User talk:User1481

August 2013
Hello, I'm MrX. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Christian Coalition of America without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! - MrX 22:00, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Christian Coalition of America, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. - MrX 17:02, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Do not use multiple IP addresses to vandalize Wikipedia, like you did at Christian Coalition of America. Such attempts to avoid detection, or circumvent the blocking policy will not succeed. You are welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia but your recent edits have been reverted or removed. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please do not use Special:Contributions/99.95.202.174 to make the same changes as this account, in an effort to work around the three-revert rule. Binksternet (talk) 22:19, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Christian Coalition of America shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Binksternet (talk) 00:10, 17 August 2013 (UTC)