User talk:User3204

September 2019
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Changhe Freedom M70; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. – Dave | Davey 2010 Talk 13:59, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
 * So could you explain why were you undoing my edits? What’s wrong with the image? —User3204 (talk) 14:16, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * There's nothing wrong with your image however there's nothing wrong with the other image either, Images should be better than what they're replacing however in this case there's no difference between the 2, You're more than welcome to go to the talkpage and seek consensus for your changes, Thanks, – Dave | Davey 2010 Talk 14:21, 13 September 2019 (UTC)
 * Oic, thanks for your remind. —User3204 (talk) 14:40, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2020
Please stop removing good-quality images and replacing them with lower-quality ones. Note the project image guidelines, which, I will reiterate, includes the statement "Vehicle production date is not a factor when determining the quality of an image and its suitability to illustrate the lead infobox." Images with distracting backgrounds, glare, and/or reflections are generally poor choices, and photos taken indoors at an auto show usually have those problems, as with the one you inserted. --Sable232 (talk) 17:21, 19 September 2020 (UTC)

You are the one who moving good quality images. The last image I added is a quality image with higher pixels than the original one. -User3204 (talk) 02:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

The last image is good quality but, the current image is the best example of a work on Commons. The last one appears to have a crowd of people walking in the background and that tends to be distracting. Here are the exact words that the image guidelines say, “ The image selected for an article's top (lead) infobox does not need to show any particular version or generation of the vehicle, such as the latest, the last, the first, the best-selling, or any other. However, the image must be representative; low-volume, obscure/unusual, or otherwise unrepresentative variants are generally not preferred for the lead infobox image. Vehicle production date is not a factor when determining the quality of an image and its suitability to illustrate the lead infobox. Regardless of the ages of the vehicle shown, pick a clear, high-quality image according to the image quality guidelines; one that clearly shows a vehicle relevant to the article without photoflash glare or other photographic faults, against a simple and contrasting background. Such an image is always to be preferred over a lower-quality image, such as one that shows photoflash glare or a distracting background.” Thanks! Ee2mba (talk) 04:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)


 * User3204, pixel count is largely irrelevant - an image is not better simply because it's larger in size. One that's nearly 2000px in width is plenty large to illustrate a vehicle for Wikipedia's purposes. --Sable232 (talk) 21:23, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Toyota Corolla (E120)
I reverted that edit because it was made by a long-term disruptive user evading a block. You are correct, however - those images are far superior. (His image changes usually aren't productive.) --Sable232 (talk) 14:54, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 28 November 2023 (UTC)