) will now be worth 35 points.
 * Featured articles (which were worth 50 points last year) will now be worth 100 points.
 * Featured topics (which were worth 10 points per article last year) will now be worth 15 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
 * Good topics (which were worth 5 points per article last year) will now be worth 10 points per any article in the topic that you were a major contributor to.
 * In the news will still be awarded points, however the amount (5 or 10 points) is still being discussed.

If you have any final concerns about the WikiCup's rules and regulations, please ask them now, before the Cup begins to avoid last minute problems. You may come to the WikiCup's talk page, or any of the judge's user talk pages. We're looking forwards to a great 2010 WikiCup! On behalf of the WikiCup judges,  iMatthew  talk   at 03:48, 5 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Haha. I beat this notice by exactly one minute. Useight (talk) 03:49, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Policy Report
The community gave feedback on a couple of policy pages at WT:SOCK and WT:CIVILITY, and there will be another one in Monday's Signpost that we're putting together at WT:Username policy. I'm asking for your participation because you made an edit this month or last month at that talk page. If you have questions, feel free to ask at WT:Username policy or my talk page. The best guide to what the community is expecting from the surveys is to follow the links above to see what they've already done; we haven't had any complaints. Thanks for your time. - Dank (push to talk) 17:02, 10 December 2009 (UTC)

Note: you missed the window for comment
... but your comment is a good one. (I don't work for Signpost, but had the page watchlisted after I posted mine). While I'm here, happy holidays. Proofreader77 (talk) 00:26, 11 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hmm. Oh, well. At least it gave me a little something to think about. And a Merry Christmas to you, too. Useight (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

Mentorship Committee
I'm contacting you because your name is listed at Meetup/Utah.

Please consider reviewing my edit at Wikipedia:Mentorship#Unintended consequences. In the search for a mentor deemed acceptable by ArbCom, I view this as a useful context for discussing what I have in mind.

There is no obvious congruence between your editing interests and mine, but perhaps the disjunction presents a novel opportunity.

Will you consider looking into whether you might agree to join others in a Mentorship Committee which advises me?


 * In any case -- even if you are disinclined to pursue the primary thrust of this diff, I wonder if I might be able to tweak your curiosity with an article about 95-year-old Patrick Lennox Tierney? He is a Japanologist academic in the field of art history, an emeritus professor of the University of Utah, a former Curator of Japanese Art at the Utah Museum of Fine Arts, and a former Commissioner of Art and Monuments during the Allied Occupation of Japan (1945-1952).  I think this elderly man still lives near the University.  Tierney came to my attention because the Japanese government conferred the Order of the Rising Sun, Gold Rays with Neck Ribbon in 2007.


 * Perhaps the most intriguing aspect of Tierney's life concerns his work for the Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers (SCAP), Gen. Douglas MacArthur. Tierney's office was near MacArthur's suite in SCAP headquarters.  Tierney was an eyewitness on the day Emperor Hirohito came to offer a formal apology; but when the emperor arrived, MacArthur refused to admit him or acknowledge him. Issues which might have been addressed were allowed to remain open, with consequences which unfolded across the decades which followed.  In 2006, Tierney made an effort to explain his understanding of what he had personally observed: "Apology is a very important thing in Japan.  With us, we don't apologize unless we get caught with our hand in the cookie jar, but for the Japanese, there is a very strong sense of what an apology means."  According to popular historian Herbert Bix in Hirohito and the Making of Modern Japan, "MacArthur's truly extraordinary measures to save Hirohito from trial as a war criminal had a lasting and profoundly distorting impact on Japanese understanding of the lost war."

