User talk:User4edits/Archives/

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koushal Kishor Mishra (December 3)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nomadicghumakkad was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Koushal Kishor Mishra and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Koushal Kishor Mishra, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "Db-g7" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
 * If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Koushal_Kishor_Mishra Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Nomadicghumakkad&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Koushal_Kishor_Mishra reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 23:35, 3 December 2021 (UTC)

BHU VC
The new VC has not taken charge yet. He visited university, went to temple, but didn't take charge. Rector Shukla is still in charge. The reference you gave, it too didn't say anything about taking charge. Also, Rector Shukla's name has been linked to the wiki page of a politician. If you'll please correct this. Seomelono (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ ✅ by yourself only. Thanks for that :). Please also see: this section of BHU and if possible, please expand it. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 04:38, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry, I waited, but then I got some free time and edited it myself. Will definitely try to expand the section you marked. Seomelono (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Relation to BHU
I hope you don't mind, but with the amount of promotional material you are introducing to this article and it being only the only article you are editing, one must ask, are you related to the university in any way? --Muhandes (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * One must reply, and ask to what does one owe an explanation? One must also ask what exactly is being attributed as 'promotional material', and if that is cleared it would easy for one to answer. One doesn't mind at all, since one assumes good faith, and expects all to. While one welcomes positive scrutiny and constructive criticism, one is reminded to remind of Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers Regards, User4edits (talk) 05:28, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I apologize if I sounded harsh and condensending, let me try again. You are here for four years and seem to know your way around so I thought there is no need to treat you like a newcomer. Instead of slapping a COI and a Third-party on the page and a Uw-coi warning on your talk page, I am pointing you attention to the fact that if you have a relationship with BHU you are required to disclose it, even if it is not paid contribution. I always assume good faith, which is why I am asking politely instead of going directly to WP:ANI. No matter if you have such a relation or not, I will continue to assume good faith on your part. As for the material itself, perhaps "promotion" is a strong word, but since this is en encyclopedia and not a brochure, we are much less interested in primarily sourced material, and most of you edits (e.g., here and here but frankly all of it) is primarily sourced. I removed some material which was stricly against policy or consensus, but I am not really interested in editing this page extensively so I will leave that to you. Happy editing. Muhandes (talk) 09:19, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clearing. I'd have loved to answer about 4 years part, being active and inactive, but let's save that for my UserPage's History section, I'll ping you when I update that. Indeed, I am from Varanasi; and aim to only edit about subjects I know. BHU has a special print on modern India's history, and its independence; it has a rich legacy, which includes being probably the only university in India of such scale which was actually crowdfunded from beggars to rulers. It is in light of these and other facts that I keep working on this article in order to improve to, to upscale it on ranking parameters of Wikipedia. I have seen your retractions, and while I welcome them on policy grounds I don't want you to leave this editing article and look forward to working with you to improve one article, with consensus and WP policy insights. Regards, User4edits (talk) 13:54, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
 * Being from Varanasi is not a source of conflict of interest, as long as you are not a student or an employee. Good luck improving the article, but please try to avoid primary sources. --Muhandes (talk) 08:26, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

BHU
Please make a Move request at Talk:BHU. Please follow the steps in this link. When you are done, you can post a template on the Wikipedia talk:Noticeboard for India-related topics. Venkat TL (talk) 17:08, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ You may want to discuss the same there. Regards, User4edits (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2021 (UTC)
 * I have commented. Please remove your duplicate post from India noticeboard. Since you added a please see note, I think it is no longer needed there. Venkat TL (talk) 08:27, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
 * ✅ User4edits (talk) 11:46, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Links to draft articles
Please do not introduce links in actual articles to draft articles, as you did to Banaras Hindu University. Since a draft is not yet ready for the main article space, it is not in shape for ordinary readers, and links from articles should not go to a draft. Such links are contrary to the Manual of Style. Thank you. - Arjayay (talk) 11:55, 23 December 2021 (UTC)
 * oops! Thanks for letting me know. Regards, User4edits (talk) 12:20, 23 December 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Koushal Kishor Mishra has been accepted
 Koushal Kishor Mishra, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_talk/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Koushal_Kishor_Mishra help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks,

Misuse of minor edits checkbox
Hi User4edits! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor&#32;at Varanasi‎ that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. -- Toddy1 (talk) 13:35, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oops! Noted. Thanks for stopping by to let me know, Regards, User4edits (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

Disruptive Editors

 * You are engaged in disruptive editing of this article, despite my repeated warning and requests on your talk page. I am putting this here for the kind notice of other editors. Thank you,User4edits (talk) 08:09, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

User4edits (talk) Thanks for your concern. I did not do any disruptive editing. Kindly open the university page https://www.cuchd.in/about/governance.php shows that Dr. N. T. Rao is the Current Vice Chancellor of Chandigarh University. Dr. H.B. Raghavendra was the Vice-chancellor earlier than him. It is an up-to-date information.
 * Thank you for accepting that LinkedIn is not a reliable source. The website has just been updated with Dr. N.T. Rao, few hours ago it was Dr. H.B. Raghavendra, and it is NT Rao now, therefore, you can make your edit to NT Rao citing reliable sources. Please read this. However, since you were earlier citing LinkedIn relentlessly, I called your disruptive editing. Please do not put the same message on different talk pages. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 10:23, 10 January 2022 (UTC)


