User talk:Username1789

Welcome!
Hello, Username1789, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * How to write a great article
 * Simplified Manual of Style
 * Your first article
 * Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
 * Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
 * and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place  on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

"I was told that i couldn't have nor create a wikipedia page for myself because my name wasn't in any journalistic source, that I didn't have enough notoriety."
Please link me to where this has taken place. As far as I can tell, under your current username, you've never created any articles. In fact, writing on Lazard's talk page and nominating Lazard for deletion are essentially your first edits. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:56, 21 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Spiderone I mean, it was in real life from a fellow collegue I think, I don't quite remember as it was a while ago, but I remember double-checking on Wikipedia at the time and it wasnt allowed. Maybe the policy changed in between, I don't know. It is true that I am not a big Wikipedia contributor, though I started to make some edits a month ago on French Wikipedia (where I found Daniel Lazard) and want to keep contributing but Wikipedia policy is a little complicated for me. Username1789 (talk) 10:19, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Spiderone So do you think I can create a page for myself with my work ? I mean I am known in my academic fields for some papers, but never been in journalistic sources. I just want to understand the standards Username1789 (talk) 10:24, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * If you are that notable, someone else will probably write about you, see WP:AUTOBIO. You also need to pass WP:NACADEMIC. You can write about yourself if you want but it's strongly discouraged and considered poor form by the Wikipedia community as it indicates that you're only really interested in using Wikipedia to further yourself rather than to selflessly benefit the project. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 10:43, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Spiderone Okay I understand and to be honest I quite agree with this. I just want everyone to be on the same standards and seeing that Daniel Lazard created his own page without any journalistic source seemed unfair to me and going against this principle. Therefore I ask to delete it so that everyone is on the same good standards Username1789 (talk) 13:13, 21 February 2023 (UTC)
 * I suggest a sock investigation. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:43, 22 February 2023 (UTC).
 * @Xxanthippe what do you mean ? Investigate Daniel Lazard ? How do I do that Username1789 (talk) 11:20, 22 February 2023 (UTC)
 * @Username1789. Have you, or any person acting on your behalf, edited Wikipedia under another username? Xxanthippe (talk) 05:15, 25 February 2023 (UTC).

February 2023
Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Liz Hello, ok I understand, thank you. Are you referring to edits that I made in particular ? Username1789 (talk) 11:11, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest
Hello, Username1789. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:


 * avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
 * propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the request edit template);
 * disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Conflict of interest);
 * avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Spam);
 * do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 05:23, 22 February 2023 (UTC)


 * @Liz Thank you for the Guidelines. I don't think I have any Conflit of Interest. Are you referring to something or someone in particular ? Username1789 (talk) 11:14, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

March 2023

 * Username1789 (talk) 21:49, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

Username1789 (talk) 23:28, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @NinjaRobotPirate
 * @NinjaRobotPirate

Username1789 (talk) 17:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Seraphimblade Talk to me 19:29, 6 June 2023 (UTC)

March 2023
I am sorry but I did not edit your user page. A troll edited it trying to impersonate me, and forged my signature. Cullen328 (talk) 23:56, 27 March 2023 (UTC)


 * @Cullen328 oh okay sorry Username1789 (talk) 11:43, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Cullen328 It seems that no admnisitrator is reviewing my request, could you let me know if there is an error in the code ? Or should I just be more patient ? Username1789 (talk) 11:46, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Your unblock request has been denied. You can submit another one. Cullen328 (talk) 17:00, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Cullen328 I thought a request was still going on, as it says "This user is asking their block to be reviewed", or maybe I didn't write it correctly ? Username1789 (talk) 21:36, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @Cullen328 I sent a new one, is it good now ? Username1789 (talk) 21:54, 28 March 2023 (UTC)