User talk:User3.14

June 2014
Hello, I'm Lucas Thoms. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person, Frankie Jonas, but that you didn’t support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. &mdash;Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 04:10, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Frankie Jonas. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Frankie Jonas was changed by User3.14 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.954738 on 2014-06-18T04:31:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:31, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to 2006 NFL Draft with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. BollyJeff &#124;  talk  01:19, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Frankie Jonas. &mdash;Lucas Thoms, formerly My Ubuntu (talk) 01:30, 19 June 2014 (UTC) You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Materialscientist (talk) 00:42, 20 June 2014 (UTC)