Among a prospective mentor's many burdens, the most difficult would involve (a) helping me discern why or when I should apologize or (b) helping me to explain why or when I will not apologize in a wiki-context. --Tenmei (talk) 02:28, 26 December 2009 (UTC)

The 2010 WikiCup begins tomorrow!
Welcome to the biggest WikiCup Wikipedia has yet seen! Round one will take place over two months, and finish on February 26. There is only one pool, and the top 64 will progress. The competition will be tough, as more than half of the current competitors will not make it to round 2. Details about scoring have been finalized and are explained at WikiCup/Scoring. Please make sure you're familiar with the scoring rules, because any submissions made that violate these rules will be removed. Like always, the judges can be reached through the WikiCup talk pages, on their talk page, or over IRC with any issues concerning anything tied to the Cup. We will keep in contact with you via weekly newsletters; if you do not want to receive them, please remove yourself from the list here. Conversely, if a non-WikiCup participant wishes to receive the newsletters, they may add themselves to that list. Well, enough talk- get writing! Your submission's page is located here. Details on how to submit your content is located here, so be sure to check that out! Once content has been recognized, it can be added to your submissions page, from which our bot will update the main score table. Remember that only articles worked on and nominated during the competition are eligible for points. Have fun, and good luck! Garden, iMatthew, J Milburn, and The ed17 19:24, 31 December 2009 (UTC)

Running for adminship
If I were to run for adminship right now, would you support or oppose, and why would you do so? — MC10 ( T • C • GB •[ L ]• EM )  21:46, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Based on my inital overview, I would support. I still need to take a sampling of your contribs, though. I've got a dinner appointment with some of my in-laws here shortly, so I'll take a look into that later this evening. I'll also give you a list of my reasoning then. Useight (talk) 22:27, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Alright, understood. Thanks! — MC10 ( T • C • GB •[ L ]• EM )  23:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Of your last 500 edits, which go back to the tail end of October, about 170 were via Huggle or AWB, something that used to rub me the wrong way, but now I don't mind it too much as long as it's not really excessive. Taking a closer look at your contribs, you have good edit summary usage and do a pretty good job marking minor edits. You don't spend too much time playing around in your userspace. Your communication with others seems cordial enough, with good spelling and grammar. A random sampling of your AFD work looked good. Yeah, I'd support. Useight (talk) 17:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

The SoxBot bug
You're back to 0 again. I had a random thought that maybe the bug is because the Tally page doesn't seem to distinguish between RfB's and RfA's, so maybe it thinks it's supposed to be looking for RfA/Useight 3 instead of RfB/Useight 3, sees that it has closed, and deletes it from its page? Only X! would know for sure. But I think it may be best to switch to manual tallying for this RfB. -- <B>Soap</B> Talk/Contributions 03:39, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I was about to set it up for a manual tally, but you beat me to it. Thanks. And I think you're probably right about that RFA vs. RFB thing, but X! has been hard to get a hold of as of late. Useight (talk) 03:48, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

could you check this for me?
I need a experienced person to double check something i recently added to an article.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/We_Are_the_World#25th_Anniversary_Re-Recording

I'm pretty sure I covered my butt on this, but I just want to make sure I got reliable sources and all that. I'm not sure if you remember me or any of the battles in the past, but I usually had to go through hell to please one or more fellow editors.

So anyways could you check this out and point out anything I might have to fix. I got three different sources and I think I coded the links right. Its been a while since I had anything to add so I might be rusty. Yami (talk) 22:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Of course I remember you and some past incidents. But, yeah, those sources look good to me. I think you're fine. Useight (talk) 22:36, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

You are now a bureaucrat
Congratulations, I have just closed your RfB as successful and made you a bureaucrat. Don't hesitate to ask me if you ever have any questions. Good luck! <strong style="font-variant:small-caps">WJBscribe (talk) 18:04, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Congrats! Please update your information here. ··· 日本穣 ? · 投稿  · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:05, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * <tt>User talk:Useight [user,bureaucrat,sysop]</tt> - Guess that means you won! Congrats. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 18:07, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Hooray, you did it! Great job! ( X! ·  talk )  · @800  · 18:12, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Congrats and welcome aboard! An email address with a common domain, and a username consisting of 3 English words, has applied to join the 'crat list.  Is that you?  -- Pakaran 18:16, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yep, that's me. And thanks, everyone, for your comments. Useight (talk) 18:19, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Should be on the list now. -- Pakaran 18:20, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Congrats. <font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">Sy <font color="#222222" face="Times New Roman">n 18:18, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


