User talk:User178198273998166172

March 2017
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to White Friday (1916)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   21:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)

Infoboxes
The purpose of an infobox is to give a quick and somewhat graphic overview of salient facts from the article. A list of dozens of "commanders" is not useful there. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 02:36, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Alexander Mozhaev for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alexander Mozhaev is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Alexander Mozhaev until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System ( talk ) 22:10, 30 June 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Jerzy Pilat
Hello, User178198273998166172. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Jerzy Pilat, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 19:28, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Dariusz Maciag
Hello, User178198273998166172. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Dariusz Maciag, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) edit the page
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

 Onel 5969  TT me 19:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Afro-Norwegian) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Afro-Norwegian, User178198273998166172!

Wikipedia editor Megalibrarygirl just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

""

To reply, leave a comment on Megalibrarygirl's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Megalibrarygirl (talk) 02:34, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Black Monday (1360), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Killed ([//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Black_Monday_%281360%29 check to confirm] | [//toolserver.org/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Black_Monday_%281360%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)

A page you started (Guy de Beauchamp II) has been reviewed!
Thanks for creating Guy de Beauchamp II, User178198273998166172!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

"This has been tagged for one issue."

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 17:11, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jacques de Châtillon de Dampière
Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Jacques de Châtillon de Dampière!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for several issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 17:12, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Jean V de Hangest
Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Jean V de Hangest!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. At the moment, this has no reliable sources and thus the notability isn't clear enough. Are you able to add to it? Thanks for taking the time to start this article.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 07:47, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Włodzimierz of Cracow
Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Włodzimierz of Cracow!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged as needing additional references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 08:00, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Flags in Infoboxes
Please see WP:INFOBOXFLAG:

"Generally, flag icons should not be used in infoboxes, even when there is a "country", "nationality" or equivalent field: they are unnecessarily distracting and give undue prominence to one field among many."

-  General Ization  Talk   02:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Ways to improve Ioan Glogojeanu
Hi, I'm Boleyn. User178198273998166172, thanks for creating Ioan Glogojeanu!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please add clear references.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 20:04, 1 September 2018 (UTC)

Copyright problem on Battle of Paderborn (1945)
Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from http://www.militaryhallofhonor.com/honoree-record.php?id=3022 or elsewhere online. Copying text directly from a source is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policy. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Content you add to Wikipedia should be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:35, 15 December 2018 (UTC)

Required notice relating to Syrian Civil War related pages

 * Clear 1RR violation: of  and  of . The latter revert comes after . — MarkH21 (talk) 03:41, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I hadn't noticed that the second edit had been a revert when I looked at it earlier. ST47 (talk) 04:00, 11 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Actually, I'm not going to count as a revert, as it does introduce a source, whereas the removal of the term "invasion" at  was because it was unsourced. Even if a block is technically permitted under the sanctions, in this case  did actually attempt to work towards addressing other editors' concerns, and I'm not inclined to punish that. , on the other hand, is outright WP:TEND/WP:BATTLEGROUND behavior, which I hope User178198273998166172 will not repeat. ST47 (talk) 04:07, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Taunting other users
Please have a look at WP:GRAVEDANCING before making comments like this edit again. It's not a very good look. Thanks, ST47 (talk) 22:28, 10 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of 2019 Ménaka helicopter crash


The article 2019 Ménaka helicopter crash has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Military aircraft accidents are rarely of note and although sad occurence it is not noteworthy for a stand alone article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MilborneOne (talk) 22:36, 30 November 2019 (UTC)

Nomination of 2020 New Taipei helicopter crash for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2020 New Taipei helicopter crash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/2020 New Taipei helicopter crash until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  Sandstein  10:30, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

March 2020
Please be careful about what you say to people. Some remarks, such as your addition to User talk:RobertPaulsonn can easily be misinterpreted, or viewed as harassment. Wikipedia is a supportive environment, where contributors should feel comfortable and safe while editing. (WP:GRAVEDANCING is not appropriate, regardless of the circumstances.) Steel1943  (talk) 18:39, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

Re: Afro-Polish
The total population is stated as " Between 4,000 - 5,000 ", but the source does not exist and archives of it at web.archive.org don't exist either. Please suggest another source if possible? --Gryllida (talk) 08:20, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at 2020 Nagorno-Karabakh conflict. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted. Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2020 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Armenia/Azerbaijan discretionary sanctions
Cabayi (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

File copyright problem with File:Russian soldiers Sheykhalan 1915.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Russian soldiers Sheykhalan 1915.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is [ a list of your uploads].

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. (t · c)  buidhe  22:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Babak Samidli


A tag has been placed on Babak Samidli requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the.  DGG ( talk ) 07:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Beshogur (talk) 23:12, 3 December 2020 (UTC)

Nomination of Ferdinand Belmont for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ferdinand Belmont is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Ferdinand Belmont until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lettlerhello • contribs 13:53, 5 August 2021 (UTC)