User talk:UserNameUnderConstruction

There is currently a discussion at Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident in which you may be involved. Thank you.Icelandicgolfer (talk) 22:25, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Advisorshares article content
Hi UserNameUnderConstruction, thank you for your edits to Advisorshares article, however I have reverted the content you re-added to the page and thought I would quickly explain why. Content related to ETFs is not necessary here, if anything it should be added to the exchange-traded fund article not a random firm that deals in ETFs. The tone of the Advisorshare article is is also not very neutral and seems somewhat promotional, please see WP:NPOV, which may give you some idea of how to present information in Wikipedia avoiding a point of view problems. I am not sure if you are associated with this firm, but if you are this may cause a conflict of interest, please see Conflict of interest and you should avoid editing this article. It is also a good idea to check out the Five pillars guidelines as this gives you good overview of the type of content that Wikipedia looks for. Happy future editing... Sargdub (talk) 23:03, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, that makes sense. I was mainly just adding content where I felt it would be helpful, although I see your point about some of this information belonging on the main ETF page. It was definitely not my intention to be biased either way (promote or talk poorly about any firm), and if you look, all of the content I added was sourced properly. I do think it is worth adding a bit more content (assuming it is not already on the main ETF page), but I do like how it is a bit cleaner and to the point after you made edits. Also, thanks for the five pillars resource, I will review that. Happy editing!

Welcome!
Hello, UserNameUnderConstruction, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome! 220  of  Borg 12:50, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Donthaveacowman76 Makes Accusations and Threatens Other Users
I wasn't accusing you of working for the company but by looking at your posts it seems to be a strong possibility since you were stating what AdvisorShares "believes". I just thought that it would better, if someone without these past edits were to decide what is relevant. I just want to let you know for your own sake, according to Wikipedia's rules you have to declare if you are a paid employee of the company. Paid employees adding free advertorial content anonymously may also be violating state and/or federal laws. You should be careful, there are many examples of corporate executives who got caught by the media doing such things. A prominent example is John Mackey of WholeFoods.Donthaveacowman76 (talk) 15:32, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

Donthaveacowman76 is likely the same user as Deepthroat57, Chow4563, Crazykyle83, Keepyallscool, Secretjeepers, DasKapital1867, Evilmonkeyoverlord69, Santaslittlehelperdog101, and possibly others. This user continues to disparage financial services firms. Thank you Donthaveacowman76 for your heartfelt concern, 'for my sake, I will be careful.' Cheers. UserNameUnderConstruction (talk) 19:56, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Zwx24f7 (talk) 21:09, 7 May 2019 (UTC)