User talk:User5843/Copper extraction/Hylaversicolor Peer Review

Peer reviwed your article before deadline of Friday march 3rd
Everything in this article is relevant to the article topic.

Nothing distracted me.

The article appears to be very neutral. There are no claims, or frames that appear heavily biased toward a particular position.

The viewpoints expressed are not over or under represented.

The citations and links work. The sources also support the claims in the article.

Each fact is supported by an appropriate reliable reference. The information comes from neutral and credible publications. The sources are of excellent quality for this article and they are not biased. The information appears up to date as many of the sources listed in the reference section have been published in the last 10 years.

This draft has an impressive abundance of very credible and reliable sources.

This article draft is very well written and demonstrates an impressive amount of knowledge related to the original article that this draft will contribute to. These all appear to be meaningful contributions and should add improvement of quality and enhance the original article.

Where is this addition going in the article? Which section? Is this a new section you are creating? Or is this being added to an already existing section of the article? Be sure to include proper headings and sub-headings if you are creating a new section in the article.

the inclusion of linkages are very well done and comprehensive.

Overall, this is an excellent first draft and it appears you are well on your way to having a meaningful contribution to this Wikipedia article. Just remember to include headings and sub-headings if you are planning on creating a new section in the article page.

Be sure to add a summary of your intended changes and why you intend to make them to the talk page of the article too.~ Hylaversicolor (talk) 16:39, 4 March 2023 (UTC)