User talk:User2001

Welcome!
Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you recently removed some content without thoroughly explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 09:31, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Your changes to the Jook-sing article
I have reverted your most recent changes to the Jook-sing article.

They removed important content, such as the initial definition, and you gave no reasons for your changes.

Please use an Edit summary to explain each change you make, but more importantly, when you plan to make such significant changes, you should first discuss them on the article's talk page.

Please don't make any more changes to the article until you're prepared to do at least one or preferably both the above things. HiLo48 (talk) 17:16, 25 December 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Jook-sing
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Greenmaven (talk) 03:12, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits to Jook-sing
Hello, and thank you for your recent contributions. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit(s) because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! Acabashi (talk) 04:21, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

December 2013
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Jook-sing. Your edits have been reverted or removed. Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Greenmaven (talk) 04:42, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

ANI Discussion
A discussion has been opened at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your editing of the Jook-sing article. HiLo48 (talk) 05:23, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 13:36, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

January 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 Hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Spartaz Humbug! 09:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
 * You need to start communicating with other editors and discussing your edits if they are opposed. Spartaz Humbug! 10:00, 3 January 2014 (UTC)