 * In that case, I mentioned You engaging in disruptive editing of this article, despite my repeated confirmation about correct information on your talk page, you are adding again false information. I am putting this here for the kind notice of other editors. Thank you,Navyison (talk) 08:20, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Replied on Article talk page User4edits (talk) 10:26, 10 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Banaras Hindu University Kulgeet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Banaras Hindu University Kulgeet
My only wish with this article is to remove invisible characters in cite titles, which produce an error. Cite 3 produces the error message (placing the article in Category:CS1 errors: invisible characters):
 * 1)  no-break space character in   at position 36 (help)  - Oculi (talk) 20:29, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Please continue if you must, I thought you were not aware with Devanagari script. But it seems it is the only page with Devanagari to fall in the CS1 errors, therefore, you may please continue. Regards, User4edits (talk) 20:53, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited A C Joshi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administrator.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Reliable source
Please see WP:PSTS, WP:TOI and WP:OVERCITE Venkat TL (talk) 13:27, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Noted. Aware of WP:TOI, Citing only for non-controversial. Thank you. User4edits (talk) 18:45, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
 * @User4edits I commented because I saw that you were adding 3-4 cites for a sentence. In such cases, prefer to include the best 1 or 2. Preferably most reliable, and avoid Godi Media sources. Venkat TL (talk) 18:57, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Osnat Elkabir, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Israeli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
 * User4edits (talk) 06:21, 22 February 2022 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Aamir Hussain.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Aamir Hussain.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the file description page and add the text  below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing   with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
 * 2) On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅User4edits (talk) 03:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, User4edits

Thank you for creating Arindam Bagchi.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:16, 8 June 2022 (UTC)


 * Thanks,

Thanks! I learned something new today! North8000 (talk) 13:52, 9 June 2022 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, User4edits

Thank you for creating Official Spokesperson of the Ministry of External Affairs.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with. Please remember to sign your reply with ~.

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 01:06, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banaras Hindu University
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Banaras Hindu University you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 02:20, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Banaras Hindu University
The article Banaras Hindu University you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Banaras Hindu University for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of AirshipJungleman29 -- AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 03:01, 22 June 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of National Geographical Journal of India


The article National Geographical Journal of India has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases. A Google search gives 73 hits, most of them issues of ths joornal in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 21:47, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University


The article Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases. A Google search gives 62 hits, most of them issues of ths joornal in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 22:01, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Banaras Law Journal


The article Banaras Law Journal has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases. A Google search gives 113 hits, most of them issues of ths joornal in Google Books, but no in-depth independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 22:19, 19 July 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Banaras Law Journal for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banaras Law Journal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Banaras Law Journal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Randykitty (talk) 20:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Journal of Scientific Research of the Banaras Hindu University until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Randykitty (talk) 20:12, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of National Geographical Journal of India for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article National Geographical Journal of India is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/National Geographical Journal of India until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Randykitty (talk) 20:18, 9 August 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH of The Banaras Hindu University Cover.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:JOURNAL OF SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH of The Banaras Hindu University Cover.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:11, 1 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Banaras Hindu University Map
Template:Banaras Hindu University Map has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 18:14, 4 September 2022 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Academic dress, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page University Grants Commission.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * ✅ User4edits (talk) 11:05, 10 September 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also: Anarchyte ( talk ) 13:03, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted
Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:  Arbitrarily0  ( talk ) 14:11, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Reviewing pending changes, the guideline on reviewing
 * Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
 * Protection policy, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators.


 * @Arbitrarily0 It's concerning that the user's first two reverts after receiving this perm were wrong and incorrectly labelled as vandalism reverts. -- ferret (talk) 14:14, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
 * @Ferret Oops! I am not sure how it happened. As far as I can remember, I saw the preceding version on the right and pending version on the left. Nonetheless, Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I shall do the edits required, and would not like to be judged on just two errs of a one month's history of perm. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 07:33, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * It's concerning that you used the right less than a dozen times in that trial, to be honest. I have not reviewed them, but go read Vandalism again. Neither of those edits were vandalism. One was a sourced edit, that the creeper was originally meant to be a pig. The other I'm not an expert on the subject matter, but by all appearances it was not blatant bad faith vandalism. This is an important distinction. There are many reasons to revert something that ISN'T vandalism, and labelling such as vandalism is disruptive on it's own. Make sure you give a proper reason. -- ferret (talk) 17:07, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
 * I am concerned about the point has brought up. Let's go back to another month trial.   Arbitrarily0   ( talk ) 12:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Banaras Hindu University festivals for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Banaras Hindu University festivals is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Banaras Hindu University festivals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Soni (talk) 12:24, 31 March 2023 (UTC)

CS1 error on Chandigarh University
Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Chandigarh University, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows: Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Qwerfjkl_(bot)&section=new report it to my operator]. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 13:20, 29 May 2023 (UTC)
 * A "missing periodical" error. References show this error when the name of the magazine or journal is not given. Please edit the article to add the name of the magazine/journal to the reference, or use a different citation template. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Chandigarh_University&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit&section=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1157563572%7CChandigarh%20University%5D%5D Ask for help])

Disambiguation link notification for May 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Chandigarh University, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page IET.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:50, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Banaras Hindu University Hostels
Template:Banaras Hindu University Hostels has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 13 June 2023 (UTC)

All caps
Hi @User4edits, I hope it was a mistake but please do not use all caps in edit summaries as you did on Lovely Professional University. Happy editing <3 Jeraxmoira (talk) 05:01, 26 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the heads up! Sorry! Noted with thanks again, User4edits (talk) 05:02, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

pirates of high seas
hey i also wrote my concerns regarding on admin noticeboard. do i also have to notify him? `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨( C • Talk ) 11:32, 29 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi, Have you created under a separate heading? Thanks, User4edits (talk) 11:36, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * no my edit was showing under your heading because i forgot to do that `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨( C • Talk ) 11:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Its fine once you have added the comment, you don't need to separately notify them. Regards, User4edits (talk) 11:44, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks `~ᴀɴᴋʀᴀᴊ ɢɪʀɪ🎇✨( C • Talk ) 11:52, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Vice Chancellors from Banaras Hindu University has been nominated for deletion
Category:Vice Chancellors from Banaras Hindu University has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  03:59, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Randhir Jaiswal moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Randhir Jaiswal, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Maliner (talk) 08:35, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randhir Jaiswal (January 16)
 Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Herald was:

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.