 * I see you've done your first rename already. :D I'm really glad you passed: I was pleased to support every single one of your RfAs and RfBs, and am happy to see this RfB of yours pass. Good luck! Acalamari 18:27, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, hopefully I've done it correctly. And a heartfelt thanks for your continued support over the years. Useight (talk) 18:30, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I was beginning to think there was something wrong with RfB, until you and Joe came along and proved me wrong. And I'm very happy to be wrong.  Welcome to the shovel. - Dank (push to talk) 23:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

What sums you up
So you are a "page [that] may meet Wikipedia’s criteria for speedy deletion as an article about a real person that does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject." ? Simply south (talk) 18:29, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha, yeah. No, actually I was going for the "a real person that does not credibly indicate [his] importance or significance" portion. Useight (talk) 18:33, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:RFB
Hi, you asked me about my oppose vote for your RFB. The upper levels of bureaucracy at Wikipedia have always seemed to be more of a circle jerk than an actual improvement in the construction of an encyclopedia to me, so when you came back and had changed the views that caused the vote to fail your last time, to me it reeked of the internet equivalent of dumbing yourself down to sit with the cool kids at lunch. However, part of my vote was also curiosity at what your response to be, and yours seems to indicate that you did it for better reasons than to just push your vote through, so had it not already closed I would have changed to a support. Sorry for bothering you, and congratulations on 'cratship.Zengar Zombolt (talk) 21:26, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. With that in mind, I'm going to go ahead and consider the RFB to be unanimous. Useight (talk) 23:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Congratulations!
Congratulations on becoming a bureaucrat! mynameinc (t|c) 01:40, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Just saw your close of the Bwilkins RfA...was that your first crat action? Congratulations! <b class="IPA">r<font color="#8B0000">ʨ anaɢ</b> talk/contribs 23:12, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Nope, I've also done 17 renames. But that was the first time used the +sysop. Useight (talk) 23:36, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * You've come a long way. :) Glad to see another great user helping out.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:05, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

Usurpations
Hi; thanks for diving into WP:CHUU, your work is MUCH appreciated. May I please make one request, though? When you finish one, please change the tag on top to. As CHUU's can last for weeks, we kept the status indicator in for ease in identifying which ones need attention. Thanks, and Welcome aboard!! -- Avi (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Gotcha, I'll do that. Thanks for the tip. Useight (talk) 20:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 January newsletter
We are half way through round one of the WikiCup. We've had some shakeups regarding late entries, flag changes and early dropouts, but the competition is now established- there will be no more flag changes or new competitors. Congratulations to, our current leader, who, at the time of writing, has more listed points than and   (second and third place respectively) combined. A special well done also goes to - his artcle Jewel Box (St. Louis, Missouri) was the first content to score points in the competition.

Around half of competitors are yet to score. Please remember to submit content soon after it is promoted, so that the judges are able to review entries. 64 of the 149 current competitors will advance to round 2- if you currently have no points, do not worry, as over half of the current top 64 have under 50 points. Everyone needs to get their entries in now to guarantee their places in round 2! If you are concerned that your nomination will not receive the necessary reviews, and you hope to get it promoted before the end of the round, please list it on WikiCup/Reviews. However, please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! J Milburn, Garden, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Username change
Hey - I had a question about a username change request that you recently approved. The same user existed in the past as Rhp_26 - this time around he asked to be renamed to Rhp26 (no underscore). As I explained here,:
 * Should this renaming even be allowed? Let alone the users’ continued editing privileges (under any name)? User Abraxas Wardak first denied the sock by filing an ANI. Then, shortly thereafter, admitted it by requesting a name change.
 * As explained, Rhp_26 = Druid.raul = Marcosino Pedros Sancheza = Abraxas Wardak. This is all proven now. Besides, the first three accounts were indefinitely blocked for a host of reasons, including gross incivility, racism, verbal abuse and so forth.
 * The block logs are here:
 * Rhp_26
 * Druid.raul
 * Marcosino Pedros Sancheza
 * And the Sock Investigation (complete with checkuser results) is here.
 * Thanks, Jasepl (talk) 05:01, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, your question isn't explicitly clear, but it sounds like you're asking whether the rename should have gone through. In hindsight, I would not have performed the rename had I had that information. You'll note that I performed the rename at 23:17 Feb 5, and the associated clerk note didn't arrive until 00:11 Feb 6. His talkpage didn't have any notes regarding the matter until 00:09 Feb 6. When I perform a rename I verify that the user made the request, check their talk page, ensure they've made more than just a few edits, check SUL to make sure the name's available, and ensure they're not blocked. Everything there looked good at the time of the rename. I do not follow ANI, so I never know what's going on there. There's usually far more going on there than I'd care to get involved in, anyway. I also do not follow sockpuppetry cases. So, if you're asking if that rename should have gone through under the now-known circumstances, I'd say no. If you're asking me to reverse the rename, I can do that. Useight (talk) 16:37, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Oh no worries - I guess I should have explained better. Anyway, turns out other people got involved as well, and the user is now indefinitely blocked. Thanks! Jasepl (talk) 17:16, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

