User talk:Username4u

March 2014
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Pinky and the Brain has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Pinky and the Brain was changed by Username4u (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.949287 on 2014-03-17T19:15:00+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:15, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Pinky and the Brain with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 19:44, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Pinky and the Brain
It is sourced, the links are 404, but there is significant info on the web - so they can be fixed. If you think it in error, please discuss it on talk:Pinky and the Brain. Per wp:BRD, do not remove it again without discussion. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 19:49, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Pinky and the Brain with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 19:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Pinky and the Brain shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you don't violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. ''The inclusion of this passage has been discussed before on the talk page. If you wish to challenge that, you can discuss it on the talk page, but you will be blocked if you remove it again.'' M ASEM (t) 13:12, 18 March 2014 (UTC)