 * If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Randhir Jaiswal and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
 * If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
 * If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Randhir_Jaiswal Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:The_Herald&action=edit&section=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Randhir_Jaiswal reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

The Herald (Benison) (talk) 06:55, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Rejection of Draft:Mohammed Abd Hassan
Hi, I see you rejected this draft. What was your reasoning for doing so? -- asilvering (talk) 14:34, 29 January 2024 (UTC)


 * hi, I've provided in the comment of even date. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 19:36, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, that's not a valid reason for rejecting an article, so I'm going to revert that edit. -- asilvering (talk) 20:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

Rejection of Draft:Kaber Vasuki
Hello! Have fixed the bare links and simplified the article in view of neutrality. Request to review from regional perspective (Tamil Independent Music), artist is very notable in the space - even setting a record for artist with highest valued NFT sold by Indian independent musician at 1.5Crores. References of similar artists Tenma Sean Roldan. Artist in question is also the lyricist for the recent Kollywood movie by Dhanush CAPTAIN MILLER and has worked with notable Kollywood music artists adding notability beyond the Independent work. Eurocentricjoker (talk) 05:54, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Help in editing or saving the page
Hello @User4edits, I just made few edits in the page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:T_S_Nandakumar) adding few links and sources. I have submitted it for review and it got declined. I just wanted to know as how can i improve this article furthermore or should i delete some sentences of this article where there is no link and if any one would provide me some path or specifics as where in this page should i improve and flaws. it would be much appreciated. And i see there are many sources about the person but need some help or direction on how to go with it. I just need help in not getting this page deleted. Thanks in Advance for your help. Thank You! Ashvik08122023 (talk) 09:24, 2 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Ashvik08122023 You can consult the following help & guideline:
 * Learn how you can create a new article on Wikipedia and
 * Reliable sources to learn more
 * Thanks. User4edits (talk) 11:09, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks, I am just trying to challenge WP:PROMO here. @CSMention269 User4edits (talk) 10:48, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

Bachhrawan railway station
I created this page upon request from Wikiproject India/Requested Articles. Can you assess/review this page? CSMention269 (talk) 07:42, 8 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @CSMention269, I am not a reviewer, but I can tell you that this is a station, and not a junction, with the following stats:
 * Track: Double Electric-Line
 * Number of Platforms: 3
 * Number of Halting Trains: 26
 * Number of Originating Trains: 0
 * Number of Terminating Trains: 0
 * source
 * I will leave the rest to you, and the reviewer. You may want to read WP:NRAIL. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 09:45, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

Asha Singh
Hi User4edits, Do you remember which user created Asha Singh? Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 08:49, 14 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Jeraxmoira, I am not aware, but you may want to see this.
 * Any specific reasons though? User4edits (talk) 11:56, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I started the above SPI. I believe Asha Singh was a redirect to Digamber Singh. Did someone try to recreate it? I saw a recently closed AfD here. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 18:22, 14 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Jeraxmoira, Yes, it was created and existing when I nominated and for AfD (don't know how they pass AfC or patrol). Twinkle delivered the AfD message to User:Af1grazel . Thanks, User4edits (talk) 09:01, 15 February 2024 (UTC)

Sahi Siva Draft Article
Hi User4edits, do you know why the article has been rejected into the main space?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Sahi_Siva
@User4editsWhat makes this article not been notability guidelines? Your feedback would be very helpful in this stage. 81.104.111.169 (talk) 12:28, 17 February 2024 (UTC)


 * You can read this article --> NARTIST and learn for yourself. You should also read about Conflict of Interest on Wikipedia, Thanks, User4edits (talk) 13:04, 17 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft on IBM Think conference
Hi. I didn't understand why Draft:IBM Think conference is declined. I have added plenty of reliable third party sources including IEEE Spectrum, TechCrunch and Computer Weekly. I would be glad if you include details. Thanks. VectorVoyager (talk) 10:23, 18 February 2024 (UTC)


 * I do not find WP:SIGCOV, plus many of your citations are WP:PSTS such as IBM itself, and WP:SPS such as PRNEWSWIRE. With what is rest without them, the subject does not seem notable or have received WP:SIGCOV. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 11:02, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I have added several significant Forbes citations and more info now along with from other news/tech outlets. Does it look any better? VectorVoyager (talk) 14:16, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @VectorVoyager, Thanks. You may want to TLDR the paragraphs to make it more encyclopedic, right now, it reads like a summary of events or company's internal Minutes. Since I saw some references which do not deal with the conference, but IBM in general, I will not be delving into others before you clean up. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 14:41, 18 February 2024 (UTC)

Draft on r/BollyBindsNGossip
Hi User4edits, draft of r/BollyBlindsNGossip was declined. I want to know what improvements shall I do to make it more reliable. I've used the best available news sources already. Pirateinthesea (talk) 18:25, 19 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Pirateinthesea Please see WP:GNG. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 07:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)

Request on 05:40:02, 27 February 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Jcody21
Hello, I would like to know what part of the sourcing guidelines you think the sources already included are failing. I understand that the first two sources are not independent/secondary to the subject, but it doesn't make sense to not include them as they are used to outline the goals of the study and what is to be reviewed and are a useful reference to confirm that what the article says is the stated intent. The other two sources should be sufficient to prove the notability of the subject, but if not, I had already attached further sources for article expansion in the future on the talk page, but I didn't want to waste the reviewer's time by including additional sources that all say the same thing. Should I include some of these other sources despite not saying more?

Jcody21 (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2024 (UTC)


 * @Jcody21, Please see WP:GNG and WP:N. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 10:51, 27 February 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Randhir Jaiswal has been accepted
 Randhir Jaiswal, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the  [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Randhir_Jaiswal help desk] . Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider.