RFA Withdrawn
I'd just like to drop a note that I've withdrawn my RfA, so it can be closed accordingly. Thanks. Connormah (talk | contribs) 00:16, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I have taken care of it. Sorry it didn't work out for you; perhaps you'll have better luck in the future. Keep up the good work. Useight (talk) 00:29, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No worries. Thanks. I may run again in perhaps late April, or whenever I feel that I've addressed the raised concerns in the opposition, but I'm not entirely sure. Thanks again. Connormah (talk | contribs) 00:39, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

 * Sweet. And you're most welcome. I'm only here to help. Useight (talk) 22:50, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

please change my username
dude, please check out my request for changing my username, at Changing username --Ramy.Abbady (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I don't see a request there. If you'll tell me what username you want, I can change it for you. Useight (talk) 17:27, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Deleting your user talk page
I'm really sorry for deleting your user talk page! I was deleting a page in another user's userspace, brought up your talk page, and went to look at something else; when I got back, I hit delete and only then realised that I wasn't on the other user's page. Nyttend (talk) 03:43, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, don't sweat it. I was about to head to your talk page to make a funny comment or something. I saw the "new message" but didn't have one, and I was all "what's going on here?" Anyway, no problem though. Have a good one. Useight (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reassurance. At least I'd restored the talk page by the time you got the message; it would have been bad if you'd found that you didn't have a talk page to go to :-)  Nyttend (talk) 03:48, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That would've been quite funny, actually. I just missed it by a few moments. If only I hadn't spent so long brushing my teeth. Useight (talk) 03:50, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Username Change
Hi, could you please change my username (on ). Thanks. Epaulard (talk) 22:08, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
 * ✅. Useight (talk) 22:57, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Usurping
I've seen in the user rename log that usurpation occasionally happens when there's a small number of edits from awhile back, but is there an absolute rule or is it a judgment call? I've been eying an account with only six edits from two years ago. . . --otherlleft 03:35, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No, there's no absolute rule on usurpations, just a judgement call on a case-by-case basis. Six edits from two years ago, may still be too many/recent for usurpation. It's a close call, though. I'd have to know what the edits were. If they were in the userspace, vandalism that got reverted, sandbox, etc, you're probably good, but if they were six edits adding substantial content and sources, you're probably out of luck. If you let me know the account, I can take a look and let you know what I think. Useight (talk) 20:11, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Rename
Just wanted to say thanks for renaming my account. :) Cloudbound (formerly Wikiwoohoo) (talk) 22:09, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. That's what I'm here for. Useight (talk) 23:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 February newsletter
Round one is over, and round two has begun! Congratulations to the 64 contestants who have made it through, but well done and thank you to all contestants who took part in our first round. A special well done goes to, our round one winner (1010 points), and to and , who were second and third respectively (640 points/605 points). Sasata was awarded the most points for both good articles (300 points) and featured articles (600 points), and TonyTheTiger was awarded the most for featured topics (225 points), while Hunter Kahn claimed the most for good topics (70). claimed the most featured lists (240 points) and featured pictures (35 points), claimed the most for Did you know? entries (490 points),  claimed the most for featured sounds (70 points) and  claimed the most for In the news entries (40 points). No one claimed a featured portal or valued picture.

