User talk:UserGK23

July 2019
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Neil Nitin Mukesh, you may be blocked from editing. ''Don't vandalise. Discuss here '' Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

How is this vandalism? I have already left a message on your talk page and you have refused to take part in further discussion. Either give reasons for your edits or stop reverting for no reason.

You are not in a position to block people so please don't issue warnings to scare users. https://m.mediawiki.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Help:Sysops_and_permissions


 * Firstly maintain civility and do not make personal attacks on users. Your edit warring can get you blocked. It is vandalism if you choose to delete content in the middle of discussion. Secondly, I told you to open up a talk at article. And wait for people to come and give their views. It might take some time. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 17:57, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

I have never made any personal attacks so please don't make false accusations. Thanks. UserGK23 (talk) 18:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)
 * The very first line of your post was attacking since you were assuming things about me. Then you started asking my position here. Listen, Wikipedia is a community based on team work. You can't just make changes according to your own POV. That's why discussion is necessary as per WP:BRD. You make a change to a longstanding part of an article, somebody reverts, you talk in the talkpage and WAIT. I've opened up a discussion there. - Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:25, 4 July 2019 (UTC)

You are the one who was making assumptions about me and I even called you out on it multiple times but here now you are just saying the same thing to me.

"You are obviously trying to force your point of view here."

"You are coming across as anti-anything to do with Gujarat. You cannot dictate what Mr. Neil Nilin Mukesh likes or wants in life. Bye enough of your POV"

"You are just wasting my time."

These are all assumptions and personal attacks and you even appear to sound angry just because I did not agree with your edits. Then you refused to discuss these issues further in your talk page but continued to make edits on other articles so I assumed you no longer had any more arguments and hence I made my edits but then you reverted them as usual and just sent a block warning.

You kept saying "it stays", "it stays" and talking to me in an authoritative tone. And then you said " It doesn't matter who's Tanvi, it stays becsue it is reliable and don't post here."

Don't get so angry and talk down to me please. Just because you are an older user and have enough time on your hands to make edits every single day doesn't mean you can just shut everyone up.

I don't wanna put any more effort into these discussions now. I could have put more effort if I had more time and nothing else to do. UserGK23 (talk) 08:06, 5 July 2019 (UTC)

Declined unblock requests
You are not permitted to remove or edit declined unblock requests. You are welcome to create a new unblock request, but note that you are not eligible for unblock consideration here. --Yamla (talk) 15:34, 9 July 2019 (UTC)

Okay. I wanted to edit my post a little as I had pasted it and forgot to add a few more details. So, I'm posting it here again. I'm not asking for unblock. I just want to let this off my chest.

The user they accused me of being a sockpuppet of is an year old account which I had forgot even existed so I created a new account and was accused. I had not used multiple accounts for winning arguments or anything like that because I had forgot the account Karkanistan even existed until it was brought up here.

This user named Atlantic306 said " says he doesnt have time to make as many edits as another editor who has a large number of edits suggesting he has a larger amount of edits under different accounts". I don't know what he meant by that honestly. I said I didn't have time to make edits and revert edits every day like Fylindfotberserk (who apparently has been doing this for the last ten years) because I have more important things to do with my time than be on Wikipedia all day and argue with strangers I don't know about things that do not matter and things which have zero affect on my personal life. I simply stand for the truth and I believe information shared on Wikipedia should be presented in as much an unbiased way as possible.

I don't know where I "suggested" that another user may have more edits under different accounts. I have no idea what he's talking about and I do not care enough either. --UTRSBot (talk) 20:42, 10 July 2019 (UTC)