Thanks again, and happy editing! zoglophie •talk• 09:50, 28 February 2024 (UTC)

Wiki page
how can you guide to make a Wikipedia page? Shalinibhasin (talk) 02:08, 1 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Shalinibhasin, Are you connected to Ashish Bhasin, which was deleted on 31 January 2024?
 * Also, don't share your phone number here. WP:PRIVACY. User4edits (talk) 11:15, 2 February 2024 (UTC)

Editing in BHU
Hello, I have edited in history context of BHU and found it was reverted twice by you. Would you mind to share your views on reverting my text? We can discuss if you feel these is any correction. I can share links and other info if you may think that it's not valid. Thank You Gurmeetchahal (talk) 07:58, 29 February 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Gurmeetchahal, You did not CITE any Reliable Source. Therefore it was undone. Also, just in case, |eternalvoice.in is not a Reliable Source. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 11:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, This is more surprising to me that you considered my link is not reliable solely. If you are the only decision maker here. It's hard to reach at common platform. There must be plenty of committee members from different community and professions in this specific scenario. However, many other similar links and citation are on this page and they haven't really put effort to prove their point, but they still exist. Is it sort of favouritism that one can play. Moreover, my link which you reshared with me is not even going to right webpage either. I am still open for discussion.Thank You Gurmeetchahal (talk) 13:25, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * I do not read AI generated replies. Sorry mate. @Gurmeetchahal. Feel free to come back when you have to say something. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 13:27, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * There is no AI thing on my side, If one has good writing skills, it doesn't mean he/she is using AI. Now, I would say, you are definitely doing something more suspicious or writing one sided stories on wiki pages. And why would I care if I know I am doing right things. I was very open to discuss with you on same table. But you are really not interested in open dialogues and taking charge of this community page all by yourself. If this will keep going on, no one really trust any open community platform. This is way much against wiki policies even when one person think or believe that he is only right and have enough free time to keep editing pages. Gurmeetchahal (talk) 17:54, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Gurmeetchahal Ah, my esteemed interlocutor, your assertion regarding the absence of artificial intelligence in your domain is duly noted, albeit with a measure of perplexity. It is incumbent upon us to acknowledge that the possession of commendable writing prowess does not ipso facto implicate the utilization of artificial intelligence. Indeed, the correlation between linguistic proficiency and the employment of automated means of composition is a matter warranting further contemplation.
 * However, I must regrettably express my bemusement at the insinuation levied against my personage. Your asseveration that my actions are tinged with suspicion or that I am predisposed to penning narratives of a unilateral nature upon the exalted annals of Wikipedia is, dare I say, confounding. It is incumbent upon us to approach such allegations with a modicum of circumspection, lest we inadvertently traverse the treacherous path of baseless conjecture.
 * Pray, indulge me in elucidating the fallacy inherent in the notion that one's commitment to rectitude should preclude an earnest engagement in discourse. Verily, I extend the proverbial olive branch in the spirit of amicable dialogue, yet I find myself beset by the specter of unilateralism masquerading as orthodoxy. Permit me to opine that the propagation of an environment conducive to open dialogue necessitates a willingness on the part of all stakeholders to engage in introspection and mutual understanding.
 * It grieves me to witness the erosion of trust within the crucible of community-driven platforms, for verily, the sanctity of such endeavors rests upon the foundation of collective endeavor and transparency. The assertion that the custodianship of a community page has been usurped by an individual imbued with a sense of unilateral righteousness strikes at the very core of our shared commitment to egalitarian principles.
 * In summation, let us endeavor to traverse the labyrinthine corridors of discourse with a spirit of magnanimity and intellectual humility. May the beacon of reason guide our deliberations as we navigate the tempestuous seas of communal governance, for it is only through concerted effort and genuine dialogue that we may hope to preserve the sanctity of open community platforms in accordance with the precepts of Wikipedia's hallowed policies. User4edits (talk) 21:30, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * @Gurmeetchahal I implore you to reconsider the tenor of your discourse and to channel your concerns through channels conducive to constructive dialogue and dispute resolution. Personal attacks and unfounded accusations have no place within the hallowed halls of Wikipedia, where the pursuit of knowledge is predicated upon the principles of civility, collaboration, and mutual respect. Let us endeavor to uphold these principles in our interactions, that we may continue to foster a community that is truly open, inclusive, and conducive to the advancement of knowledge for all. User4edits (talk) 21:34, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
 * wow, wow. this is really a lengthy letter and feels like you just wanted to show your writing skills but unfortunately you get caught within 3 milliseconds. Alas ! No wonder, copyrighters are going out of businesses soon as AI is being used everywhere. I really care less how do you use your natural language skills. I openly admire technology especially when I am coming from same industry. So, why would I question if one is taking help as long as person is delivering value to masses, we shouldn't either.
 * Let AI keep aside for now, I don't think you will ever get my perspective even I shared a link. Now, I feel, I am wasting my time. But I may try if I can gather more for citation. But again, who knows, it's very easy for you to dismiss it by just saying this is not enough. It's like cat-fight where Arabs and Indian are arguing each other who invented or brought zero to world first. Anyway, Let me wrap-up and I hope you will find peace. Thank You and Good Bye Gurmeetchahal (talk) 07:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Let AI keep aside for now, I don't think you will ever get my perspective even I shared a link. Now, I feel, I am wasting my time. But I may try if I can gather more for citation. But again, who knows, it's very easy for you to dismiss it by just saying this is not enough. It's like cat-fight where Arabs and Indian are arguing each other who invented or brought zero to world first. Anyway, Let me wrap-up and I hope you will find peace. Thank You and Good Bye Gurmeetchahal (talk) 07:30, 1 March 2024 (UTC)

I recently wrote an article and you keep declining it by saying it's not notable
I wrote an article and you keep constantly rejecting it as. There's many issues with it.