Credits awarded after the end of round one but before round two may be claimed in round two, but remember the rule that content must have been worked on in some significant way during 2010 by you for you to claim points. The groups for round two will be placed up shortly, and the submissions' pages will be blanked. This round will continue until 28 April, when the top two users from each group, as well as 16 wildcards, will progress to round three. Please remember to continue to offer reviews at GAC, FAC and all the other pages that require them to prevent any backlogs which could otherwise be caused by the Cup; thank you to all doing this last round, and particularly to those helping at WikiCup/Reviews. As ever, questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges are reachable on their talk pages, by email or on IRC. Good luck! If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) at 00:56, 1 March 2010 (UTC)

Nice work
Thanks for taking on the historical rework at Successful_requests_for_adminship. I have always intended to get to it eventually, but...somehow something has always come up. Frank |  talk  18:17, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks for noticing. It's been a tedious job, so I guess that's why nobody got to it. But it's almost done. I didn't think it would hardly be noticed (how often do people look at that old stuff?), but thanks for noticing. Have a good one, Frank. Useight (talk) 19:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Well, I created the rfarow template and went back through 2008 and 2009 to convert to that format. The reason I didn't go further back is because the earlier years were even more tedious; there was less of a structure to how things were done and I just figured I'd get to it eventually...or someone would. When you did...it was worth noticing! Now if I can just figure a way to run the unsuccessful (alphabetical) pages through that template... Frank  |  talk  00:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * There have been a lot of unsuccessful RFAs over the years. I don't know if I'm going to get to those. It's pretty tedious. But I suppose both number 7 and 8 of my objectives are tedious. But someone's got to do it. Useight (talk) 00:48, 8 March 2010 (UTC)


 * For these "historical" RFAs you're creating, could you add Category:Successful requests for adminship to them? This way the RFA finder javascript works. Thanks and keep up the good work, –<b style="font-family:verdana; color:black;">xeno</b><sup style="color:black;">talk 22:04, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Good point. Yeah, I'll do that. Thanks for the heads up. Useight (talk) 22:06, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Don't forget to sort them! ( now, just for future reference.) – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 19:32, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Noob

 * Yeah, I edit conflicted with you finishing that up. I've been using a Linux-based laptop for the past couple of weeks and it's incredibly slow. I received my new video card via UPS about an hour ago. So I'm going to put that in and dump this laptop forever. I've had about seven edit conflicts today. Thanks, though, for getting to that. Useight (talk) 22:40, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No probs. You and your fancy Linux gear :) - why you can't stick with the high quality offering from Bill Gates I don't know .... oh... yeah ... okay :) Heh. Pedro : Chat  22:42, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

First close as a crat Useight? Do anything special for your christening? <font color="#660000">Wisdom89  ( <font color="#17001E">T |undefined /  <font color="#17001E">C ) 23:36, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll have to find something to commemorate the occasion. Useight (talk) 23:38, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Dallas Texans seasons
Template:Dallas Texans seasons has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. <font face="Comic Sans MS"> Gman 124 talk 14:32, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

also others
Also nominate following for deletion: Template:Chicago Tigers seasons, Template:New York Brickley Giants seasons, Template:Cincinnati Celts seasons, Template:Tonawanda Kardex seasons, Template:Washington Senators seasons, Template:St. Louis All-Stars seasons,Template:Kenosha Maroons seasons, Template:Brooklyn Lions seasons, Template:Hartford Blues seasons, Template:Los Angeles Buccaneers seasons, Template:Cleveland Indians (NFL) seasons, Template:St. Louis Gunners seasons.

see Templates_for_discussion. <font face="Comic Sans MS"> Gman 124 talk 14:50, 10 March 2010 (UTC)

Sly Cooper
I see that Sly Cooper (series) got moved to Sly Cooper, but I have a few questions and concerns.
 * First, where did the character's page content go? It is not in the history of Sly Cooper, and it doesn't appear to be in Sly Cooper (character), so where did this content go?
 * Second, the talkpage for the series was deleted, but was there any content in it to be moved to Talk:Sly Cooper?

