User talk:User931

Moved
Have moved you additions to the research section. Best Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 06:58, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Can you please reply on the talk page? Doc James  (talk · contribs · email) 17:31, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

Your edits to Huntington's disease Comment
Thank you for editing Huntington's disease. You added information about planned clinical trials. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and in general it is not appropriate to add information about planned or in-progress events.

In addition, medical articles should rely on high-quality source material known as MEDRS (MEDical Reliable Sources). In general this means authoritative review articles, not primary sources such as press releases or even primary publications.

Finally, please note Wikipedia's policy on conflicts of interest. If you have a professional or personal connection to the SIGNAL trial, it is not appropriate for you to add material about it. If it is sufficiently important, someone else who is more independent will add it once its results are published and reviewed in a suitable MEDRS source. Dubbin u &#124; t &#124; c 09:02, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
Hi, You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Edit war warning
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war&#32; according to the reverts you have made on Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor‎. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement. Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states: If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jytdog (talk) 15:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
 * 2) Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.