1) First of all the issue mainly concerns of events in Bangladesh. I also only gave tags of Bangladesh in it. Why are Indian editors deciding whether an article concerning Bangladesh is notable or not instead of Bangladeshi editors?

2) You mentioned "Similar and much bigger instances of such protests (from Nepal, Maldives) have been moved/merged to respective country-India relations". You contradicted yourself because Wikipedia has a separate article on the current crisis in Maldives-India relations, see 2024 India–Maldives diplomatic row.

3) The article on this topic exists already on Bengali Wikipedia already. Here it is. It is a pretty big thing in the country right now. Do you suggest to instead translate the Bengali page?

I also replied to you in my talk page but you didn't bother to check it. Why are you, an Indian editor, deciding whether issues concerning Bangladesh are notable or not? Please let others, especially Bangladeshi editors decide on it. The issue is certainly notable and I proved it in my article. Please read it and if you still want to keep declining my article, provide evidence to support your claim. AyazKader (talk) 19:09, 1 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello @AyazKader,
 * 1. This is not about being Indian or Bangladeshi.
 * 2. No, you are wrong. 2024 India–Maldives diplomatic row is completely different from India Out in Maldives (more notable event) which is present at India–Maldives relations.
 * 3. Existence on Bengali Wikipedia is not a ticket to English Wikipedia.
 * Also, you kept repeatedly submitting the draft without any changes or improvements.
 * I could not see your reply as you were not pinging me, and I was not watching your talk page. Please see WP:NEVENT. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 02:56, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I don't understand. If I write an article about Bangladesh, why will an editor from another country judge instead of a local editor who knows the events here better?
 * The one you showed for Maldives shows the Civil society perception. That has nothing to do with the movement in general. It doesn't have any mention of it either. Completely different topic.
 * I'm just showing that the event is notable. You constantly keep claiming that it's not while editors in the Bengali Wikipedia says otherwise. The article there is a bit different because it also includes the information about the movement in Maldives too
 * The article also meets the inclusion criteria
 * It will have a lasting effect because the whole opposition in Bangladesh together with the civilians who support them are creating an effect already and have plummeted sales of Indian products. This will have an effect on trade and relations of the country in the future. All the references are in my draft. Read it if you don't believe me.
 * It also received fairly good coverage on both local and international media. The movement is mostly a social media movement. You would see hashtags of the movement have been trending on social media since January as I proved in my article.
 * Why are you the only person deciding? There should be more people, especially Bangladeshi editors who should also decide here on this matter. AyazKader (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @AyazKader, WP:NEVENT is a Wikipedia guideline. Any editor, of any nationality will go through it. Advise you to read it once. Thank you, User4edits (talk) 05:17, 2 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I read through it. I also explained how it meets the criteria. If you are really adamant about proving it's not notable, please explain how. You didn't raise any point against my argument. I think the best solution is Third opinion AyazKader (talk) 15:38, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Megha Bajaj
Hello, User4edits,

I saw that you tagged this draft for speedy deletion but there was no notification on the User talk page of the draft creator. You used Twinkle so this should have happened automatically. Please check your Twinkle Preferences and make sure, a) that the box "Notify page creator" box is checked off and b) that ALL CSD criteria boxes are checked off as well. It's important to let content creators know when pages that have worked on have been tagged for any type of deletion and, even more importantly, why they have been tagged. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 06:56, 4 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Liz Hi, as I see it is already checked. Plus, as you will see, Twinkle has sent notifications for all CSD before and after this CSD. So, I am not sure if it is anything from my end. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 07:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Damayanti Sen
Hi buddy, I was thinking that I would create another BLP of not another politician but from police background. Can you see this and tell me any necessary things might be required which will improve this page qualifying GNG. Comments on the draft will be enough. Thanks. :) --CSMention269 (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅ User4edits (talk) 10:52, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I made some changes per you said in comment, so can kindly review this, when you are free? If necessary changes are required, you please knock me in my talk page. CSMention269 (talk) 14:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Ahmed M. Badr
Hello, User4edits,

I don't know why you rejected this draft rather than just declining it and asked for it not only to be deleted but salted. Have you evidence that this article has already been created and deleted before? That's the reason why we salt a page and we rarely salt pages in Draft space. I looked at these references and while they are not secondary, they demonstrate that this subject has accomplished a lot. I think the article creator should be encouraged to improve the article with better sourcing instead of deleting the draft. AFC reviewers are supposed to help editors write better drafts unless the drafts are pure advertising and I don't think this is. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 07:07, 5 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi @Liz, As you will see, all references are primary, including his own websites. The user has repeatedly created uploaded the copyrighted image from the subject's own website, despite repeated warnings. The user has used most primary sources while their editing history suggests they have adequate knowledge of this basic policies of WP. I do not find the accomplishment demonstrated through WP:GNG or WP:SIGCOV. It rather fits the pattern of promo/advert BLPs. Thanks, User4edits (talk) 07:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)

Pakistani naval deployment
Much smaller deployments and incidents have their own pages and so I'm creating these deployment articles of recent geopolitical events, didn't understand your edit so please elaborate I'll be thankful, Maybe I've an idea guide me about that, what about independent naval developments in red sea crisis as there already exists Operation Prosperity Guardian and Operation Aspides .Waleed Ukranian (talk) 17:49, 11 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hello @Waleed Ukranian, in addition to my comments on the Draft, I did not find notability of the "deployment". I have left a welcome message on your talk page which has necessary advice. Thanks and happy editing! User4edits (talk) 18:58, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I've prepared a new draft it's almost complete and it's much more notable than previous one check it out and tell whether I need to improve it and how to do so, I prepared a separate one instead of contributing to red sea crisis as Operation Prosperity Guardian and Operation Aspides have their separate ones so it deserves its own Waleed Ukranian (talk) 17:13, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Independent_deployments_in_red_sea_crisis Waleed Ukranian (talk) 17:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hi @Waleed Ukranian, I have left comments there on the draft itself. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 17:55, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * No I meant you should check it out once again and tell whether it'll be accepted, I'll be thankful. Waleed Ukranian (talk) 23:52, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Waleed Ukranian Just a note: do not use references in infobox, if the same information is referenced in body text. Also don't WP:CITEKILL. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 04:44, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * But it wouldn't be a problem if I have already done so right? Waleed Ukranian (talk) 04:49, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Waleed Ukranian You are editing on Mobile, on desktop it disorients the Infobox and makes it disproportionately large. It is a problem for the reasons I mentioned above and earlier. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:30, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @User4edits I've removed citations in the infobox, Shall I submit now? Waleed Ukranian (talk) 11:18, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Request to cancel the article from the deletion list
Hello dear User4edits