Thanks, <sub style="color:#00008B;">Blake (Talk·Edits) 18:32, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hmm, let me take a look. Useight (talk) 20:58, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Answering the second question first, the now-deleted talkpage consisted of two comments from bots regarding images, one "suggestion" to the creators of the series, and one "I love sly cooper!!!!!!" posted by an IP address. All from 2007 with the exception of the IP's comment. Useight (talk) 21:06, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * To answer the first question, I'll have to dig around in the deleted history of Sly Cooper. Sly Cooper (character) is now a redirect, so there's nothing there. I'll look into it in a few hours. Useight (talk) 21:12, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Admin Coaching: Reconfirmation
I was looking through the coaches at Admin_coaching/Status and saw that your entry was commented out. I have moved it to the "Reconfirmation" section.

Could you let me know if you are still interesting in being involved with Admin Coaching, or if you would prefer to have your name removed from the "reconfirmation" list and placed on the "retired" list. If you want to be involved, could you please move your entry from "Reconfirmation" to "Active" and indicate how many students you would be willing to have (obviously, if you are actively coaching at the moment, then please indicate this!)

If I do not hear from you within a week, I will assume that you would like to have your name removed from the list of coaches and moved to the retired list.

Regards, -- <font color="#307D7E">Phantom <font color="#55CAFA">Steve /<font color="#008000">talk &#124;<font color="#000080">contribs \ 07:48, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I moved myself out of the reconfirmation table. Thanks for the heads up. Useight (talk) 20:35, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Name change quandry
Would you mind taking a look at this. since you were the admin who did the name change? I can't figure out what went on, whether it was some sort of glitch in the name change, or whether the editor did something untoward. Beyond My Ken (talk) 05:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Responded at the thread you linked. Useight (talk) 19:14, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Psychedelic Blue Background On User Page
Your user page hurts my eyes! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.187.80.2 (talk) 20:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll see about making it a lighter shade of blue. Useight (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

About User name change of Amitzorba
Hi Please make it Varanwal. Thanks! Amitzorba —Preceding undated comment added 02:49, 31 March 2010 (UTC).
 * ✅. Useight (talk) 19:56, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

WikiCup 2010 March newsletter
We're half way through round two, and everything is running smoothly. leads overall with 650 points this round, and heads pool B. currently leads pool C, dubbed the "Group of Death", which has a only a single contestant yet to score this round (the fewest of any group), as well five contestants over 100 points (the most). With a month still to go, as well as 16 wildcard places, everything is still to play for. Anything you worry may not receive the necessary attention before the end of the round (such as outstanding GA or FA nominations) is welcome at WikiCup/Reviews, and please remember to continue offering reviews yourself where possible. As always, the judges are available to contact via email, IRC or their talk pages, and general discussion about the Cup is welcome on the WikiCup talk page.

Although unrelated to the WikiCup, April sees a Good Article Nominations backlog elimination drive, formulated as a friendly competition with small awards, as the Cup is. Several WikiCup contestants and judges have already signed up, but regular reviewers and those who hope to do more reviewing are more than welcome to join at the drive page. If you wish to start receiving or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn, Fox, iMatthew and The ed17 Delivered by JCbot (talk) 22:24, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Delete account
Can you delete or rename account Crusier because it prevent to create my global account. (Sorry for my English) --Crusier from pl.wikipedia 87.205.165.100 (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Way late Congrats!
I just now found out that you're now a bureaucrat (I'm a little behind). Congrats! Jauerbackdude?/dude. 13:48, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Hey, thanks. Good to see you're still around. Useight (talk) 22:40, 15 April 2010 (UTC)