After I found out this article (Najmeddin Shariati) was put on the removal list. I corrected the information and added reliable sources related to the article

Please remove this article from the deletion list

And if the article has problems, edit and correct it

Thanks M.sharaki (talk) 12:34, 15 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Please see Guide to deletion. This will help you. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 12:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @M.sharaki Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 12:57, 15 March 2024 (UTC)

Guidance on how to move fwd from a rejected article
Hello @User4edits hope all well. I've edited the article once again that I've been working on (even after you mention it's been rejected). I'm just working on it to improve it. Can you pls have a look? Ive added more info on his professional career + added authentic sources that go with. If this is still not approved, pls guide on how to improve/ what is missing? Thanks Coco Adnan (talk) 11:45, 17 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Coco Adnan
 * Hi, Please read these and decide for yourself if the person is notable
 * Any biography notability
 * Creative professionals notability
 * Remember, you will need to prove the notability with reliable sources and significant coverage. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 11:55, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @User4edits can I pls get the page deleted until there are enough reliable sources. thanks Coco Adnan (talk) 13:05, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Coco Adnan I have placed your request on the Draft concerned. I see that it has been deleted now. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 14:35, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

WP:G5
Hi, WP:G5 is about block evasion, not article creations by users who were blocked after their page creation. Best regards, &#126; ToBeFree (talk) 19:36, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 04:14, 19 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Pankaj Mehta
Hi User4edits, thank you for your feedback on my recent draft discussing the career of Draft:Pankaj Mehta. On my own talk page, I have responded to your criticisms and would appreciate any more particular guidance on how to proceed you might provide. I'm writing you here because I am not certain if your or my own talk page is the more appropriate setting for this discussion.

Thank you again for your feedback.

Magenta.lily (talk) 15:55, 18 March 2024 (UTC)


 * ✅ Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 04:13, 19 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Hello, User4edits. I see you have removed my recently created article from the main article namespace. I have addressed your previous comments by adding several more sources about Mehta from other highly reputed science publications, Wired and Quanta magazines. You have requested that I not move the article myself if the article is in AfC, but the article is no longer in the AfC process. Could you please explain further why you have reverted this article?
 * If you again take issue with the quality or nature of the sources referenced, I would like to emphasize that in the comments on the draft page, it says:
 * “In summary, the draft needs to
 * meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria OR cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth
 * Make sure your draft meets ONE of the criteria above before resubmitting”
 * Mehta's page certainly meets criterion 3 of WP:NACADEMIC, so fulfilling the latter is
 * not strictly necessary; although, I would argue it is met. This is because Mehta has been elected a Fellow of the American Physical Society. The equivalence of being elected an APS Fellow and establishing notability has been agreed upon elsewhere, including on the talk page for APS Fellows. I would appreciate if you would more fully and specifically justify your actions and undo your reversion. I am not aware of any policy that prevents me from creating a page by moving, even if it has previously been in AfC. I am a confirmed user and have already created multiple pages through AfC. If you doubt the page I have created satisfies the criteria for being a Wikipedia page, a more appropriate process might be WP:PROD, not reversion of creation without discussion.
 * Thank you for your time, and I look forward to your response.
 * Magenta.lily (talk) 05:13, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Magenta.lily Hi, I have given the reason for revert in edit summary. (Bypassing AfC). I have also left comments on your talk page, asking you to wait patiently if you have submitted the Draft. You submitted the draft for AfC review and then moved it yourself. If he meets C3 of NPROF, a reviewer will accept the draft. Please be patient. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:21, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your response. I am not aware of a policy that prohibits creating an article myself even if I have previously submitted the draft to AfC. If such a policy exists, I would greatly appreciate a link. Autoconfirmed users who have already created a page through AfC are not required to go through AfC again (see Drafts). A relevant page and policy might be WP:DRAFTIFY which specifies that draftification should not be used as a proxy for deletion and one of the reasons outlined on that policy page must be specified when draftifying. On that policy page, it additionally states that draftification should not be used during new page review if “the topic is plausibly notable”. I would additionally review WP:DRAFTOBJECT.
 * As a gesture of good faith, I have resubmitted the page to AfC, and I would appreciate if you evaluate whether C3 of WP:NPROF is satisfied yourself as you previously rejected and then draftified the page, justified by it allegedly not meeting one sufficient but not necessary criterion. When making this consideration, I encourage you to read this talk page. I am requesting that you do this yourself. Thank you for your consideration. Magenta.lily (talk) 06:02, 21 March 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thanks @Awsib, I am doing nothing. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

About multi-page move discussion
Hi there, I see that you have tried to open a multi-page move discussion, putting the discussion on both Talk:Royal Enfield (India) and Talk:Royal Enfield talk pages. However, this is not required and just one discussion at one location is sufficient. A bot will come by to put the RM banners on both pages, and as well as adding a notice on the other talk page. I have taken the liberty to undo one of the discussions so that the bot does not trip up any further. – robertsky (talk) 10:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Hi, I waited for a few seconds to see any change on the other talk page, but there was none. So I put it. Nonetheless, . Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 11:24, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Understandable. The bot runs every 30 minutes or so. Next time wait for an hour. If it is not there still, you can check with other editors at WT:RM. In a grand scheme of things, 1 hour for the bot to put up the notices is relatively small compared to the minimum 7-day discussion period. Cheers! :) – robertsky (talk) 14:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)

Interesting...
Reference User talk:Publicrelationr: It seems like there is a lot of interest to pay (esp in India) to be put on Wikipedia. In my recent hunting on Indian business/people, I have found most articles were created by experienced or such appearing editors with good knowledge of Wikipedia policies to understand that the subject won't be notable, but using that knowledge to bypass basic checks/scrutiny by others. Mentioning: @331dot @Flux55 @Jeraxmoira for their information. User4edits (talk) 07:54, 18 February 2024 (UTC)
 * User talk:सीमा कश्यप blocked as sock and doing promo creations/editing appears to be using the same AI generated type reply and activities.


 * 07:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC) - User talk:Rajeshthapaliya was noticed through Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard with similar AI/LLM powered promotional editing pattern. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T)
 * Previously, User talk:Gurmeetchahal was noticed writing long paragraphs on their and mine talk page. Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T)

Interesting... (list)

 * User talk:Publicrelationr
 * User talk:सीमा कश्यप
 * User talk:Rajeshthapaliya
 * User talk:Gurmeetchahal and at at my talk page

Interesting... (list 2)

 * Usanas Foundation Page History Creation

Request on 03:36:38, 29 March 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Seeking absolute truth
Hi, regarding your decision to not accept the article on Sandip Sinharay submitted by me, I would like to explain why the article is worth being included in Wikipedia. Your message indicates that the article should meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria. If you look carefully, the article meets three or four of the eight academic-specific criteria. So I request you to reconsider your decision of not accepting the article. One of the eight academic-specific criteria is "8. The person has been the head or chief editor of a major, well-established academic journal in their subject area." In my article, I provided links to prove that this person, Sandip Sinharay, is the current chief editor of Psychometrika that is a well-established journal in this person's field. If you have any doubts, please search the journal holdings at a university of your choice and you will find the journal Psychometrika there. Please also do another search to verify that Sandip Sinharay is indeed the editor of the journal. I also provided links to prove that he was editor of two other journals in his field---Journal of Educational Measurement and Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics. Again, please feel free to do your own search about the importance of these journals and to verify that he was indeed an editor of these journals. Criterion number 1 is "The person's research has had a significant impact in their scholarly discipline, broadly construed, as demonstrated by independent reliable sources." and I provided the Google scholar link to prove that the person's h-index is 38 and i10 index is 113. Again, if you know an academic, please ask that person what these numbers mean and you will find out that these numbers mean that Sandip Sinharay had a significant impact in his scholarly discipline. Criterion number 2 is that "The person has received a highly prestigious academic award or honor at a national or international level." and I provided links to prove that Sandip Sinharay received multiple awards from a well-recognized organization (National Council on Measurement in Education) in his field. Criterion number 6 is that the person has held a highest-level elected or appointed administrative post at a major academic institution or major academic society and Sandip Sinharay is a Distinguished Presidential Appointee at Educational Testing Service that is known all over the world. Thus, I request you to reconsider your decision after doing a little more homework on your part. While you want to be rigorous in your selection criteria, you surely want to include people who deserve to be included in Wikipedia. Regards, Seeking absolute truth

Seeking absolute truth (talk) 03:36, 29 March 2024 (UTC)


 * @Seeking absolute truth Hi,
 * I left this comment on the draft Also do not use SPS such as ORCID..
 * h-index of 38 and i10-index of 113 may be very impressive for you, but that is not. I am somewhat of an academician myself, and I know that there are far more people with far better indices, and they are not on Wikipedia, and that is fine. Further your other points are answered below:
 * Please see WP:NPROF:
 * Citation measures such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. They should be approached with caution because their validity is not, at present, completely accepted, and they may depend substantially on the citation database used. They are also discipline-dependent; some disciplines have higher average citation rates than others.
 * For the purposes of Criterion 2, major academic awards, such as the Nobel Prize, MacArthur Fellowship, the Fields Medal, the Bancroft Prize, the Pulitzer Prize for History, etc., always qualify under Criterion 2. Some less significant academic honors and awards that confer a high level of academic prestige can also be used to satisfy Criterion 2. Examples may include certain awards, honors and prizes of notable academic societies, of notable foundations and trusts (e.g., the Guggenheim Fellowship, Linguapax Prize), etc. Significant academic awards and honors can also be used to partially satisfy Criterion 1 (see item 4 above in this section).
 * Citation measures such as the h-index, g-index, etc., are of limited usefulness in evaluating whether Criterion 1 is satisfied. They should be approached with caution because their validity is not, at present, completely accepted, and they may depend substantially on the citation database used. They are also discipline-dependent; some disciplines have higher average citation rates than others.
 * For C6, you said Sinharay is a Distinguished Presidential Appointee at Educational Testing Service. ETS is a private company, not an academic institution, and does not arise the question of a major academic institution or major academic society.
 * Hope this helps! Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:07, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

Draft:Sandip Sinharay
I see your points about criteria 1 and 2. It is true that Sandip Sinharay will never win anything like the Nobel prize. However, you avoided commenting on my first comment--what about criterion 8? Sandip Sinharay is the editor-in-chief of a major journal in his field (Psychometrika) and has been the editor of two other major journals in his field. These facts seem to qualify his biography for Wikipedia. Or please explain how they do not. I removed the mention of ORCID from his bio. To a question from you, I am an early-career researcher and receive occasional advice from Sandip--so I have no conflict-of-interest about this matter and I just wrote some plain facts about his career in the bio---there is no promotion, selling etc. And he is not paying me. But interestingly, I was chatting with him after your decline and he said that he received an email from some Laura Walters who offered him to rewrite and include his bio in Wikipedia for $380. Of course, he is not going to pay anyone for this. Seeking absolute truth (talk) 00:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks for your reply,
 * early-career researcher and receive occasional advice from Sandip along with I was chatting with him after your decline indicate that you clearly have a Conflict of interest. You should declare it.
 * Next, as for C8, head or chief editor of a major well-established academic journal in their subject area. I do not think journals with impact factor of 1 or 2 will be called major well-established. Lastly, please ask Sandip to report such emails as per Articles for creation/Scam warning. He (and you too) may also want to read this article -- An article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. Anyway, the draft is open, you can work and re-try. By the way, it is still full of WP:SPS sources such as GoogleScholar, own journals, primary sources. Thanks, Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 05:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Where does it say that Google scholar is a WP:SPS source? On the other hand, the text "On many topics, there are different interpretive schools which use the same documents and facts but use different frameworks and come to different conclusions. Useful access points include: scholar.google.com and books.google.com, and (through libraries) ABC-CLIO’s two abstract services, American: History and Life (for journal articles and book reviews dealing with the US and Canada), and Historical Abstracts (for the rest of the world.) Research libraries will hold paper guides to authoritative sources." on Reliable source examples seems to imply that Google scholar is a good source. Unfortunately, there is no independent source listing all the research work of an academic in our field. Also, you do not think journals with impact factor of 1 or 2 are "major well-established", but do you know of "It has been stated that impact factors in particular and citation analysis in general are affected by field-dependent factors which invalidate comparisons not only across disciplines but even within different fields of research of one discipline."? (Source: Journal Citation Reports). What in your opinion is a good impact factor in our field then? Also, even if we agree that impact factor of 1 and 2 are bad, Psychometrika's 2022 impact factor of 3.0. But anyway, now you will write that 3 is not much better than 2. I am increasingly getting the impression that you will keep rejecting each time because you are probably running a racket where you will decline articles and your buddies will contact the persons, offering to have their biography accepted in exchange for money. In this case, you are also clever enough to have a buddy with a U.S. name and email account (of Laura Walters). If you do not mind, what is your share in the $380 that Laura asked from Sandip Sinharay? And your plan is good. Some people will pay up. For example, I see a Wikipedia article on Alina von Davier, one of the biggest self-promoters in our field. You can verify that Alina von Davier's h-index and i10-index are less than Sandip Sinharay's; the two of then worked in the same company (ETS) for 10 years and their career trajectories are very similar. So it is amazing that her article is up and you are working so hard to reject Sandip Sinharay's. It must be that Alina von Davier paid to have her article accepted (who knows, maybe, you got a cut for her article). I will try to bring this issue to the attention of others at Wikipedia. In the meantime, I added a COI statement in my article on Sandip Sinharay (but that does not matter, because Sandip Sinharay won't pay your buddy--so his bio will never be accepted). Seeking absolute truth (talk) 03:45, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Can you please show me any page to support your statement that Google scholar is a WP:SPS source? On the other hand, on Wikipedia:Reliable source examples, the text "On many topics, there are different interpretive schools which use the same documents and facts but use different frameworks and come to different conclusions. Useful access points include: scholar.google.com and books.google.com, and (through libraries) ABC-CLIO’s two abstract services, American: History and Life (for journal articles and book reviews dealing with the US and Canada), and Historical Abstracts (for the rest of the world.) Research libraries will hold paper guides to authoritative sources." seems to imply that Google scholar is a good source. Unfortunately, because Sandip Sinharay is not at a university, there is no independent source other than Google scholar or ORCID that list all of his research work. Also, you do not think journals with impact factor of 1 or 2 are "major well-established", but you must know of "It has been stated that impact factors in particular and citation analysis in general are affected by field-dependent factors which invalidate comparisons not only across disciplines but even within different fields of research of one discipline." (Source: Journal Citation Reports). What in your opinion is a good impact factor in Sandip Sinharay's field then? Also, even if we agree that impact factor of 1 and 2 are bad, Psychometrika's (that he is an editor of) 2022 impact factor is 3.0. Also, in educational measurement or psychometrics (his field), impact factors of 3 or h-index of 38 and i10-index of 113 are not bad at all. For example, Alina von Davier, who has a Wikipedia page, is in a similar field as Sandip Sinharay and has an h-index of 37 and i10-index of 100 (both less than Sandip Sinharay's). Finally, I added links to his getting funded by prestigious U.S. Federal agencies like National Science Foundation and Institute of Education Sciences--hope they convince you of his notable academic criterion. Seeking absolute truth (talk) 04:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Hasan Pirkul
Hello User4edits, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Hasan Pirkul, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Draft:Jitesh Singh Deo
Hello User4edits, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Draft:Jitesh Singh Deo, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 15:17, 2 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sanjay Srivastava (academician)
Hello User4edits,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sanjay Srivastava (academician) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Wikisteveb4 (talk) 16:14, 6 April 2024 (UTC)

About your edits to Draft:Vipin Bainsla
Hey User4edits, thanks for tagging this page for deletion. AfC receives a lot of submissions that should be speedily deleted, and of you see one in the future, I would recommend simply tagging it without engaging in an AfC review. Taking steps like moving the page to draftspace creates additional cleanup for the deleting administrator, and rejecting the submission adds unnecessary bloat to the user's talk page. Let me know if you have any questions! —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 14:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Thanks, Please feel free to ping/mention -- User4edits (T) 06:57, 22 April 2024 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Sthaneshwar Timalsina


The page Sthaneshwar Timalsina has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it was a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

Please do not recreate the material without addressing these concerns, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If you think this page should not have been deleted for this reason, you may contact the, or if you have already done so, you may open a discussion at Deletion review. Liz <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">Read! Talk! 05:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)